[Nameplate] Overcast ~ 55°F  
High: 62°F ~ Low: 56°F
Friday, Apr. 29, 2016

Attorney contends client's arrest was unlawful

Friday, January 23, 2009

The attorney of a Cloverdale man facing felony drug and weapons charges said in court Thursday that his client had been arrested and his vehicle had been searched and impounded unlawfully.

James Hullen Holder Jr., a Bainbridge attorney, said his client, Randy Aaron Sawyer, was initially detained and his vehicle impounded on Sept. 22 for no proof of insurance -- which is illegal in Indiana.

A report from Putnam County Sheriff's Department Lt. Dwight Simmons said he noticed the vehicle Sawyer was driving was traveling "well below the posted speed limit of 70 mph" on I-70 the night Simmons arrested Sawyer, and that he observed Sawyer's windshield was "cracked in several different places." When Sawyer made a right-hand turn, Simmons said, he "swung wide, traveling across the center line and into the oncoming traffic."

Simmons stopped Sawyer at that point. Sawyer produced a valid driver's license and registration for the vehicle, but did not have proof that the vehicle was insured.

Simmons put Sawyer in the rear seat of the police cruiser, and told Sawyer he would be impounding the vehicle. It was also at this point, court documents said, that Simmons advised Sawyer he would be doing an inventory search of Sawyer's vehicle.

That search turned up an unlicensed handgun, scales with residue on them that tested positive for methamphetamine and what Simmons suspected was a cutting agent for diluting controlled substances -- and led to Sawyer being placed under arrest.

Holder contended that under Indiana law, having no proof of insurance in a vehicle is an infraction, and that Simmons had no right to impound Sawyer's vehicle or search it. The next step, Holder said, should have been a citation and a court date for Sawyer during which he would have been required to produce proof of insurance.

"He was placed in the police car -- detained -- for the insurance, and it was at that time the other contraband was found," Holder said. "The basis for the search was absolutely illegal under Indiana law. They arrested (Sawyer) before the search, without a crime having been committed.

"Here we have an officer who believes it is appropriate to say, 'You don't have your insurance card, so I'm going to search your vehicle,'" Holder said. "The only place you have to show proof of financial responsibility is in a court of law. Most people don't carry that with them, and by statute they are not required to."

Holder said the state needed to prove that the seizure of his client's vehicle was necessary for the public safety and that if the vehicle was unsafe, impounding it was the only way to get it off the road.

"The officer didn't want to get the car off the road," Holder said. "He wanted to search the vehicle, and he did."

Deputy Prosecutor Justin Long said he didn't believe Sawyer had been arrested until after the handgun was found, but Holder argued that wasn't how the case narrative read and that wasn't the way his client remembered the order of events.

Simmons was not present in court Thursday.

Sawyer, 38, has been charged with possession of methamphetamine and carrying a handgun without a license, both Class C felonies punishable by up to eight years in prison. Sawyer is also facing a habitual offender designation, which could significantly increase his sentence.

Judge Matthew Headley said he would need to look over the statutes Holder cited in his arguments before he could make a determination on the legality of Sawyer's arrest. A trial in the case is set for Feb. 11, and Headley ordered that date would stand.

Sawyer was on parole through the Terre Haute Parole District when he was arrested in Putnam County. He was released from Putnam County on his own recognizance on Sept. 23, but has remained in jail on a parole hold since his arrest.

Sawyer has done prison time for a number of offenses, including possession of cocaine or narcotic drugs, possession of chemical reagents or precursors and forgery.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on bannergraphic.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

OMG...while the car was impounded, why didn't someone take it for a drive and make a nice "crossing the line" video. Good Lord...waste my tax dollars on something other than court time to decide if this guy is a criminal...a low life piece of gutter trash. Let me decide... HE IS!!!!!!!

-- Posted by 06purple18 on Fri, Jan 23, 2009, at 12:43 PM

I still believe that America is a free land based on law. I still believe the keepers of the law should keep the law. I still believe someone is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

I now believe I am REALLY glad 06purple18 was not one of our Founding Fathers!!!

-- Posted by AnnieO on Fri, Jan 23, 2009, at 4:14 PM

I am a law abiding citizen and do NOT condone criminal activity. However, I do believe in the rights of the driver in a traffic stop. I don't know exactly what the law says (apparently neither does Headley) about the rights of officers during the stop. But, in my opinion, the officer had no justifiable reason to search that car. I also believe anytime an officer walks a drug dog around a car after stopping it for a normal traffic violation- that is an illegal search. I don't want drugs being dealt, but i think a persons' personal rights take precedence.

-- Posted by Rome on Fri, Jan 23, 2009, at 10:37 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: