DePauw University to lay off 56 current employees

Tuesday, February 26, 2019 ~ Updated 11:41 PM

Citing a “challenged annual operating budget,” DePauw University officials announced Tuesday the layoff of 41 full-time and 15 part-time employees.

Additionally, 14 vacant full-time and two part-time positions will not be filled.

Faculty members have also been offered a voluntary retirement incentive plan.

The reduction in force comes at the end of extensive studies not only into DePauw’s finances, but also comparisons of the university to similar institutions.

University President Mark McCoy announced the moves to faculty and staff, but also reached out to the Banner Graphic Tuesday afternoon to discuss the matter.

Mark McCoy

“People probably understand that DePauw has a strong balance sheet. We have a large endowment and a beautiful campus,” McCoy said. “But we have a very challenged annual operating budget that we have had for a very long time.”

McCoy went on to explain the benchmarking exercise that he and the board of trustees had gone through to see how DePauw compares to the most financially successful schools of its type across the country.

Reducing a list of 107 schools to 14 of similar size that operate with a balanced budget or surplus, the DePauw administrators discovered they use a lot more employees than their peers.

“Benchmarking against those schools, we recognized that we have somewhere between 20 and 60 more faculty, even though we have the same number of students, and we have 125 more staff,” McCoy said.

“Today DePauw announced that we were offering a voluntary retirement program for our faculty,” McCoy added, “and that even though the number of staff is 125 (above average), we have eliminated 41 full-time administrative and staff positions, 16 of which are eligible to retire.”

Staff members and administrators who were informed Tuesday will remain employed with DePauw through June 30.

More employees are eligible to retire under new terms announced by the university on Tuesday.

“We have lowered the retirement number from 80, which is your age plus your experience level, to 65,” McCoy said. “So staff that are involved in the restructuring who meet the rule of 65 can retire.

“The 25 others will need to transition,” he added. “We have transition services on campus. We have a robust buyout option.”

The buyout option will include a lump sum of either six months of pay or two weeks of pay for each year of service, whichever is more. The employees will also receive a COBRA subsidy equal to three months of coverage cost.

“No one will get less than six months of pay,” McCoy said. “For the people to whom we’ve announced this today, in February, they will be taken care of until next January.”

Additionally, the university will pay for career counseling and transition services.

“We have outplacement services available to them for the remainder of this semester,” McCoy said. “We will work with them, giving them liberal leave and doing everything in our power to help place those staff that are impacted by this.”

McCoy added that the elimination of 17 part-time positions represents a reduced reliance on part-time staff.

While a severance package will also be offered to part-timers, there will be no six-month minimum.

As for faculty, any reductions will be voluntary.

“On the faculty side, we are offering two years of pay if they meet the rule of 65 and make next year their final year,” McCoy said.

Eligible faculty members who choose to retire effective June 30, 2020 will receive two years of base salary and retirement benefits, including health insurance.

McCoy emphasized that while these actions are a negative, the university is trying to make these moves while it is still operating from a position of relative financial strength.

“What we want people to understand is that DePauw is doing this in a moment of strength, while our endowment is strong, the returns are strong,” McCoy said. “And while we’re doing well we want to be able to do this now, where we can treat our employees with dignity and respect with this robust separation agreement, rather than wait until it’s too late.”

With 759 university employees, the 56 layoffs represent seven percent of the DePauw workforce.

The administration and staff layoffs also do not seem to be tied to seniority or level of employment, as they include six full-time administrators, 19 full-time salaried staff and 16 full-time hourly staff.

The vacant positions not being refilled also include four administrators.

In a letter to members of the DePauw community, McCoy and Kathy Patterson Vrabeck, who chairs the board of trustees, said the restructuring is part of a two-pronged approach to building upon DePauw’s strengths. While one part of this is realignment of resources, the other is to “aggressively invest in our students, programs and campus.”

“Accordingly, we are finalizing plans for new student housing and the renovation of our library, implementing our campus energy master plan and endowed student leadership initiative and increasing scholarship support,” McCoy and Vrabeck wrote.

McCoy and Vrabeck closed their letter by stating their commitment to “ensuring that DePauw can build upon an unsurpassed student experience and achieve our vision as a university of choice and distinction for generations to come.”

Comments
View 8 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • WOW!!!

    -- Posted by kubotafan on Tue, Feb 26, 2019, at 5:09 PM
  • Sounds like bad news for Greencastle. How can DePauw be in a strong position if they have to lay off that many employees?

    -- Posted by nordicheart56 on Tue, Feb 26, 2019, at 7:09 PM
  • That is a matter of perception. My heart goes out to those families impacted by this action. But 7% is half of what GM is doing to realign. And, that is a VERY generous package. Compare this to what happened to the Dixie Chopper families.

    -- Posted by cfr1926 on Tue, Feb 26, 2019, at 10:24 PM
  • *

    Ironically, this will actually have a negative impact on daily operations.

    McCoy thinks that their little comparison of other schools was conviction enough to justify the reductions. Bear in mind, you can have multiple schools "of the same size" operate differently in all aspects. Interestingly enough, the devil is in the details and once you get your hands dirty with it, you see these differences: the programs, the facilities, the systems, the licensing, the events... They all play major roles in operations. Yes, it's typical to see a president speak in short tongues when describing these circumstances to news outlets or general audiences but NEVER assume that those other metrics are taken into account during the entire assessment: you'd be absolutely shocked by just how often they aren't.

    Additionally, operation budgets balloon for good reasons: the people doing the hiring (usually middle management) know where inadequacies exist and so they hire additional staff to compensate. This is called DELEGATION, especially if it's done within the fiscal parameters senior leadership has (or should I say, should have?) mandated. So if their operation budget ballooned and their answer for this is the elimination of livelihoods, who's to blame? The people being let go? Once you answer that, you know where the real problem is.

    Call me crazy but maybe someone should spend more time tidying up the home or learning more about the processes the school uses to determine how the balloon expands and less time hiding behind PR podiums as the social justice crosshairs line up during an apology to students responsible for hijacking the campus or making forays into statehood trying to dictate how hateful people are allowed to be...

    -- Posted by DouglasQuaid on Tue, Feb 26, 2019, at 11:10 PM
  • *

    "...19 full-time salaried staff and 16 full-time hourly staff."

    Now, if we add the open positions that won't be filled... "Additionally, 14 vacant full-time and two part-time positions will not be filled."

    So that is 19 full time salaried staff, and 30 full time hourly staff, and 2 part time hourly positions... for a total of 51 JOBS gone. (For what it's worth - Fox59 has the number at 71 total positions.)

    Now, this doesn't include faculty which was listed separately.

    These are your typical mid-level and lower level jobs that are being eliminated... which means that the people that are still there are going to simply have to do more for the same amount of pay. (Sounds like a pay cut to me.)

    Layoffs/terminations/RIFs, pay cuts, and a restructuring that directly impacts the town in a negative way.

    I also noticed that there was nothing about Mr. McCoy taking a pay cut to ensure a better future for DePauw.

    I think I will just sit here and enjoy this moment of clarity... while certain DePauw defenders should be thinking what they would like on the side with their crow.

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Wed, Feb 27, 2019, at 11:04 AM
  • It seems like DePauw could fund raise amonng its wealthy and successful alumni to create endowments for employee and faculty salaries. Fewer faculty members cannot be a good change for a small liberal arts college that advertises small classes and close interaction with faculty. I pray that a better solution can be found other than layoffs. A strong DePauw means a strong Greencastle.

    -- Posted by nordicheart56 on Wed, Feb 27, 2019, at 1:37 PM
  • So let me get this strait, you're required to lay off employees to meet your operating budget, yet somehow have loads of money to spend on effectively replacing all of your freshmen dorms? Also, said dorm replacement will increase the number of housing units available when you already can't fill the lower number you currently have? All of this sounds like extremely poor management to me.

    The simple fact is that DePauw has consistently overvalued their institution. How else can you explain consistently struggling to fill classes / requiring drastic financial aid packages to entice students to attend. The layoffs are probably necessary IF they are targeted at the excessive administration and programs which are unnecssary (Looking at Africana Studies / Hispanic Studies / Gender Studies / ETC). However, I expect based on DePauw's track record these are the last places they will actually cut.

    In the near future DePauw will be OK because of their endowment and wealthy alumni. However, long term they have to be concerned because i suspect that over the last 30 years they haven't been churning out the same number of high earners that they have previously. Once those large donors dry up they could very well find themselves in trouble.

    -- Posted by hometownboy on Wed, Feb 27, 2019, at 2:31 PM
  • Liberal Arts. Gives Liberally ........ Maybe if there was a real major for the grads. JS.

    -- Posted by 1armyvet on Wed, Feb 27, 2019, at 6:59 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: