Ron Brown in police custody, appears in court

Tuesday, September 8, 2015
Ron Brown

The would-be grant seeker accused of pocketing more than $33,000 in Putnam County animal shelter funds appeared in Putnam Circuit Court Tuesday afternoon.

Ronald Dorian Brown, 46, Indianapolis, was booked into the Putnam County Jail at 12:30 p.m. Friday on one theft charge and two counts of deception.

After spending the Labor Day weekend in jail, Brown had his initial hearing before Circuit Court Judge Matthew Headley.

The judge advised Brown of the three charges against him, which include two Level 6 felonies and one Class A misdemeanor.

Brown is charged with Level 6 felony theft, as he is accused of stealing $33,268.10 in funds that he claimed to have paid to contractors involved in restarting the shelter. Headley advised Brown that the charge could be reduced to a Class A misdemeanor.

His second Level 6 felony is deception, as Brown is accused of representing himself as the "project manager" for the animal shelter project.

The Class A misdemeanor springs from the accusation that Brown called himself an "engineer" in relation to the project.

If convicted Level 6 felony carries a sentence of six months to 2-1/2 years in jail as well as a fine of up to $10,000. A Class A misdemeanor carries a sentence of up to one year and fines as much as $5,000.

With Brown saying he understood the charges against him, Headley entered an initial not guilty plea on his behalf.

Brown told the court he had contacted an attorney who he believed was going to be in court on Tuesday. Although this did not happen, he said someone would be hired by his family.

"We will seek out an attorney," Brown said.

At the request of Prosecutor Tim Bookwalter, Headley set Brown's bond at $20,000 cash.

Under questioning from Bookwalter, Brown also told the court he had two previous criminal convictions, both in Marion County.

In one Marion County incident, Brown was sentenced to probation for theft. In an earlier incident, he was convicted for "receiving a bad money order."

Headley set a pre-trial conference for Oct. 29, however, Brown requested a bond reduction hearing.

The judge set the bond reduction hearing for Sept. 24, giving Brown enough time to hire an attorney.

The initial hearing also shed light on Brown having both Crawfordsville and Indianapolis addresses.

Brown has lived with a girlfriend in the Speedway area for several years, but he previously lived with his estranged wife and their children in Crawfordsville.

A warrant was issued for Brown on Thursday after the Putnam County Prosecutor's Office officially filed charges following a seven-month investigation by Indiana State Police.

Authorized by the county only to seek grants, Brown was never an employee of the county nor under contract. He was not officially authorized to handle money related to the shelter nor deal with the contractors.

During Tuesday morning's meeting of the Putnam County Commissioners, officials disclosed that Brown did not secure a single grant for the county or the shelter.

However, claiming to have paid the contractors himself, Brown is accused of submitting claims for work performed by the contractors, but not paying a majority of the claims to the contractors themselves.

One local contractor is also facing charges in the matter, as Ben O'Hair of O'Hair Heating and Cooling is charged with Level 6 felony theft for allegedly being paid twice for some of the work performed.

In March, the Putnam County Commissioners voted to pay the contractors the money that they had not received from Brown. However, among those claims was $5,740 to O'Hair that had allegedly already been paid.

O'Hair has been summoned to Putnam Circuit Court for a Sept. 24 initial hearing.

Comments
View 8 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • So.....who actually takes the blame in this mess? Anyone? Bash a local contractor who is getting their feet off the ground so lets blame them. How about the three commissioners who checked absolutely nothing out. They receive a print out. Glance thru it. Never really studying it. Give me a motion to pay claims. All three say aye. Who checked out the background of this brown guy? One says dont blame me. The second one says not me either. The third one says not me. The auditor says here is your claims. Doesn't cross reference previous payments. Something isnt right here. Nothing in this article says who should have done their due diligence. I would start with rhe three little pigs. In fact go back and read their campaign promises. All of them!!!

    -- Posted by canttakeitanymore on Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 8:57 PM
  • This article def shows that Brown probably is the one to blame. Commissioners should have done some checking before they just issued check after check. It's the county's own fault for hiring someone they didn't check out before hand. Once again the county offices just trying to lay blame on someone with a decent business going and try to ruin the business. Suck it up county offices and take the blame you deserve. Quit blaming others for your mistakes.

    -- Posted by Clifford on Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 9:29 PM
  • With the many, many offices and departments in this county, for the commissioners to watch every move when they trust and direct is nearly impossible. "Do the right thing with the taxpayers money and material" and bad things will NOT happen to you.

    -- Posted by GRNT on Wed, Sep 9, 2015, at 7:40 AM
  • Well that's what the commissioners are getting paid to do and they are the ones that ran for those positions so they should be held accountable table for their decisions. End of story

    -- Posted by Clifford on Wed, Sep 9, 2015, at 8:48 AM
  • GLAD TO SEE THEY CHARGED THIS LOSER. STEALING FROM THE ANIMALS.......I HOPE HE GOES TO PRISON.

    -- Posted by Queen53 on Wed, Sep 9, 2015, at 7:07 PM
  • He did not steal from animals. He stole from the taxpayers of this county who actually foot the bill for animals. I also hope he gets prison, however those who allowed this to happen should also be held accountable queenie. Start at the beginning and you will find who allowed this.

    -- Posted by canttakeitanymore on Thu, Sep 10, 2015, at 8:20 AM
  • ACTUALLY, DIRTY POLITICS, IS THAT HE DID STEAL MONIES THAT WERE MEANT TO TAKE CARE OF THE ANIMALS. MAYBE HE STOLE FROM TAXPAYERS, BUT HE CAUSED A LOT OF HEARTACHE AND MISERY FOR THE HUMANE SOCIETY, HAVING TO SEND ANIMALS TO DIFFERENT SHELTERS SO THEY COULD CLOSE. SO PLEASE DON'T GIVE ME THAT "HE DIDN'T STEAL FROM THE ANIMALS" BS. PLEASE DON'T CALL ME "QUEENIE". MAYBE YOU SHOULD PUT ON YOUR SHERLOCK HOLMES HAT AND FIGURE THIS OUT.

    -- Posted by Queen53 on Tue, Sep 15, 2015, at 1:59 PM
  • Hey queenie, the shelter was closed way before this ever took place and therefore this isn't the cair of the shelter. Maybe you should check some timelines and know your facts before you run your mouth.

    -- Posted by Clifford on Wed, Sep 16, 2015, at 10:01 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: