[Nameplate] Overcast ~ 54°F  
High: 63°F ~ Low: 41°F
Tuesday, May 3, 2016

Mitchener's change of placement request denied

Friday, November 20, 2009

GREENCASTLE -- The request of a Roachdale woman to change the place of her incarceration from the Indiana Department of Correction to home detention has been denied.

Attorney Robert C. Perry filed the request on behalf of his client, Tammy Y. Mitchener, 33, on Nov. 4. Putnam County Chief Deputy Prosecutor Justin Long filed his objection to the request on Nov. 5.

Less than two weeks later, the request was denied by Putnam County Circuit Court Judge Matthew Headley.

Mitchener was convicted in July of stealing more than $56,000 from local special education cooperative Old National Trail, where she was employed as treasurer. She was given a five-year sentence with three years executed and two years to be spent on probation.

Headley listed several reasons for his denial of Mitchener's change of placement requested. Among them were:

* That she had so far only served 25 percent of her executed sentence.

* That she had taken part in no rehabilitation programs at the DOC.

* That in the request, no means by which Mitchener could begin repayment of her debts were cited.

* That "Incarceration, in and of itself, can also serve as a rehabilitation purpose, to wit: To emphasize to the defendant that such criminal actions have consequences which entail restrictions on personal freedoms."

Headley went on to say that "The only way the defendant may modify her sentence is to have the prosecutor agree to the modification, which has not occurred at this time."

Mitchener is currently serving her sentence at the Indiana Women's Prison in Indianapolis. She pled guilty to one count of Class C felony corrupt business influence and one count of Class D felony theft. Under the terms of her plea agreement, five other felony counts pending against her were dismissed.

In his motion for change of place of confinement, Perry said Mitchener had received all the benefits that could be gotten from confinement, and that if she had been placed on electronic monitoring she "could begin working and meeting her restitution responsibilities."

Long argued that any change in Mitchener's place of confinement would be a sentence modification, which was expressly prohibited under the terms of the plea agreement into which she entered.

Mitchener was arrested on Dec. 2. She bonded out of jail the same day, and did not return to jail until after she was sentenced in July.

Court records said Mitchener wrote $56,639.19 worth of checks from the ONT's account to a vendor called PC Technologies -- which turned out to be a dummy corporation she set up and opened a bank account for. Mitchener deposited the checks she wrote into the PC Technologies account and then moved the money into her personal account, which was at a different bank, using online banking services.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on bannergraphic.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Aww...Someone not having a good time in DOC?? Good for the Prosecutor and Judge for upholding Mitchener's sentence and forcing her to be responsible for her actions.

-- Posted by EasilyAmused on Fri, Nov 20, 2009, at 5:55 AM

Way to go Judge! My thoughts exactly, how can she start paying back when she didn't before she went to jail! She only wanted out because of the holidays.

-- Posted by specialfriend on Fri, Nov 20, 2009, at 6:09 AM

What if she was put on house arrest in a run-down trailor park, live on a diet of bologna on day-old bread, wear only yard sale-reject clothing, and only have an AM radio and a 13" black and white TV (with foil and coathanger antenna) for entertainment? Would she ask to go back to DOC?

Just wondering.

-- Posted by Xgamer on Fri, Nov 20, 2009, at 6:21 AM

If she is complaining she needs to realize she is better off there since she has more rights as an offender-DVD movies-recreation-don't have to cook or work if she don't want to-can sleep all day-TV-am/fm radio with headset-library books-crafts-excerise equipment-chapel services-law library where she could do a resume-commissary-micro-waves-I hear they even have video games and pool tables-sports to participate in and it goes on-enjoy your vacation at the expense of the tax payers-oh and don't forget she can take education courses.Also visiting rights with her family.As a taxpayor I don't think she has it too bad.Maybe she will see within social of others how the other half live on the outside.

-- Posted by bam on Fri, Nov 20, 2009, at 7:53 AM

Bam, She does not have more rights related to Entertainment. What you "hear" may be not the best or reliable information. I am sure you are a good taxpayer.

-- Posted by Harmony Church on Fri, Nov 27, 2009, at 8:24 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: