[Nameplate] A Few Clouds ~ 79°F  
High: 88°F ~ Low: 72°F
Friday, Aug. 22, 2014

Bid for Bainbridge salt barn accepted

Friday, April 13, 2012

BAINBRIDGE -- The Bainbridge town council unanimously agreed on Wednesday to accept a proposal to build a $33,600 storage facility.

They all hope the new site will be worth its salt.

When discussions first began about building a new salt storage facility in October, the council had a strong case.

"We can store our salt here, in our town, for our town," said Council President Chuck McElwee.

At the present, all off the town's road salt is stored by the county in Greencastle. When a need arises, a Bainbridge truck must travel to Greencastle, pick up salt, have the volume weighed to determine the county's charge, drive back to Bainbridge, dispense all it can carry, then repeat the process as needed.

This can create problems and delays, McElwee said, when a truck arrives to pick up salt and none is there. This can happen because many towns share from the same cache.

The issue was further accentuated when, last year, the council purchased a new truck. Bainbridge was given such a good deal on the truck the council could not pass it up, but this meant an added problem.

Although the bed of the new truck is larger than the previous, the salt-delivery system is a different model and it can no longer hold as much salt as before. That means multiple trips to Greencastle each time the roads become icy.

With all the inconvenience involved, Bainbridge has kept its multipurpose truck filled with salt throughout the winter. For months out of the year, it has only one purpose. If a dump truck is needed during that time, one has to be called in from another town or a private owner.

The new 24' x 36' x 16' salt barn, to be built by Lindsay Construction, Inc. of Rockville will address all of these problems.

The building will allow for the storage of salt, sand and fill rocks. When not in use, the salt dispenser will be removed from the truck and suspended from the ceiling. This will allow the truck to be used in multiple ways throughout the year.

The construction will occur near the Bainbridge offices and also include a large concrete pad to store the town's recycling dumpsters.

Once the salt discussion ended, the council turned to other issues. The meeting, which began a half hour late, lasted nearly two hours after a few lengthy and colorful discussions.

When a proposed feasibility study came up for discussion, the board and community was split.

The council is looking into the possibility of partnering with an independent donor to build a nearby recreation facility and wellness center. The study would determine the costs, benefits and needs for such an entity in Bainbridge.

Council member Joel Thompson was adamantly opposed to the possibility, citing his own personal disinterest in the project and his distaste for criticism from the community.

"I don't understand why we have to keep patting everybody on the back if everything I do is wrong," Thompson said. "I don't know if I want to put money into something if I have no idea what I'm going to get out of it."

McElwee disagreed.

"We don't have the information to have that information," he said. "We have three forks in the road. We can choose to table it right now, not even consider it, not participate and get out right now. (Or) we can participate in the feasibility study and get the information we need to make a decision one way of the other."

The motion eventually carried 2-1, with Bonnie Osborn deciding to agree with the proposed study at a cost to Bainbridge of $14,000. McElwee said he believes the potential value to the community would be about more than money.

"We don't get any money out of the sewer, or out of the roads, or out of the water tower," McElwee said. "It's just stuff that makes this a nice community."

No further information regarding potential start dates or costs is available at this time, but will be covered in the study. The town has plenty on its plate regardless.

Bainbridge has numerous ongoing and costly projects intended to improve the town, and the salt barn will add one more.

The water tower is nearly completed but has lingering issues with the computer system that the council hopes will soon be resolved.

The storm drainage project began construction recently.

"I'm absolutely impressed with what the constructors are doing and the progress being made," McElwee said.

Barring weather delays, it is expected to be completed in five weeks, clerk-treasurer Jason Hartman said.

Also on Wednesday, the council unanimously agreed to a bid for another storm drainage project at the corner of Locust and Vine. The $4,800 bid includes only labor, which will be provided by Stephenson Excavating, Inc. Material will be purchased by the town.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on bannergraphic.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

OK residents of the town of Bainbridge, here is what happened in that meeting. First off they went through old business and made their votes and moved on. They agreed to pay 4800 plus material for a drainage issue. Then they got to this feasable study and of the three community residents that was at the meeting wanted more information before agreeing to speend that much money. Questions from most of them were simple and was completly misdirected by the president of the board. The major question was "who will own the property where this physical therapy center will be located. When asked of the president of the board he first said that the property would be donated to the town of Bainbridge but then when asked who will retain ownership of the property he said that it was under discussion by the powers that be. I must say though if I donate my car to goodwill, who then retains owner ship. Well Goodwill does right.This statement was said over and over by the president of the board, Donate donate donate.. but when directly asked he said the property ownership was unknown. I personally spoke to the Donor company and they have no planes of building a YMCA nor any baseball diamonds. This project will continue without the use of Bainbridge, from their point of view if Bainbridge wants to pay half, they sure arent going to complain. I guess the whole kicker of this study to get info at 30k plus is to get info for the board to make an educated decision. All the community people (non employed by or sitting on a board of Bainbridge) voiced concerns over the secrecy of this project and wondered why that don't fix or continue with the properties we have such as the land north of town which the town owns or even better fix the current ball diamonds we have. The board was also asked who was approached for this project and they said it was a mutual agreement, Sources at the Donor company say that they were approached and did further inlighten me to their exact plans of building a therapy center and nothing more. On further questions one resident asked them how the children would get to said property and at first they said that will come out in the study but then when asked again the president of the board said it was not his or the boards problem. So in all actuallity this project is not for the children as they lead with but more so to fulfill someones agenda. Also when asked for details about the project, the town board said that it was confidential. So Residents of Bainbridge your town board voted to pay this amount with out disclosing and information about the project on the first reading, which keeps any and all community input out of the decision.All I can say is that our board is not educated enough to make this decision to spend the money, and they too admit that. The leader of this proposed project and non board member can be reached at the number below.

Clerk/Treasurers Office(765) 522-6238

-- Posted by Oh My Goodness on Sun, Apr 15, 2012, at 8:39 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.