Reed trial continued

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

The trial of a Greencastle woman accused of drugging her two young children has been continued.

Amy Marie Reed, 27, was set to face a jury on April 8. Putnam County Circuit Court Judge Matthew Headley granted a request by Reed's court-appointed attorney, James Ensley, for a continuance and reset Reed's trial for May 27. Headley also extended Reed's plea cutoff date of March 12 to April 30.

Reed is charged with Class C felony neglect of a dependent (two counts), Class C felony contributing to the delinquency of a minor (two counts), Class D felony neglect of a dependent and Class B misdemeanor interfering with a drug or alcohol screening test.

Reed was arrested in Oct. 9 after her 1-year and 3-month-old children both tested positive for methamphetamine, methadone, cocaine and marijuana. At an initial hearing held Oct. 14, Reed pled not guilty to all charges. Headley set Reed's bond at $30,000 cash only.

Ensley requested a bond reduction for Reed on Oct. 23, but Headley denied it. In January Reed -- who was pregnant and weeks away from giving birth to her third child -- was released from jail so she could enter an outpatient drug treatment program through Salvation Army's Harbor Light in Indianapolis.

As a condition of that release, Headley ordered that a report on Reed's progress and results of her drug screening tests had to be submitted to the court every other week.

Comments
View 3 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • How is the baby and who has it?

    -- Posted by mad-mom on Wed, Mar 18, 2009, at 6:12 AM
  • Last known,I believe the grandparents have them.

    -- Posted by what_it's_worth on Wed, Mar 18, 2009, at 6:27 AM
  • NOT THE NEW ONE!!!!!!!!!!! The other two are with the grandparents.

    -- Posted by herz2kool on Wed, Mar 18, 2009, at 8:38 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: