Baird expresses pride in country, Congress

Monday, September 7, 2020
Congressman Jim Baird

Even in the midst of racial unrest, a pandemic and a contentious presidential election, Congressman Jim Baird is proud of what he’s seen from his country in 2020.

While admitting that things have gotten very rocky as Congress negotiates another round of COVID-19 emergency assistance, the Greencastle Republican expresses great pride in what was done back in the spring.

“I thought we did a really good job of coming through,” Baird said. “We took care of the emergency responders first. And then we came back with plans for families and unemployment and then we came back for small businesses.”

On this last matter, Baird notes that the Small Business Administration has handled more volume in terms of grants and loans than it normally would in a number of years.

In thinking about the urgency of those early weeks in particular, Baird thinks about the way a previous generation reacted to crisis.

“It reminds me of World War II, the way we came together and found a solution,” Baird said.

For an example of this, Baird looks at how factories around the country switched their processes to make the things the nation needed to respond to COVID-19.

“When you have factories that have changed their production, it really lets me know how much they understand their equipment to make ventilators or masks or hand sanitizer,” Baird said. “It’s just refreshing.

“That’s inspiring in my opinion.”

While the pandemic and response still grip the country six months or so after the initial wave, Baird told the Banner Graphic he believes some unnecessary issues have made their way into the negotiations.

“So now we’re moving into an area where we’re making less progress,” Baird said. “We’re bringing in issues that maybe need to be dealt with, but not until we get the coronavirus behind us.”

He said he also has the national debt in mind during any such negotiations.

“The other thing that is coming in is, I’m always concerned about the amount of debt we’re bringing in,” Baird said. “In these negotiations, we’re about $2 trillion apart. And $2 trillion is a lot in my book.”

Looking around the country, Baird said he sees other problems, such as protests that have turned violent in a number of places.

“I don’t think anybody objects to having peaceful protests, but when you move into destroying personal property and looting, I don’t agree with that,” Baird said. “Someone is going to have to pay for all of that, and I don’t think it should be tax dollars.”

From there he moved into the discussion of defunding the police.

“You tell me,” Baird asked, “who are you going to call when something is happening to their families?”

Police reform, on the other hand, is something Baird allows is necessary, though he believes that most do a good job.

“There’s certainly a need to make sure that our police officers perform to a high standard,” Baird said. “And for the most part, I think you can say that’s absolutely true. I’ve even heard some officers say that even they want to find a bad cop and have them removed.”

Baird also gave praise to Operation Legend, a Department of Justice initiative that targets violence in cities across the country.

“Information that I have shows that they have arrested over 1,500 individuals and 90 individuals that have been involved in murders have been involved in this Operation Legend,” Baird said. “I think that’s an important part of what’s happening now.”

Looking abroad, Baird said he is proud that Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act.

“In my opinion with my military background, it’s critical that we make other adversaries recognize that we are a strong military country,” Baird said.

He also praised the diplomatic work that has led to improved relations between Israel and the United Arab Emirates.

“When you look at the unrest in the Middle East and how volatile it is, having that kind of stability, it definitely impacts us and has an influence on us and our people’s safety,” Baird said. “The fact that they are going to open embassies in each other’s country and open communication, that’s a good place to start.”

On the other hand, Baird said his concern about China has increased in recent months.

“The coronavirus has revealed a lot about China, not so much the people, but the Chinese Communist Party and their desire to be a world power.”

He said the nation has increased military efforts in the South China Sea and that from an economic standpoint, it controls 80 to 90 percent of active pharmaceutical ingredients in the world.

“It comes down to the fact that not only are we dependent upon them, but they’ve acquired a lot of our debt as well,” Baird said, noting that this makes it even more important to have good relationships with other Asian and Pacific nations.

Finally, Baird expressed his concern about socialism taking hold in the country.

“I have a real concern for talking about socialism and talking about it so openly,” Baird said. “It has been tried in so many places around the world and it has not been successful. I don’t understand how anyone could talk about moving to socialism.

“To me, this country is still the shining light on the hill. I think we give hope ­ and that’s an important word ­— that there is a place or you can create a place that is friendly and enticing to raising your family and being safe.”

Baird noted that while doing the business of Congress has changed in recent months, he’s done his best to stay active in Indiana’s Fourth District, noting that his office has responded to more than 30,000 constituent messages in that time and settled 190 cases for those having issues with federal agencies. This has brought between $70,000 and $80,000 to those constituents.

“At the current time, I am the voice of this legislative district,” Baird said. “I sure think it’s important that we all have a voice at the legislative table.”

Comments
View 30 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • i find it a bit odd that you don't hear much from him until it's time for an election.

    -- Posted by Falcon9 on Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 6:56 AM
  • How's he feel about being called a "loser" and "sucker"?

    -- Posted by unbiased on Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 11:41 AM
  • Wow. Name calling. Nice. Would be better to express why you disagree without the need to call names. Name calling alone would cast doubt on your post name.

    -- Posted by beg on Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 4:17 PM
  • Unbiased,

    I apoligize for condemning you on your post. As much as I think I think it is counter productive and not necessary, that is your choice.

    I needed to step away before I posted.

    -- Posted by beg on Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 4:19 PM
  • *

    Beg, Unbiased was referencing what our President had to say about Veterans I believe.

    -- Posted by RSOTS on Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 4:35 PM
  • Yes, thanks RSOTS. I was referring to the president. I have the utmost respect for veterans and am furious about the comments he is reported to have made. Baird has been a decent representative for us, although I wish he would speak out about some to the unpalatable things coming out of Washington.

    -- Posted by unbiased on Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 4:55 PM
  • ahh, yes. Or supposedly said. Can't just blindly trust media today- either side.

    -- Posted by beg on Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 5:31 PM
  • Thank God for anonymous and unidentified sources. Without those two brave, stand-up heroes of unbiased journalism, both life and the evening news would trend toward the boring, and we might have to create some unsubstantiated rumors to entertain us.

    -- Posted by Prince of Stardust Hills on Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 6:54 PM
  • @ Unbiased--After 4 years of fake news about President Trump I can't understand how you would fall for a fake news about Trump. If you want to be furious then be furious at your ignorance.

    -- Posted by donantonio on Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 9:11 PM
  • *

    DonAntonio, you do realize Fox News confirmed the story right? Or are they just fake news when they report something you disagree with?

    -- Posted by RSOTS on Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 9:38 PM
  • RSOTS, are you absolutely sure the FOX network confirmed anything? Jennifer Griffin, again, quoted the ever-reliable Mister Anonymous and his cohort, Mister Unidentified, in her report and said she checked again with Goldberg, but did the FOX network confirm anything? Based on my research, I'm disagreeing with your statement.

    I'm very interested in this story, too, but before I pass judgement, I'll wait until the truth is confirmed and the supposed "facts" are based on more than heresy.

    -- Posted by Prince of Stardust Hills on Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 11:03 PM
  • Heresy. Hilarious.

    I think you mean hearsay.

    -- Posted by GladysK on Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 11:14 PM
  • Yep. As a writer, this isn't the first time spellcheck corrected my fingers, but glad you understood and found it hilarious. I did, too.

    -- Posted by Prince of Stardust Hills on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 7:06 AM
  • *

    Prince, Jennifer Griffin works for Fox, Fox ran her report and Trump personally called out Fox so it seems to me that Fox confirmed this story but if you disagree well that's the beauty of beliefs.

    https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/fox-news-reporter-doubles-down-on-confirmatio...

    I in know way support the propaganda that Fox spews daily but I do love the irony of the Right / Trump base swearing by it until they say something negative about Trump.

    Fox actually waged a legal battle stating that they don't have to tell the truth but yet they remain the rights bible for so called facts.

    https://www.themarysue.com/fox-news-defending-tucker-carlsons-bs/

    The second funny fact is getting hung up on "Anonymous" sources when the right literally quotes and follows "Q Anon" beliefs. So much for the Anonymous being an uncredible source. Not to mention that Trump starts every sentence with "A lot of people say" yet we never really get to meet or hear from these "people".

    And don't try the rebuttal of "but CNN / MSNBC" because they are just as bad they are just on the opposite side.

    -- Posted by RSOTS on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 8:25 AM
  • RSOTS, thanks for understanding my opinion on this particular/single issue. Overall, in turn, I agree with you totally on the excessive use of anonymous and unidentified sources in the press. Well said.

    -- Posted by Prince of Stardust Hills on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 9:25 AM
  • What's the "socialism" Baird's talking about? It's just typical vague Republican talking points. China bad (not Russia), Israel good (because Jesus hometown), and be afraid of socialism! The "socialism" he's referring to is social security, medicare, public schools, post office, etc. that the GOP has been trying to defund and destroy for decades. If you depend on SS/medicare to survive you're being played for a sucker. Baird's talking about those awful "socialist" countries like Canada, UK, Denmark... he's playing us for fools.

    -- Posted by Raker on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 9:56 AM
  • @RSOTS--"I in know way. . . " It should be "no way". Obviously, you do not know much about English grammar.

    -- Posted by donantonio on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 10:57 AM
  • Don Antonio (formerly known as "the wise one"): Is this how you spend your days, looking for spelling and grammar errors in the Banner Graphic? How sad you have nothing better to do. Please start up a hobby or at least make an intelligent comment rather than scrutinizing everyone else's statements.

    -- Posted by Ben Dover on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 11:13 AM
  • *

    DonAntonio, you are 100% correct I made a grammar error there. Now care to refute my point or is pointing out spelling / grammar errors the only thing you can contribute? If that is so then that is great as well. All of the adults can use a spell check as we discuss actual topics.

    -- Posted by RSOTS on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 11:38 AM
  • *

    RSOTS/Prince/Don Antonio/Beg/Unbiased - Fox News is no more trustworthy than any other major media establishment.

    In regards to the "Tucker Carlson" thing referenced above... he isn't a newscaster. This is how Fox, CNN, MSNBC all get away with lying and spreading misinformation. They are "opinion" people who happen to be on "News" channels.

    Want the truth? Dig for it. Read opposing viewpoints/sources and try to glean some of the truth from what you find. Even then you are unlikely to know the whole story.

    As for Donald Trump calling veterans "suckers" and "losers"... didnt happen. (My opinion.) I have seen too much of the guy to believe it. And John Bolton (who does not like Trump) said it didn't happen.

    Did he say something about Vietnam being pointless (or whatever he said)? Probably. But he wasn't referring to the soldiers on the ground. He was likely referring to the politicians and other people who make money off of wars while never getting their hands dirty. Viet Nam was pointless. (My opinion.)

    President Trump has been consistently pro-soldier, pro-military, and anti-war. I sometimes wonder if he is a fan of Aasimov's Foundation Trilogy, where one of the "heroes" of the book series has a motto: "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent."

    President Trump believes in negotiation backed up by potential military action (as a last resort).

    As for Baird - he is a Republican Party hack.

    He has climbed his way up from the ranks of county party politics, to where he sits now - thanks to the Republican party. His allegiance is to the party, not the public.

    And while I wish Raker was right - that he is wanting to dismantle socialism - Baird in fact merely wants to sound tough in order to garner votes. How long has he been in public office? And what has he done to actually make things better instead of merely increasing the public debt and handing out taxpayer candy(money) for votes?

    He and the majority of the others in Washington are all little piggies at the trough.

    Seriously - why would he want to dismantle medicaid/medicare when its literally his bread & butter? He owns a home health care service company. Most, if not all, of his billing is medicare/medicaid.

    Pig at the trough.

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 12:52 PM
  • He called John McCain a loser(FACT), is it really that much of a stretch that he said others were losers too?

    He 100% said those things, the man is of the lowest character possible. (My opinion)

    -- Posted by BJCP96 on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 1:08 PM
  • Dreadpiratesroberts true medicare is 100% a socialist program, but Baird probably makes an exception for that, since Republican politicians in general only seem to care about social programs when it's something that directly affects their life or they can benefit.

    -- Posted by Raker on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 1:31 PM
  • That is a position held by politicians in ALL parties.

    -- Posted by beg on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 2:03 PM
  • @ Ben Dover--everyone here scrutinizes everyone's posts here. What I choose to write is my business. Haven't heard much intelligence from you lately, though.

    @BJCP76--John McCain was a loser as a politician but, not as a veteran. President Trump has the utmost praise for all veterans. MSM is trying their level best to make up the most vile lies they can muster in an attempt to keep Trump from being re-elected. And you swallowed it hook, line, and sinker.

    -- Posted by donantonio on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 3:06 PM
  • @ Ben Dover--everyone here scrutinizes everyone's posts here. What I choose to write is my business. Haven't heard much intelligence from you lately, though.

    @BJCP76--John McCain was a loser as a politician but, not as a veteran. President Trump has the utmost praise for all veterans. MSM is trying their level best to make up the most vile lies they can muster in an attempt to keep Trump from being re-elected. And you swallowed it hook, line, and sinker.

    -- Posted by donantonio on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 3:06 PM
  • *

    BJCP - I will say that John McCain was a loser... as a politician, as a veteran (which is an opinion shared by many), and as a person.

    Raker - I am sure that Baird does make an exception... that was my point. He is no better than all the other piggies, of both parties, feeding at the trough of taxpayer money. And so long as he benefits (public be damned) he will support such socialist things, so you won't have to worry about that. Baird will say what he has to say to get elected but he has no principles which do not align with the Republican party...which is aligned with Big Government. Your precious social programs aren't going anywhere (unless I get into power! LOL).

    I don't like party politics... which is one reason why I like President Trump. He isn't a party guy. Sure, he ran as a Republican, but he used to hob-knob with all kinds of Democrats as well. He could've run as an independent but would've had about as much success as Perot. He hopped on the train that was most likely to get him there. (For the record, Trump was not my pick in the primary back when.)

    He probably does just as many things that I don't like as to do things that I do agree with.

    But I have no problems with one man trying to rack up "wins" to boost his ego (so long as they don't violate the Constitution or impinge upon my freedoms) when compared to the multi-headed hydra of big government.

    Trump wants his statue.

    Big Government wants my freedom.

    FYI: I support Donald Rainwater (Libertarian) for Governor.

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 3:36 PM
  • *

    DPR,

    I agree as a whole with your party politics analysis. I will however counter that Trump is 100% involved in party politics. He has zero interest in leading the country as a whole, or trying to unite the country and only panders to his base and those he feels will get him reelected. He is extremely divisive and that is party politics at its absolute worse. Regardless if he labels himself a republican or democrat. You can hate Clinton, Bush or Obama but they at least tried to reach both sides of an issue.

    I find it hard to marry the fact that you hate party politics with the fact you like Trump. (My Opinion)

    -- Posted by RSOTS on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 4:43 PM
  • DPR, we are not going to be able to reason with RSOTS. It is the main stream media, and social media, that has divided America. RSOTS is a dyed-in-the-wool Democrap who wants to see our country reduced to a heap of burning embers. Clinton, Bush, and Obummer did their level best to denigrate anything good. Clinton's with their body counts; Bush wasted billions of dollars bombing every where to kill Bin Laden; Obummer sent billions of dollars in cash to Iran. And this is my opinion.

    -- Posted by donantonio on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 5:03 PM
  • Draper?

    -- Posted by BJCP96 on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 5:22 PM
  • *

    DonA, sure media and social media are a large part to blame for the division in our country but they pale in comparison to the division that ignorance as you just displayed causes. You might disagree with my beliefs, thoughts and opinions as many on here have, but to claim that I want to "see our country reduced to a heap of burning embers" just because I don't support your views or your party / candidate is as divisive and un-american as you can get.

    They say ignorance is bliss and man you must be one happy son of a gun.

    Btw...I've never once in my life voted straight ticket for any party. Hopefully I don't have any spelling or grammar errors. ;)

    -- Posted by RSOTS on Wed, Sep 9, 2020, at 8:18 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: