|
|
Fair ~ |
|
Punch dog, six months; punch and kill man, 60 daysPosted Friday, July 31, 2009, at 11:54 AM
In Columbus, Ohio, on July 27 an Ohio State University student was sentenced to 60 days in jail for throwing a punch that led to a man's death.
That same day, just 12 miles north in the city of Delaware, another man was sentenced to six months in jail for punching a police dog.
Once again, I'm left to ponder seemingly inexplicable disparities in the law.
I despise abuse of any animal. Anyone guilty of it deserves the maximum penalty.
But only 60 days for what proved to be a punch that killed a man?
The OSU student, Brent Goode, 23, pleaded guilty last month to felonious assault for punching a nursing student, Nickolas Foss, 29, during an argument outside a Columbus bar in April 2008. The punch caused Foss to fall and strike his head on the sidewalk. He died two days later without regaining consciousness.
In court Monday Goode read a statement saying he was sorry for what happened. He said he felt "sick with disbelief" when he learned Foss had died.
In addition to the 60 days, the judge gave Goode three years' probation and fined him $2,000.
Meanwhile, in Delaware, Jeffrey Metz, 45, got six months for assaulting the police dog by punching it in the head and throat and breaking a tooth. The judge there told Metz he also must serve five years on community control.
Sheriff's deputies said Metz led them on a high-speed chase in January when they tried to pull him over for speeding. Metz spun into a field but refused officers' orders to get out of his car. Deputies sent a police dog named Thor into the car and testified that Metz punched the animal repeatedly.
Metz also had been convicted of failure to comply with a police order.
Thor isn't just any dog, of course. He's a law enforcement K-9, trained to do exactly what he did that day. I'm sure he bared his teeth and was growling when he went into the car. I have no sympathy for Metz; he put himself into that situation.
Thor, by the way, has recovered and returned to duty, the sheriff's office said.
It's always risky to draw comparative conclusions from two very different court cases. There are differences in applicable statutes, varying results from attorneys' negotiations and plea bargains, a defendant's background, sometimes judges' perspectives. A myriad of factors can influence sentences.
Brent Goode probably is very sorry for what happened outside the bar that night. Apparently; it was his first criminal offense.
Still, six months for punching a police dog, but only 60 days for a punch that caused a man's death?
I can't square it.
Comments Showing most recent comments first [Show in chronological order instead] |
Larry Gibbs, a Putnam County native, is a former publisher/editor of the Banner-Graphic. He lives and works in Ohio.
Hot topics The Lump Part II(3 ~ 7:23 PM, Dec 21)
The Lump
The Touch of a Teacher
Punch dog, six months; punch and kill man, 60 days
Public Enemies
|
doesn't it involve a human vs animal comparison? By the way, not a narrow minded individual. Quite broad by the way. Why do you try to brand a position as narrow minded? I find that quite narrow minded. I guess I touched a nerve that requires name calling rather than solid discussion.
why is it vivera that anytime someone talks about killing someone, the self righteous crawl out of the walls and start talking aboout abortion. let the story be what the story was intended without the narrow minded including something that has nothing to do with what the story is about.
Remember the sentence is longer for the man hitting a dog or someone destroying an eagle's egg than it is for a human to kill a human egg
What is ironic to me, having worked in law enforcement, done research, and set up a website about it, is that if a member of the public punches a K9 while trying to protect himself, he is charged with assaulting a K9 officer, but when the handlers (behind the scenes) hang their dogs to unconsciousness, punch them, kick them, electro-shock them, helicopter them and slam them to the ground, that's not an assault on a K9 officer?? Some of the K9's where I worked died after being kicked and hanged by their handlers and "trainers", but there is never any publicity about that. I saw a dog being hanged for no reason at all, and when I asked why, the lieutenant said, "I was teaching him not to whine, to take his correction like a man." Really? That is insane! They also nicknamed their training course "The Hang 'Em High Club." They find that sort of thing quite amusing. When I started speaking out about it publicly, I was harassed at home, at work, and in public, and even worse things than that. Some of the research I have done on this subject is at www.stoplynching.com
If what I read is all the facts you have on the "argument" you shouldn't be trying to "square it", because the 60 days indicates there a most likely a lot of facts missing, if you investigated the reason for this minor sentence for such a terrible act maybe you should have reported that in detail. If this IS all the facts of the case, then the sentence is an outrage, and if this IS NOT all the facts of the case, then to even try "to draw comparative conclusions" and report it as such is biased. I think what happened to Mr. Foss is a terrible thing, and the story you passed on has a severe lack of reporting, which compounds the inability to compare.
As far as the dog incident goes, I think ole boy got off easy. Speeding, fleeing an officer, failure to comply, wreckless driving, wreckless endangerment, assault on a law officer, these are things that could have been thrown at him too. Maybe he should have gotten more time in jail and less time for community control, or maybe they just should have let Thor stay with him in the car a little longer!
Due to lack of information, I cannot give my honest opinion about the death of that young man except for the fact that it is indeed a terrible thing, and believe me, I would like to give my opinion, and to try and comment on the comparison of the two cases would be irresponsible on my part.