[Nameplate] Mostly Cloudy ~ 57°F  
High: 67°F ~ Low: 53°F
Friday, Apr. 29, 2016

County budget requests must be cut $1.8M

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Hearings for the 2012 Putnam County budget are less than a month away and the county finds itself in need of making some serious cuts.

The budget amounts requested from the county general fund by department heads for next year total just over $5 million. The total for all funds currently estimated for next year's budget is just short of $6.4 million.

This doesn't compare favorably with the state's estimated levy of $4.6 million for the county.

"In looking ahead to what we're going to have to do in August and what we might have to do next year, we're over the levy by $1.798 million," County Council President Darrel Thomas said at Tuesday's meeting.

"At this point, I'm opening the table here for thoughts and ideas."

A number of solutions were discussed, including several major budget-cutting measures presented by Auditor Stephanie Campbell.

"None of them are pretty," Thomas said.

A number of reasons for the current situation were discussed by the council and the county commissioners, all three of whom were at Tuesday's meeting.

The first scenario presented was to cut all department budgets to their level for this year. The savings of $1,007,031 would not take care of the entire amount, but it would make a major dent in the shortfall.

The council passed the measure 5-0.

A second proposal was to ask all department heads to cut their remaining 2011 budget by 10 percent. The money saved could be rolled into next year.

The council asked Campbell to send out a memo to all departments regarding the changes. Additionally, all department heads were asked to come to the Aug. 22 and 23 budget hearings prepared to make more cuts.

"The budget hearings are next month. I think we need to set the wheels in motion tonight so the office holders know when they sit before us next month, they need to be prepared to make cuts," Thomas said.

In spite of the cuts, though, some work in the county still has to be done. The commissioners came before the council Tuesday to request an additional $500,000 from the rainy day fund for road money for the County Highway Department.

"We had $300,000 this year for repair and maintenance," Commissioner Kristina Warren said.

However, the amount, which was not high enough to begin with, has depleted rapidly in the face of February's ice storm and a number of spring storms.

"We are asking for $500,000 from the rainy day fund or else we have to stop," Warren said.

The department hasn't even been attempting to put down new roads, simply to patch and repair the existing surfaces. With funds gone, it's a losing battle.

"Year after year, you can't just keep not doing what you need to do," Beck said.

A lengthy discussion between the two boards ensued, with councilors Roger Deck and Jay Fogle requesting to see a more detailed list of what the department plans to do with the money.

"I agree that the roads are bad. All I'm saying is, give me a plan of where you're going to go and what you're going to do," Deck said.

Thomas disagreed, though, saying he did not want to see the council micromanaging the responsibilities of the commissioners.

"The responsibility of roads is the commissioners. If they say it needs to be done, then that's their responsibility," Thomas said. "I don't have anything to offer. My expertise is not roads."

Another worry was that the commissioners and highway department might return before the end of the year again asking for additional money.

"That'll carry us through the end of the year," highway co-supervisor Jim Smith said.

Ultimately, Fogle made a motion to tentatively approve an additional appropriation of $400,000 from the rainy day fund to the county highway road and street fund. The motion was made with the understanding that an additional $100,000 may be requested before year's end.

The measure passed 4-0, with Deck abstaining from the vote.

Fogle also made a point of voicing his approval for the job the County Highway Department has done, saying the roads are perhaps the most important service the county provides.

"I would like to say you guys are doing a good job. It's my personal opinion that the roads are the reason we're here," Fogle said.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on bannergraphic.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Opening the Cloverdale area to commercial real estate/warehousing could increase county tax revenue significantly.

I-70 is already developing as far west as the Monrovia exit...

Maybe its time to start bulldozing junk hotels. The whole 231/I-70 interchange currently seems like such a waste.

-- Posted by ProblemTransmission on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 1:14 AM

What are saying that our roads are good? Have you even drove down any of the Putnam County roads? Where do you live, in town? Come on Putnam County, our roads are the worst in Indiana. Get rid of some of the over head and get our roads fixed.....your manufactureres and companies in Putnam County has had to do this for the last two years BUT I have not yet seen it in our political/county/government areas. I paid a higher dollar amount for a house on a paved road and now it is nothing but holes and gravel but does my taxes go down NO but the value of my home does! Thanks Putnam County for not putting the money where it belongs. Making new bridges where we don't need them and closing roads because you are too cheap to fix the bridges that are damaged...Thanks again for such a great job.

-- Posted by cato on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 12:43 PM

If roads are indeed the most important responsibility of county government, as Mr. Fogle is quoted as saying, then county government in Putnam County is a failure. Like Cato the paved road that runs by my house has become gravel, and is generally a maze of potholes--some of which cause cars to bottom out. But it is clear that there is simply not the money to re-pave county roads; county budgets have been stripped to the bone. The fact is that more money is needed. Wheel taxes should be raised--let those who drive on the roads pay for their repair. In particular, given the damage done (in my case by logging trucks) the vehicles that do the most damage--and use the roads commercially rather than for access to homes--should see the cost of using the roads increase. When we need repairs, and budgets have already been slashed, taxes are not a dirty word.

-- Posted by David Worthington on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 1:42 PM

The politician still gets paid weather our roads get fixed or not,did there pay raises get froze like all other federal employees? I doubt it. If i stop paying taxes till my road gets fixed, its a crime. Go figure

-- Posted by Engineer1 on Wed, Jul 20, 2011, at 8:58 PM

You whiners can always move.........free country

-- Posted by kubotafan on Thu, Jul 21, 2011, at 6:23 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: