Companies halting contributions donated more than $25,000 to Baird

Thursday, January 14, 2021
Jim Baird

His votes not to certify the electoral results of two battleground states could cost a Greencastle lawmaker if companies remain true to their current courses.

In the ongoing fallout of recent events in Washington, D.C., dozens of companies have announced they will pause or halt some or all political donations.

In objecting to the certification of electoral votes in both Arizona and Pennsylvania, Congressman Jim Baird (R-Greencastle) was among the more than 130 GOP representatives and eight senators who voted to object to at least one state’s electoral count.

In the aftermath, more than 60 companies have taken some action regarding future political donations. Some are halting donations to the specific lawmakers who voted against certification, while others are halting contributions for now regardless of political affiliation or voting record.

There is no guarantee how long these self-imposed prohibitions on donations will last, as many have said they are halting donations until they can assess the spending policies of their political action committees (PACs).

However, these decisions could have a financial impact on Baird and others.

During 2019 and 2020, nine of these companies were listed among the top 100 donors to the Baird campaign, according to information from OpenSecrets.org. Combined, they donated $28,800 to Baird in the 2019-20 cycle.

Those making donations to the Baird campaign included:

• AT&T: $6,000

• Comcast: $5,000

• Marathon Petroleum: $5,000

• Deloitte: $2,800

• Amazon.com: $2,500

• Blue Cross Blue Shield: $2,500

• Boeing: $2,000

• Lilly: $2,000

• CME Group: $1,000

It should be noted that the $2,800 from Deloitte came not from its PAC, but from an individual or individuals in the name of the company. Such donations may not be affected.

It also remains unclear what impact, if any, this could have on Baird if he runs for a third term in 2022. Some of the companies may reassess their strategy and decide to donate again at some point in the more than 21 months leading up to the 2022 election.

Additionally, new donors to Baird are likely to step in over that time.

However, their combined donations of $28,800 represented more than a quarter the total $112,874 in contributions during the previous cycle.

The dispute over certification of the electoral votes in the two states — an effort that failed in both chambers of Congress — was exacerbated by President Donald Trump’s continued claims that the election was “stolen” and the storming of the U.S. Capitol by Trump’s supporters while Congress had convened for certification.

In the days that have followed, the immediate fallout has been more political and legal than financial.

On Wednesday, the House of Representatives voted to impeach Trump for incitement of insurrection, making Trump the first president to be impeached twice.

Baird joined the other seven GOP members of the Indiana delegation in dissenting. Baird also voted against impeaching Trump in December 2019.

There have also been dozens of arrests of those who breached the Capitol, with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice warning the final total could number in the hundreds.

Comments
View 37 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Good job reporting of our representative votes supporting Trump!

    Senior Townee

    -- Posted by senior townee on Thu, Jan 14, 2021, at 3:42 PM
  • hmmmm

    -- Posted by beg on Thu, Jan 14, 2021, at 3:49 PM
  • He made a mistake.

    -- Posted by techphcy on Thu, Jan 14, 2021, at 5:01 PM
  • WE made the mistake.

    -- Posted by unbiased on Thu, Jan 14, 2021, at 6:50 PM
  • His base will remember and help him.

    -- Posted by savethebabies on Thu, Jan 14, 2021, at 8:05 PM
  • *

    LOL - Baird is a Republican Party tool. I hope he goes the way of the dinosaur.

    By the way, intrepid reporter... BLM and Antifa have been positively identified as being part of the mess at the Capitol on January 6th.

    Y'know - in case you want to update your story with facts and not simply bash supporters of PRESIDENT Trump.

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Fri, Jan 15, 2021, at 1:55 PM
  • Were there a few BLM supporters mixed in, most likely, I mean they did arrest ONE BLM organizer. I'm sure there were all kinds of trouble makers mixed in, people that probably dont even care about politics, just people looking to burn it all down. Lets be honest though the majority of the people that commited the terrorist attack on the Capital were Trump supporters. I'm sure thats a hard pill for you to swallow, but its just the facts. The beauty is its all well documented with videos and photos who the majority of the terrorist were.

    -- Posted by BJCP96 on Fri, Jan 15, 2021, at 2:03 PM
  • BJCP76---No, the majority of people that committed the terrorist attack on the Capital were people who were wearing clothing and hats that show the word "Trump". It is the bitter pill of propaganda the left and media want nitwits like you to swallow.

    -- Posted by donantonio on Fri, Jan 15, 2021, at 6:29 PM
  • Don, there is a term for people who are like Donald Trump.

    You know what there isn’t?

    Two terms.

    -- Posted by BJCP96 on Fri, Jan 15, 2021, at 7:05 PM
  • Like him or not,this is sooo hypocritical.Think of all the things that the politicians do and support.Most folks only find out months or even years later.It is as if you knew everything that friends,coworkers and family actually had done you would booty kick them.

    -- Posted by latewithtacos on Fri, Jan 15, 2021, at 8:48 PM
  • Donald Trump is still President of the United States of America. The election was rigged by deceitful and law-breaking Democrats. Let's wait until Jan. 20, 2021 and see what happens.

    -- Posted by donantonio on Fri, Jan 15, 2021, at 9:39 PM
  • *

    Oh Don. It's sad that you believe the lies but the saddest fact is all the lies that were fed to you and Trump's supporters. Trump did not win, there was not wide spread fraud, the election was free and fair and Biden will be the President come inauguration day. You have been lied to, misled and taken advantage of. I am truly sorry for you and the millions that were fed this propaganda by a traitor that was willing to try and incite a coup to stay in power after everything else had failed including 60+ legal challenges.

    -- Posted by RSOTS on Fri, Jan 15, 2021, at 10:13 PM
  • Jim will easily replace those lost funds by his QAnon buddies. All he has to do is keep drinking the Trump kool-aid, maybe Don and the Pirate can share a bit of their stash with him. Unless Don or the Pirate would like to run against Jim in the primary.

    -- Posted by Koios on Fri, Jan 15, 2021, at 10:29 PM
  • Perspectives are amazing.

    -- Posted by beg on Fri, Jan 15, 2021, at 11:37 PM
  • *

    Koios - LOL. Apparently you don't read the BG online much.

    I am posting against Mr. Baird every chance I get, and I will call out Republicans as well as any Democrat.

    I have no use for either. I believe in the Constitution and the ideals upon which this country was founded.

    If you are gonna throw shade, at least have the decency to know to whom you are throwing shade...

    Otherwise you will look kind of silly. Like now.

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Sat, Jan 16, 2021, at 12:23 AM
  • “By the way, intrepid reporter... BLM and Antifa have been positively identified as being part of the mess at the Capitol on January 6th.”

    That’s silly.

    -- Posted by Koios on Sat, Jan 16, 2021, at 1:02 AM
  • Lets see...

    Speaker Pelosi tells VP Pence that either he initiates the 25th amendment or she will begin 2nd impeachment trial in thirteen months

    no witnesses called, no evidence presented, no cross examination

    hmm...

    what's that legal term for this?

    -- Posted by direstraits on Sat, Jan 16, 2021, at 12:00 PM
  • Oh yeah...extortion

    -- Posted by direstraits on Sat, Jan 16, 2021, at 2:58 PM
  • Glad to see this article. Baird is a traitor and criminal. Cannot trust him at all.

    -- Posted by Queen53 on Sat, Jan 16, 2021, at 3:41 PM
  • Direstraits - I think you're confused. Extortion is when you call up the Attorney General of the state of Georgia and ask them to find votes because you lost and when they push back you make veiled threats.

    -- Posted by BJCP96 on Sat, Jan 16, 2021, at 4:10 PM
  • So, for all of the people preaching unity now, we really don't mean it. Unity is defined as agree with us and then we have unity.

    So, like Biden, we have a duly elected representative for our district. We should unify, as asked of us by the leader of the leftists. I will obey the calls of our incoming leader, the leftists calling for unity in the House, and in the Senate, and in the media.

    I will do my part and support our fairly and overwhelmingly elected representative, reach out in respect when I disagree. Reach out in a way that still promotes unity, has a respectful conversation, and respect the position of the person elected to represent my district.

    I feel all would want to obey the President Elect and seek unity.

    If you believe our Representative is the enemy, then we can follow the adage of loving our enemies or follow the example of President Lincoln and how He wanted the people who left the union to be treated.

    Our better nature is being tested. We have seen how leftist theology doesn't support our better nature. We have also seen how the alt-right (btw, not conservatives) doesn't support our better nature.

    Maybe moderates can be examples of seeking unity and common good above political philosophies. Find common ground, look for compromise that is less than what we may want but provides a positive step forward, and when we disagree, do it with respect and not cutting down the person we disagree with.

    We know the democratic party hate has failed. We know the alt right hate has failed. Let's give something different a chance.

    -- Posted by beg on Sat, Jan 16, 2021, at 5:07 PM
  • Everyone who is accused by law gets a trial to face their accusers and present evidence and cross examine witnesses.

    Even the worst among us.

    Whoever denies that doesn’t abide in the law.

    -- Posted by direstraits on Sat, Jan 16, 2021, at 6:29 PM
  • I'm disappointed that bc/bs gives donations to the political world. We have to have insurance.....so we pay the price. Is that why our insurance premiums are so high?

    -- Posted by Keepyaguessin on Sat, Jan 16, 2021, at 7:25 PM
  • If you don't support someone, no one is forcing you to support the PAC's that use your money to get them elected! PAC's are what has helped to corrupt the system!

    -- Posted by jake71 on Mon, Jan 18, 2021, at 2:55 AM
  • *

    Koios - Look up John Earle Sullivan (Jaden X)... and your silliness is showing again.

    Keepyaguessin - Many businesses/corporations butter both sides of the bread. They often give money to both sides in order to hedge their bets.

    And one party doesn't really care about the other party getting money b/c they are all in on it.

    When everyone is else is giving money, you can't afford to be the one that isn't. No one will listen to you.

    And as a congress-critter you can't not take the money b/c if you try to live by principle the rest will eat you alive.

    Its why most party-elite Republicans hate President Trump as much as Democrats.

    President Trump isn't a Republican party guy. He ran on the Republican ticket b/c it more aligned with his values and he had a better chance of getting elected that way. (Remember, Hillary was the foregone nominee for the Democrats in 2016 and 3rd party Presidential candidates are usually just spoilers.)

    Most Trump-supporting congress-critters (such as Mr. Baird) are only doing so b/c it is a political calculation made for re-election.

    At the end of the day Mr. Baird is a Republican Party hack that owes his allegiance to the Republican Party, not President Trump (for those to which this may matter) and not his constituents.

    Likewise BC/BS. They are selling you a product. They are not your friend. And they will do what they can to enrich themselves at the expense of others, including you.

    This is what happens when a country strays from its founding ideas of freedom & liberty.

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Mon, Jan 18, 2021, at 1:41 PM
  • "President Trump isn't a Republican party guy. He ran on the Republican ticket b/c it more aligned with his values and he had a better chance of getting elected that way"

    -- Trump is a opportunistic parasitic worm that pretended to be a democrat until he had his feelings hurt by President Obama. He most likely became a Republican because he felt that was the easiest group to manipulate. He doesnt care about anything other than power and money, he has zero values. -- Fixed that for ya.

    -- Posted by BJCP96 on Mon, Jan 18, 2021, at 2:09 PM
  • Pirate, the presence of one person at the embarrassing events at the US Capital who has repeatedly been seen at both leftist and rightest rallies does not mean Antifa/BLM was there. Take a look at the over 100 and counting other arrests. I would also suggest that you stop drinking the kool aid that QAnon, Newsmax, and OAN are serving. The latter two are just echo chambers spreading Trumps and Giulianis lies. You might want to take a break on those grainy YouTube videos as well, but I know that will be hard for you.

    -- Posted by Koios on Mon, Jan 18, 2021, at 2:35 PM
  • "This is what happens when a country strays from its founding ideas of freedom & liberty."

    Precisely! Again, DPR, well said!

    -- Posted by Prince of Stardust Hills on Mon, Jan 18, 2021, at 6:15 PM
  • Following the logic above, 100 out of our entire population or even the vote total for the President also quite small so I assume the poster believes that they don't represent that broader group.

    -- Posted by beg on Mon, Jan 18, 2021, at 7:57 PM
  • *

    Koios - I am not sure why you keep opening your mouth to prove how foolish you are... but there you go.

    There were - by estimates - well over 30K people there. Some of which were let into the capital, and a small handful of which acted atrociously. Most (97+%) were there peacefully. If MAGA people wanted to take that building, they probably had the numbers in which to do it.

    Now if we take an honest look at the modus operandi of the two groups in questions (Antifa/BLM as one and MAGA rally goers as another) we know that it is usually Antifa/BLM that destroy/riot while the MAGA people are usually very vocal but non-violent.

    Since we know that Antifa was there (and you don't seriously think this one guy, who is a leader in the movement, was there alone, do you?) - what do you think the odds are of those acting atrociously being Antifa/BLM? I would say the odds are probably good enough to put money on.

    And again, you have no idea what you are talking about in regards to my news gathering. I will simply attribute this to what seems to be limited intelligence and/or a fanatical devotion to willful ignorance, as evidenced by your words to date.

    I don't do political parties. I believe in America - as it was founded. I believe in the US Constitution. I believe in freedom and liberty.

    I would point you to some books for further reading but you would likely either burn them or eat the pages. More's the pity.

    BJCP - LOL - you didn't fix anything. All you have done is shown the world that you have a weird pathological hate for someone you don't even know or know much about.

    I feel sorry for you. What are you going to do when President Trump is no longer in office? Will you still look for him under your bed before you go to sleep? Will you still wake up with night terrors, drenched in sweat, afraid of what he might do even though he can't hurt you any more?

    Don't worry, the Two Minutes Hate will still be there, and you will still be told who your enemy is. No thinking required.

    You are 1984 type-cast.

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Tue, Jan 19, 2021, at 9:28 AM
  • *

    DPR - Lin Wood and Alex Jones just called. They are so proud of your work as a good foot soldier that they are asking you to step up and lead the local MAGA Cult Chapter 67. They feel that your strong delusions, inability to grasp reality, profound love of being on the wrong side of things and your general ability to keep talking even though you've already digested half of your boot make you the perfect fit for this office. They have listed the below qualifications in making this offer.

    MAGA's talking for weeks about Jan 6th - Must have been BLM/Antifa.

    MAGA's planning on social media for Jan 6th - Must have been BLM/Antifa.

    MAGA's bragging about the coming civil war - Must have been BLM/Antifa.

    Trump "Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!" - Must have been BLM/Antifa.

    Trump "If you are planning to attend peaceful protests in DC on the 6th, I recommend wearing a body camera. The more video angles of that day the better" - Must have been BLM/Antifa.

    Trump "If the liberal Democrats take the Senate and the White House — and they’re not taking this White House — we’re going to fight like hell, I’ll tell you right now" - Must have been BLM/Antifa.

    Trump "We’re going to take it back" - Must have been BLM/Antifa.

    Trump "We’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them, because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong." - Must have been BLM/Antifa.

    Rudy Giuliana "Trial by combat." - Must have been BLM/Antifa.

    Lauren Boebert “Remember these next 48 hours. These are some of the most important days in American history.” - Must have been BLM/Antifa.

    Lauren Boebert “Today is 1776.” - Must have been BLM/Antifa.

    MAGA's posting countless videos of them at / in the Capitol - Must have been BLM/Antifa.

    MAGA's posting countless pictures / social media messages of themselves at / in the Capitol - Must have been BLM/Antifa.

    Mountains of evidence piling up, multiple arrest's of MAGA's - Must have been BLM/Antifa.

    Social Media posts from MAGA's bragging about storming the Capitol - Must have been BlM/Antifa.

    And on and on and on and on.....

    If you can say that only a small percentage of Trump supporters were violent, opportunistic to cause damage, were destroying property, were breaking the law, etc... but you can't apply the same logic to the BLM protests then you are willfully ignorant.

    If you can say that BLM - Antifa showed up to make Trump supporters look bad / derail their cause but can't apply the same logic to BLM protests then you are willfully ignorant.

    If you can say that the bad actions of a few shouldn't represent the whole but you can't apply the same logic to BLM then you are willfully ignorant.

    -- Posted by RSOTS on Tue, Jan 19, 2021, at 3:38 PM
  • Glad to see you are condemning violence. We have that in common.

    I will continue to search for unity in the communications of division.

    -- Posted by beg on Tue, Jan 19, 2021, at 6:22 PM
  • *

    What is that noise?

    Oh, its just that annoying gadfly again, lapping up and regurgitating fecal matter.

    Folks, in case you might be distracted by the buzzing of gadflies, let me clear a few things up:

    The events at the capitol were stupid and ill-advised...regardless of who was involved. I have never said differently.

    I admonished the writer to include Antifa/BLM as being a "part of" (not sole participants) the events at the Capitol in contrast to their statement about it being supporters of President Trump, implied solely.

    Kiois challenged my statement. I provided proof.

    He rebutted with what amounts to "one does not mean all". (Funny that he and his fellow travellers wish to paint supporters of President Trump with the same brush from which he seeks refuge.)

    I presented an argument based on logic, reason, probability, and historical reference simply supporting the idea that where there is one there are likely more Antifa/BLM persons inciting violence. Not all, but surely more.

    Nowhere did I say that all supporters of President Trump were blameless. In fact, I have read of several that are openly proud of it. I am aware that there are those whose passions are easily enflamed regardless of their political persuasions.

    Then comes the lateral attack and the changing of angles of attack b/c this is what the left does. They like to pivot. Here we have a string of quotes posted designed to pivot the focus. While it would be easy to post a string of quotes from the likes of prominent Democrat politicians doing the exact same thing, it would really serve no purpose other than to allow those trying to engage the pivot to succeed in their obfuscation.

    And in case you have missed it in my hundreds of posts on this newspapers website: I don't like over-reaching government whether "right" or "left" and have no problems calling out ANY politician (including President Trump) that deviates from the letter and spirit of the US Constitution, based on the ideals of liberty and freedom.

    The leftist believes in "the ends justify the means", and those ends are the destruction of liberty and freedom.

    This is not to say that there aren't those who claim to be on the right that would also curtail your liberty and freedom for the sake of their vision of government, and usually their own power.

    Its too bad more people don't know the history that many others are eager to repeat and inflict upon them.

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Wed, Jan 20, 2021, at 9:42 AM
  • Pirate "Kiois challenged my statement. I provided proof."

    You provided about as much "proof" as Rudy did during the "election fraud" hoax. You provided one name, that of a shadowy figure who routinely shows up to protests inspired by both radical right and radical left groups. Only Rudy would call that proof. On second thought, Sidney would probably also.

    -- Posted by Koios on Wed, Jan 20, 2021, at 11:55 AM
  • *

    Koios - LOL. Is it really that difficult for you?

    The guy - who is far from shadowy - has admitted to being a part of BLM and Antifa .

    The guy was arrested for his part in the shenanigans at the Capitol.

    But I do appreciate you making my point.

    You are so rigidly ideological (and likely partisan) that you cannot have a simple discussion or simply admit the obvious.

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Wed, Jan 20, 2021, at 1:52 PM
  • "You are so rigidly ideological (and likely partisan) that you cannot have a simple discussion or simply admit the obvious." Actually that sounds a lot more like you. I live in a reality based on facts, not half truths, speculation and conjecture based on what I want to believe is true, just because it fits an agenda.

    -- Posted by Koios on Wed, Jan 20, 2021, at 2:01 PM
  • DPR, you are, indeed, rigidly ideological. Your absolute insistence in interpreting America's constitution in favor of individual liberty and freedom will win you less and less friends as time progresses, especially as the country's appreciation for and knowledge of history continues to wane.

    -- Posted by Prince of Stardust Hills on Wed, Jan 20, 2021, at 3:24 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: