[Nameplate] Overcast ~ 52°F  
High: 61°F ~ Low: 48°F
Monday, May 2, 2016

Evaluations in from community summit

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

The results of evaluation forms for Greencastle's pilot community summit event, which was held Aug. 12, were tabulated recently by city planner Shannon Norman.

"This event was intended to be a starting point for other community participation activities to come," Norman said.

The summit took place at DePauw University's Janet Prindle Institute for Ethics, which is located in the university's nature park. It ran from 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.

About 107 people attended the summit, and 69 evaluation forms were returned. Here is a synopsis of the findings:


* 88 percent of respondents said the date and time were adequate

* 96 percent were pleased with the venue.

* 94 percent enjoyed the lunch and refreshments that were provided.

Panel discussions

Eighty-seven percent of the respondents said they liked the panel discussion format.

Some suggestions were to improve audio equipment, allow question and answer sessions during and after panels, limit time for individual panelists, have shorter sessions, add variety to questions and have better focus for the panelists.

Facilitated discussions

The facilitated discussion portion of the summit received positive reviews from 74 percent of respondents, while 12 percent said they did not like the format and 10 percent said they liked it somewhat.

Comments included that the discussions lacked focus and were too facilitator-driven. Other respondents said they would have liked to have seen the discussion questions in advance, for the panelists to be more involved in the discussions and for the groups to have been smaller.

Audience questions

After the summit, respondents were able to submit questions. Here is a sampling:

* "We're enthusiastic and positive, but can we really simply say 'our schools are great?' All PR aside, don't we have some challenges, deficiencies and things to improve?"

* "What seems to be the main reason our community loses out to other communities?"

* "Many people believe that Speak Out (an anonymous forum published three times a week by the Banner Graphic) is one of the most destructive things happening in our community. What justification is there to continue it?"

* "How do we get more retail development?"

* "How do we engage those community members who feel negatively about out community so they will see the opportunities we have locally?"

* "Are low literacy skills a problem or concern for employers?"

* "What can we do to increase the diversity of job opportunities in Putnam County?"

* How do we encourage higher-level job opportunities for local graduates that will encourage grads to stay here?"

The full summary report from the summit is available by calling Norman at 653-7719. She can also be reached via e-mail at snorman@cityofgreencastle.com.

"Individuals who would like more information about getting involved in community planning events should also contact me," Norman said. "I am more than happy to add people to the list for future mailings and events."

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on bannergraphic.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Sounds like a meeting just to meet. Well, i am sure I will sleep better now that i know this information.

-- Posted by idiot on Tue, Sep 2, 2008, at 6:34 AM

I have seen many of these "planning meetings" over the years and nothing ever comes of them. We have problems in this town, but they are never solved --- just talked about.

-- Posted by not gullible on Tue, Sep 2, 2008, at 8:50 AM

There's a difference between "free speech" and recklessness. Allowing people to take pot shots at others without stating their name is irresponsible and cowardly.

-- Posted by JustTheFax on Tue, Sep 2, 2008, at 9:01 AM

"This event was intended to be a starting point for other community participation activities to come," Norman said. Like participating in paying for your own curbs and sidewalks while the city is paying for downtown street lights and benches.

We all need DePauw as a neighbor so that we can have sidewalks. What happened to the money for the sidewalk program this year?

-- Posted by Focus on Tue, Sep 2, 2008, at 11:50 AM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: