SBOA report alleges misconduct by Galloways

Thursday, May 27, 2021
Cheryl and Wayne Galloway

CLOVERDALE — A report by the Indiana State Board of Accounts (SBOA) has alleged overcompensation and mismanagement by former Cloverdale Clerk-Treasurer Cheryl Galloway and her husband Wayne, Cloverdale’s former town manager and building inspector.

Stating that it covers activity in the period between January 2019 and March 2020, the report outlines its allegations in terms of misconduct with management of payrolls and salary expectations.

The report first notes in its background that Mr. Galloway was hired as the Cloverdale town manager in May 2015. He was later named the town’s interim building inspector in August 2017.

The report also states that the Cloverdale Town Council met in executive session on March 17, 2020 to discuss alleged misconduct of Mr. Galloway. It says that then-Town Attorney Daniel Hofmann issued a letter to Galloway to, “memorialize the Town Council’s decision terminating your employment.” The letter directed Galloway to vacate his office on March 27, 2020.

This has been contested by the Galloways, who have put forward that Wayne’s termination was illegally decided on in a closed session. The council publicly announced his termination during a public meeting held on April 14, 2020.

The report provides that Mr. Galloway’s approved salary as the building inspector was $13,256 in 2017, $20,000 in 2018 and then $20,000 in 2019. The council then approved the rate at $40,000 for 2020. It was stated then that this was meant to help attract a committed employee.

The report argues, however, that Mr. Galloway was never named the building inspector or approved to receive the $40,000. It states that Clerk-Treasurer Galloway reported to the council in March 2020 that her husband was receiving $20,000. While this was confirmed, Mr. Galloway’s payroll indicated the $40,000 instead.

The report notes that in 2020, Mr. Galloway’s salary as the town manager was $1,856 per pay and $769.23 per pay as the building inspector. This totaled to $2,625.23. However, his building inspector pay was allegedly changed to $1,538 per pay, totaling $3,364 per pay for the first seven pay periods in 2020.

For a payroll ending on April 5, 2020 and paid out on April 10, 2020, Mr. Galloway was paid for a partial pay period and compensated for unused vacation and sick hours. The report provides that only unused vacation hours can be paid when an employee quits.

The SBOA requested that the couple reimburse the town $9,119.27 for the alleged overcompensation. The agency also requested that they reimburse the state $5,600.25 for special investigation costs, including an initial investigation by the Indiana State Police. Additionally, it provides that the final paycheck issued to Mr. Galloway for $3,424 was returned to the town and voided.

The report puts forward that the town council, “did not always review the detail of the payroll claims before approving them.” Additionally, it has been charged that Mr. Galloway did not duly segregate his duties as the town manager, the building inspector and doing payroll.

The report also provides that Mr. Galloway’s time cards were not approved during the period in question, or that there were not proper internal controls in place to keep town records and property secure.

The report notes that its contents were discussed in February 2021 with Clerk-Treasurer Kelly Maners, council members Rick Dearwester and Gary Bennington and Town Attorney Richard Shagley. Likewise, the Galloways and attorney Mark Waterfill were shown the report early in March.

Comments
View 6 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • So the Town Council screwed up and didn't pay attention and want the Galloways to pay for the investigation? And the TC approved the $40,000 for the building inspector in 2020 but not if Galloway was the building inspector? The SBOA finds the Galloways responsible, and they are, but shouldn't the TC bear some responsibility for their own failures?

    -- Posted by unbiased on Thu, May 27, 2021, at 4:25 PM
  • Karma

    -- Posted by Keepyaguessin on Thu, May 27, 2021, at 4:32 PM
  • Unbiased: It's the SBOA wanting restitution for their investigation, not the town council.

    -- Posted by Ben Dover on Fri, May 28, 2021, at 1:36 PM
  • Ben, I know that but I think the Town Council should bear that responsibility.

    -- Posted by unbiased on Fri, May 28, 2021, at 3:53 PM
  • Did the Galloway's agree to pay for the SBOA investigation beforehand and to accept, if found guilty, the determination of ALLEGED guilt and pay a penalty?

    From the outside, looking in, and from not too far away, it appears a bit confusing and HIGHLY unlikely.

    -- Posted by Prince of Stardust Hills on Fri, May 28, 2021, at 7:17 PM
  • cloverdale politics are entertaining, are none of you people down there friends?

    -- Posted by davide_norris on Sat, May 29, 2021, at 12:00 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: