[Nameplate] Fair ~ 77°F  
High: 89°F ~ Low: 63°F
Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Lawmakers discuss 2010 session

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

(Photo)
Rep. Nancy Michael, left, listens as Sen. Connie Lawson discusses issues facing the Indiana General Assembly in its 2010 session.
GREENCASTLE -- Local residents had a chance to talk to a pair of their elected representatives Tuesday evening at Greencastle City Hall.

While Sen. Connie Lawson and Rep. Nancy Michael were on hand to discuss a number of topics, the conversation took an expected turn -- to taxes.

Both Lawson and Michael said a big issue in the 2010 session of the General Assembly would be proposed property tax caps. Michael told the citizens she is very conflicted about the issue. While limiting the amount property owners have to pay seems like a nice concept, revenue for the state and localities has to come from somewhere.

"My ultimate concern is making sure there is a revenue stream," Michael said. "There are needs that government has to provide and it's got to be paid for."

She said tax caps would likely lead to raises in income or sales taxes.

Several of the people gathered at the event said they wouldn't be opposed to higher property taxes if it meant local government and schools would have the income to operate properly.

The event "Moving Forward in 2010," sponsored by the Greencastle League of Women Voters and the Greater Greencastle Chamber of Commerce, wasn't simply about taxes, though. Lawson and Michael spoke about a number of issues facing the General Assembly, both next year and in the future.

Lawson said one of the big issues the state faced in the 2009 session was budget shortfalls. During this year's regular and special sessions, the General Assembly had to find ways to cut $750 million from the state budget.

"The good news is Indiana is not one of the many, many states that had to cut school funding, and it is not one of the many, many states that had to raise taxes," she said.

As the chair of the Local Government Committee, Lawson has communicated extensively with Gov. Mitch Daniels on the issue of local government reform. She said she has told the governor the issue has to be focused and pared down.

"I think the big focus is going to be on elections and townships," Lawson said. "It's not about the elected officials not doing their jobs; it's the system that constrains them from being efficient at their jobs."

Michael added to the list the issue of Sunday alcohol sales.

"My concern will be about the small liquor store business," Michael said.

Other issues likely to come up are redistricting, teacher licensing, the Family and Social Services Administration contract, sales taxes on services and ethics reform.

Besides simple discussions of the issues, though, the event was a chance for voters to hear from the legislators about what their jobs are like when they are not in session. Both Lawson and Michael are on a number of committees, with Lawson chairing the Committee of Mental Health and the Committee of Developmental Disabilities.

These committees still meet from time to time when the General Assembly is not in session.

Michael emphasized that a big part of her job is keeping up with the issues. She does so the same way a citizen can -- through the press and other resources.

"The information that we have available to us is as readily available to you," Michael said, encouraging everyone to visit www.IN.gov to educate themselves.

Both legislators also talked about their responsibilities while the General Assembly is in session. As majority floor leader, one of Lawson's responsibilities includes working out a seating chart for the senators, which can be a delicate task.

Michael is a majority assistant whip in the House, helping the majority whip determine if an issue has the support it needs to pass a vote.

Several local elected officials from the city and county were in attendance and expressed their concerns to the legislators about the upcoming session.

"I'll make my annual plea: No unfunded mandates on anything," asked County Councilman Darrel Thomas.

With a laugh, Michael responded, "It's going to be a short session. The hope is that we can't do much damage."


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on bannergraphic.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Property tax caps do not have to lead to other taxes being raised. Just maybe our state government could look for ways to lower expenditures. I know that is a novel thought...

-- Posted by justasking on Wed, Nov 4, 2009, at 9:30 AM

"there are needs that the government has to provide" Are you kidding me. I cant believe someone would think like that. The only thing the government has provided me lately is a bad investment. the government needs the taxpayer alot more than we need you.

-- Posted by worrieddaddy on Wed, Nov 4, 2009, at 6:36 PM

Apparently worrieddaddy doesn't drive on roads.

-- Posted by boilerup on Thu, Nov 5, 2009, at 9:24 AM

You mean the roads where generally 80% or more of the funding comes from the Federal Highway Admin or the roads where the funding comes COMPLETELY from the toll road?

Sorry to rain on your "I love my Nanny State" parade.............

-- Posted by Catie's Dad on Thu, Nov 5, 2009, at 11:06 AM

Part of the problem with the caps is that money to fund local and county government could be lessened as property taxes hit the cap. If that happens, the money has to come from somewhere and the state wants the county to raise the money through county income taxes. As for county roads, very little comes from property taxes, it is mostly from fuel taxes and other state/federal funding. I can't speak for the state level, but contrary to a lot of public thinking, I believe the county does a pretty good job of reviewing budgets and holding the line on spending.

-- Posted by hoosierpete on Fri, Nov 6, 2009, at 7:06 AM

Well said Pete!

-- Posted by Catie's Dad on Fri, Nov 6, 2009, at 11:13 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: