City writes coda to Phase I facade finale

Friday, August 29, 2014

The notion of approving final payment for the Phase I facade portion of the Greencastle Stellar project was music to the ears of the Greencastle Redevelopment Commission.

So much so, in fact, that board member Gwen Morris happily called for a drum roll. And about a dozen index fingers responded, rhythmically pounding out pent-up excitement and frustration on the edges of a City Hall table.

It's true, the scaffolding is gone from downtown. Painting crews have faded into the woodwork. Awnings are in place. Heck, Shuee and Sons is even finished.

Thus, after months and months of construction crews climbing all over buildings on and around the courthouse square to restore storefronts damaged in the May 2013 fire or renovate those chosen for the 2011 Stellar award, activity is taking a breather.

"So this is kind of a big deal," Redevelopment Commission President Erika Gilmore said in asking for a motion to approve the final claims docket on Phase I of the facade project. It totaled $251,945.

Mayor Sue Murray said she mailed that final payment on Thursday.

So everything is done, the mayor was asked.

Well, not exactly, she admitted. Pella Windows is coming back with substitute screens to replace some that didn't fit a couple of downtown windows well, while another issue involves one door not fitting properly.

"But no facade work," the mayor assured.

"There might be a couple more odds and ends," City Attorney Laurie Hardwick interjected.

However, those items will be taken care of under warranty and not via change-orders that would require any Redevelopment Commission approval.

Gilmore commended the efforts of Mayor Murray and City Attorney Hardwick throughout the long, often exasperating process.

Of course, completion of the first facade phase is far from finishing the entire Stellar project. For example, the parking portion has only just begun and the start of Phase II of the facade project looms as early as next month.

In fact, a meeting with property owners involved in Phase II has been scheduled for Sept. 9, the mayor said.

In the meantime, each property owner involved in Phase I will be receiving an operator's manual from Advance Restoration Co., detailing the materials used and the warranties involved. That way, property owners will know who to contact directly if there is ever an issue on what has been done to their buildings.

Meanwhile, Mayor Murray, who joined contractors on a punch-list walk-through of the South Indiana Street project Thursday morning, said she was amazed by looking at before and after photos of that area.

"It's pretty striking," she said. "It's also pretty striking when you look down the alley (between Indiana and Vine) and how that looks now."

Not so incidentally, the alley, she said, "handled the rain beautifully Saturday night."

However, that was apparently not so at the parking lot project site on the east side of the Moose Lodge.

The 2.73 inches of rain that fell in about 90 minutes Saturday night combined with the excavation work on the property to help flood the Moose Lodge. The issue there was compounded when a water line and gas line were struck during excavation because they were not buried where site drawings said they were supposed to be.

Excavation work on the old Moose lot site has been nothing but full of surprises, city officials said.

Construction crews on the parking lot project have unearthed the remnants of two old buildings that had been bulldozed into a hole, while Wednesday an old cistern was uncovered on the site.

Regardless, the crew from Gibraltar Construction is expected to begin excavation of the second downtown lot -- bounded by Jackson, Walnut and Indiana streets -- as early as next week.

The $1,135,000 parking lots project carries a 150-calendar-day completion timeframe with the Moose lot expected to be finished Nov. 1 and that other lot by Nov. 15.

In regard to another Stellar project, the commission also learned that the second round of owner-occupied home repairs has six new applications being under review.

Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Is the Moose Lodge flooding covered by insurance from the city or the contractor?

    I was informed that the cost to put the Moose Lodge back to original condition may approach $60,000! The Lodge had just installed new carpet less than one year ago.

    None of the above was covered in the B-G article.

    It appears that city officials didn't really want to discuss the situation in public.

    B-G, a followup article is needed on this matter.

    -- Posted by Lookout on Fri, Aug 29, 2014, at 12:21 PM
  • All the money we've spent seems to have yielded but marginal improvements. Regardless of the glaring ineffectiveness thus far, I'd like to point out perhaps the greatest injustice of the entire operation. Consider the fact that the majority of political power in Greencastle is held by a small group of high-income / high-involvement members. Notice that many of these individuals hold properties or have friends that hold properties near or on the square. This is most certainly a conflict of interest, but our local government doesn't give a **** and just keeps smiling at how great everything is now that we've essentially handed money to the people in power. Big names getting big money.

    Why give money to private businesses that aren't on the verge of bankruptcy? The rationality of individuals pursuing profit gives a natural inclination towards effective expenditures. When the government decides it is a great idea to drop 19 million dollars on storefronts, it probably isn't a good idea. We are spending twice the city's annual budget on aesthetics that are only slight improvements and will have a negligible effect on improving the local economy.

    "Wow! The sidewalks are a bit of a brighter white and the street lamps are now powered by an additional firefly. Time to go spend an extra 100 dollars on the square!"

    Also: Shuee's awnings are two different shades of blue.

    -- Posted by daisy48 on Mon, Sep 1, 2014, at 11:26 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: