[Nameplate] Overcast ~ 50°F  
High: 61°F ~ Low: 48°F
Monday, May 2, 2016

BZA denies variance for gun club

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

GREENCASTLE -- A standing-room-only crowd was sharply divided over the issue of a proposed gun club in rural Cloverdale at Monday's meeting of the Putnam County Board of Zoning Appeals.

There was no division among the board, though, as the members voted unanimously to deny an application for a zoning variance.

The land in question is located at 7952 East CR 850S, Cloverdale and is currently owned by Cammie Goldman. Debora Cheek of Danville was the applicant for the variance.

The board's decision hinged on the land being zoned as A1 agricultural. According to the Putnam County Zoning Ordinance, "This district is established to protect suitable land for active agricultural production in Putnam County. Agricultural production is recognized as the primary economic activity in Putnam County, and certain lands are particularly suited to such uses because of their size, configuration, soil, topography and location in relation to other land uses."

As an A1 district, permitted uses for the land include field crop farm, truck crop farm, animal husbandry, kennels, stables, forestry, veterinary office, nursery or greenhouse, grazing, public utilities, feed stores, confined feeding operations, spreading or injecting animal wastes and fertilizer storage.

BZA President Brian Gilmartin said the only way the board could grant a variance was for the applicant's attorney to show the present use of the property allowed was not reasonably applicable.

"What is it about this area that it cannot be used as zoned?" Gilmartin asked.

Cheek's representative Ben Comer disagreed with the board's interpretation, pointing out this land's unique combination of forest, open fields and hills made this site uniquely suited for the club.

"We've searched Putnam County, and this particular site is the only one that meets all (our) criteria," Comer said.

Comer also brought in a pair of experts, one from Camp Atterbury and one from the National Rifle Association, to speak about the safety and the site's suitability. In the end, these arguments were moot.

"This place can be used for farming, and I think it should be," said Delbert Brewer, the objectants' attorney.

The crowd packing the commissioners court at the courthouse annex was divided over the issue, with about half objecting and half supporting the proposed club. Most of the objectants were neighbors concerned about the noise and safety issues the gun club would bring with it.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on bannergraphic.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

What's wrong with Putnam county ? Let these people in and make some job's and collect some tax money ! I know Debbie and Bob Cheek's good people and good to people !!

-- Posted by nova5080 on Wed, Sep 16, 2009, at 3:34 PM

Putnam County didn't mind rezoning 137 acres from ag to mining last fall for Buzzi's shale pit so why can't these people have their's changed also!! People were all against the rezoning and that did not matter then so why does it matter now?

-- Posted by THE BUGS on Wed, Sep 16, 2009, at 5:08 PM

If we have draconian zoning laws, then county bureaucrats control the land.

If we have property taxes, then the state owns the land.

But what happens when someone gets hurt on "your" property?

Is the county bureaucrat who controls the land held responsible? No.

Is the state that gets revenue from the land held responsible? No again.

Therefore, if your name is on a deed, then you own nothing more than a legal liability.

This will not change until we demand it.

-- Posted by VonMises on Thu, Sep 17, 2009, at 11:33 AM

and yet they can shoot in town in fillmore!

-- Posted by whodouthinkur on Fri, Sep 18, 2009, at 8:00 AM

I do not want a gun club in my back yard. Enough said.

-- Posted by et on Sat, Sep 19, 2009, at 1:48 AM

What about what the property owner of this land wants et? He doesn't have any rights? You said and that is that.

-- Posted by dcsaiht on Sun, Sep 20, 2009, at 10:34 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: