NP board considers school resource officer, discusses budget changes

Monday, August 20, 2018

ROACHDALE -- After a change of venue and a later start time, the North Putnam Board of School Trustees addressed important issues regarding school safety and the school corporation’s finances during its monthly meeting Thursday night.

Holding the meeting in the North Putnam High School auditorium to accommodate students and parents who attended to hear the board’s response to another unrelated issue, the board considered the prospect of hiring a school resource officer (SRO).

NPCSC superintendent Nicole Singer brought a proposal before the board that outlined a working relationship with the Bainbridge Police Department, which would provide one sworn police officer to monitor activity at the corporation’s four schools.

The school corporation was recently awarded a Secured School Safety Grant through the Indiana Department of Homeland Security (IDHS), which would match up to $50,000 toward upgrading and enhancing security measures at North Putnam Schools.

Singer said the Town of Bainbridge and BPD would be responsible for everything the officer would need, while the school corporation would be responsible for the officer’s salary and additional training, if needed. The matching grant would then be used to cover those expenses.

In response to a question by board member Dustin Osborn concerning the officer’s availability, Singer said that the SRO would be assigned duty during normal school hours. Additionally, the officer would be available for at least 20 extracurricular events during the school year, and that he would be welcome to interact with students.

Board member Travis Lambermont felt that the SRO could be approved by the board while other options for security could be explored. Singer said the proposal, which is still being finalized, was only brought forth for discussion and not for a vote.

The board concluded that more time would be needed to consider other measures before hiring a school resource officer.

The board next heard explanations regarding where the school corporation stood with its finances, as well as necessary changes to the budget. Singer informed the board that it had to establish two new funds -- an operational fund and an education fund -- required by state law. The operational fund would consolidate funds allocated to capital projects, transportation and bus replacement, while the education fund would hold money allocated from the state.

The board approved the creation of the funds, with board member John Hayes opposing the approval. Singer also said the budget would have to be advertised soon, and that meetings would have to be scheduled to work those details out.

Additionally, Singer presented the figures for the corporation’s insurance and liabilities. The board approved a new clause that added a “cyberliability” policy, which would be needed given how sensitive information is stored on computers. Singer said that the insurance premiums could come in about $700 more than last year’s total figures, but that the school corporation was well-covered in its liabilities.

Officials from the four schools in the corporation also informed the school board that the beginning of the school year had progressed smoothly and without issue.

The next regular school board meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m. Thursday, Sept. 20 in the Administration Office at Bainbridge.

Comments
View 4 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Maybe honeyroastedpeanuts would like to post his/her real name if he/she wants to publicly attack Mr.Lamermont.

    Rodger Winger

    -- Posted by rawinger on Tue, Aug 21, 2018, at 7:25 AM
  • The other "unrelated issue" was of course the gender-confused child taking selfies in the bathroom. Shame on the Banner Graphic for closing that article to comments. Journalistic cowardice on full display.

    As for this story - I don't understand why North Putnam (or any school in Putnam County) needs a Police Officer (coyly named as a Student Resource Officer) roaming the schools.

    Are they there for window dressing? Seems like a waste of money. Are they there to protect the children? If so, it seems that the community could easily find several volunteers that would be willing to take some small amount of training - active shooter as well as conflict resolution, perhaps - and do just as effective a job at a lot less cost.

    -- Posted by AverageWhiteGuy on Tue, Aug 21, 2018, at 1:00 PM
  • Where is the sheriff department at? Looks like a way the deputies could have made more money while protecting our kids.

    -- Posted by Avenger1234 on Wed, Aug 22, 2018, at 6:35 AM
  • Any reason why the Banner refuses to report on the fact that our County Commissioners refuse to hold Operation Life accountable for the $400,000 they gave Operation Life for staffing, when last Sunday Operation Life laid off 8 people and now only staff the county with 2 ambulance for all 911 calls?

    -- Posted by putnamcountyperson on Wed, Aug 22, 2018, at 11:34 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: