Greencastle, Indiana · Saturday, November 21, 2009
[SeMissourian.com] Fair ~ 59°F  
High: 56°F ~ Low: 38°F
What does the state do with more than 400 children?
Posted Saturday, April 19, 2008, at 4:39 PM
<< Previous | Read comments | Respond | Email link | Next >>

(Photo)
Nephew of Warren Jeffs calls women "drones."
Did you see the interview of three Mormon women on CNN earlier this week? They all are members of the breakaway Mormon sect led by polygamist Warren Jeff. Considered to be the sect's prophet he is awaiting trial in Arizona on four counts each of incest and sexual conduct with a minor. The charges stem from arranging marriages between teenage girls and their older male relatives.

US officials have now removed over 400 children from the Texas ranch owned by Jeffs, most of which have been separated from their mothers and other caretakers. They are now undergoing DNA testing to prove who the parents of the children are.

The three women interviewed were like unfashionable Stepford wives. In their responses they carefully steered the conversation away from polygamy, the names of their husbands and the possibility of any sexual misconduct. They insisted they simply came on television because they wanted the world to know what was happening to their home outside of San Antonio, Tex.

They appealed to mothers and to the government to let their children return home.

"It literally breaks my heart," said one woman who identified herself as Nancy. "My children are everything to me. Help us get our children back."

The investigation is the latest brush the polygamist Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints - which regards plural marriage as ordained by God - has had with the law. In Texas, girls younger than 16 are not allowed to marry - and members of the sect may have violated state sex and marriage consent laws.

Meanwhile Angie Voss, a child protection supervisor told authorities that the girls believe there was no age too young to be married and they wanted to have as many babies as they could. Voss also testified the girls from the compound had gotten pregnant when they were as young as 13.

In interviewing 20 women 17 or younger at the ranch, investigators learned that there were five named Sarah -- and one of them, like the caller, was 16 and had a baby, although her name was not Sarah Jessop Barlow. The women told investigators they did not know where that Sarah was. It remains unclear whether the 16-year-old who made the calls has been located by authorities.

Police have located a person who may have made the phone calls to child protective services. She is not a member of the church sect. They call her "a person of interest."

"It was the belief that no age was too young to be married," said Angie Voss, a supervisor for investigation at Texas Child Protective Services, "They believe that," added Voss.

A hearing last Thursday was aimed at determining who gets custody of more than 400 children who were removed from the YFZ (Yearning for Zion) Ranch in an April 4 raid. The hearing took longer than expected because of objections from some of the 350 attorneys representing the children.

Voss said about 130 of the children removed were under the age of four and that girls as young as 13 had conceived children at the ranch.

Boys were also removed from the ranch, Voss testified, because "I believe that the boys are groomed to be perpetrators."

Brent Jeffs, a former sect member, says he was a victim of rape and molestation by his uncle, none other than the "prophet," Warren Jeffs. He said other young boys were also abused by Warren Jeffs. Brent left the church years ago but has come to Texas to testify against the sect.

The women from the ranch have repeatedly said the children are not in danger. Brent believes that is because the men have brainwashed the women. He told an AP reporter "You can see it in their eyes. They just--they're not even there. They are drones."

I'm pretty liberal in most of my beliefs. Basically I say live and let live. (Provided no one is getting hurt). After all, one of the tenets our country was founded upon was freedom of religion.

But we have a moral obligation to help protect those who may not be able to protect themselves. How sad that during National Prevent Child Abuse Month this frightening example has emerged. I hope everyone will continue to follow the outcome of this case.

If no abuse is found, should we, as Americans support their religious beliefs? If abuse is found, how should the state deal with over 400 children?


Comments
Showing comments in chronological order
[Show most recent comments first]

I just have to shrug. In a world where all behavior is concidered acceptable I have to wonder why everyone is acting so suprised. Why is this example of moral decay a bigger deal than anything else that's going on?

-- Posted by Inquizitor on Sun, Apr 20, 2008, at 9:34 PM

It is surprising because these people are willing to fight and die for these beliefs. (Similar to those involved with 9/11, who believed that it was their religious obligation to do what they did). I think people should have complete religious freedom, but the difference with this group is they aren't giving their members the freedom to choose that life: they are forced into it. Many may want to live that way, but these kids who have no way of getting out who are being abused need people to help them! That doesn't mean we have to bash the whole religion and every person who has those beliefs, but we can do what we can to keep the kids from being traumatized further.

-- Posted by greengirl44 on Mon, Apr 21, 2008, at 10:09 AM

First let me say from the outset that I am glad the Texas DFS did the right thing this time. I am sure that the only 13 and 16 year olds who ever became pregnant in Texas were on this ranch! Remember DFS investigated another religious sect a few years ago and even though 4 of their trips to the compound revealed no truth to the allegations of child abuse, it was still justification to burn the place down killing 80 +/- men, women, and children. Anybody else remember Waco?

Since the Latter day Saints are in the spotlight now one wonders what is taking place in the shadows that we are being distracted from looking at?

-- Posted by bondsman on Tue, Apr 22, 2008, at 8:05 AM

Please, lets not confuse Latter Day Saints with FLDS. There is a huge difference. Educate yourselves people.

-- Posted by scubagal on Wed, Apr 23, 2008, at 7:27 PM


Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.


From my window sill
Maribeth Ward
Recent posts
Archives
Blog RSS feed [Feed icon]
Comments RSS feed [Feed icon]
Login
Maribeth Ward began working for a community newspaper right out of college. Within a few years she moved to marketing and spent most of her working life as a marketing manager. In 2006 she came back to her first love--writing. She attended Indiana University and is the mother of three--identical twin daughters and a son. She is also the Nana of three wonderful grandchildren--Matt, Riley and Emma. She and her husband Faril share their home with their cat Sunny and dog Roadie.
Hot topics
I am a holiday geek
(0 ~ 8:50 AM, Nov 18)

It finally snowed in Anchorage
(0 ~ 8:20 AM, Nov 12)

Dewey, Cheatham and Howe
(1 ~ 2:33 PM, Nov 6)

The minutes fly by
(0 ~ 9:21 AM, Oct 28)

Tis the season for the spooky, eerie and unusual
(0 ~ 8:12 PM, Oct 19)