Vouchers costing county schools $829,515 for year

Monday, April 2, 2018

A statewide analysis of the number of dollars being lost by each school district due to the Indiana voucher program reveals that the four Putnam County school corporations are losing more than $800,000 for the 2017-18 school year.

That Indiana Association of Public School Superintendents (IAPSS) analysis, distributed by IAPSS Executive Director J. T. Coopman, details $829,515 in total losses for Putnam County schools due to the voucher program this year.

Those losses are listed individually as:

-- Greencastle, $272,346.

-- North Putnam, $224,389.

-- South Putnam, $167,485.

-- Cloverdale, $165,285.

Among other area school corporations, the losses are similar.

Montgomery County schools are losing a total of $891,688, divided as follows: Crawfordsville, $344,5603; North Montgomery, $276,599; and Southmont, $270,586.

Clay County Schools -- Northview and Clay City -- are affected to the tune of $599,397, while Spencer/Owen Schools is losing $395,833.

Other area school districts and their losses include Danville, $364,448; Mill Creek, $232,161, and Eminence, $59,544.

It is important to note that the impact of the voucher program is not based on how many vouchers are used in an individual school district. It is based on each year’s Voucher Program cost to the Tuition Support budget across the state, regardless of the number of vouchers used within the district. For example, Lebanon Schools lost more than $530,000, Plainfield Schools lost more than $770,000, and Carmel Schools lost in excess of $2,365,000 this year.

Currently there are 23 school districts where no vouchers are used. They are small districts and the voucher program costs them more than $4 million this year combined. Peru Schools is the largest of these districts and it lost more than $321,000.

To make this complicated issue much simpler, think of a pie -- and as former North Putnam School Superintendent Murray Pride always likes to say -- there are only so many pieces of the pie.

In the case of the voucher issue, Indiana has baked a smaller pie and expects it to feed a larger number of people.

More students, fewer dollars is the result, notes Phil Downs, superintendent of Southwest Allen County Schools, who will present a more detailed report into the impact of vouchers on Indiana school districts at the April 25 IAPSS Spring Seminar meeting.

Downs also notes that there appears to be a misconception about how the voucher program works as well as its impact on public schools.

Here is how a voucher works -- A family wanting to attend a private school that accepts vouchers files their taxes like every other family. Like all taxpayers, a little over 44 percent of their income tax goes to support the education of all of Indiana’s students through a fund called Tuition Support. The family that qualifies and wants to send their student to a voucher school then fills out a form (the voucher) directing the state to send money from the Tuition Support budget to their private school.

This year Indiana will send more than $150 million to private schools. The amount of each voucher varies per student, but the average is $4,258.

There are no charter schools in Putnam County.

Conventional wisdom has believed that the voucher program will only affect big cities, Downs noted. But while voucher usage is higher in big cities, the financial effect is felt in every school district because the voucher dollars come out of Tuition Support, in effect reducing the dollars supporting students in all public schools.

State legislators have been quick to point out that Indiana is now spending more on education than ever before. That is true and it was true in the 2015 budget and the 2013 budget before that. But with the voucher program in place, that funding is not going entirely to public schools.

Also, Downs said, Indiana spending is not keeping up with inflation and it is impacted by the increasing number of vouchers being used.

Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Saying that they "lost" this money is like saying that Kroger lost my money because i prefer to shop at Walmart. It's called consumer choice and since when is that a bad thing? Here's an idea, make a produce (education) that the consumer (parents) wants to buy. Don't sit here and lecture people about how horrible it is for you to make the best choice for your children. As the article states there are no charter and very few private schools in the county so the parents taking this route are making that choice at considerable cost in time and resources to transport their children to where they believe they will get the best education. They're only doing that if they believe the other options are offering a benefit. If you're serious about getting some of that "lost" money back then perhaps you should take the time to talk with some parent who are making this decision to find what it is that is driving them to make this choice and then make appropriate changes to YOUR school district to try and draw them back. But that would be actual hard work and require you to change so I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for that.

    -- Posted by hometownboy on Tue, Apr 3, 2018, at 8:05 AM
  • hometownboy-AMEN!!

    -- Posted by davgreencastle on Tue, Apr 3, 2018, at 5:13 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: