County Council approves POET for abatement

Wednesday, May 18, 2022

POET Biorefining has made no decision on whether it will resume production at its Cloverdale facility.

However, state and local officials are doing their best to offer incentives for POET to come back to Putnam County.

On Tuesday, the Putnam County Council approved a five-year abatement for the Cloverdale facility, should the company choose to resume corn-based ethanol production locally.

On the table were two possibilities for the Council to consider — a 10-year abatement with county taxes on personal property and real estate phased in for 10 percent more each year until completion and a five-year total abatement, in which the company would pay no such taxes for five years and then begin paying a full tax bill in the sixth year.

The Council, in a unanimous decision, ultimately chose the five-year plan, which also includes a “claw-back” option, which Greencastle/Putnam County Development Center Executive Director Kristin Clary explained means that if POET should shutter the facility before the term is up, the county can use legal action to get back all abated taxes.

This is important, as the facility has actually closed twice since 2008.

It first opened as Altra Biofuels in April 2008, but was shuttered eight months later. POET then acquired the property in 2010 and had a much better run before idling production in 2019.

At that time, POET had an ongoing abatement and the Council, though it did not pursue already abated taxes, did not grant future abatement on the property.

POET has already been approved for tax credits from the Indiana Economic Development Corp. should the Cloverdale site be chosen.

State and local officials hope that the tax breaks and other factors will be enough to woo the POET board to choose Cloverdale over facilities in Iowa and the company’s home base of South Dakota.

Should the Cloverdale facility be chosen, it would not only provide local jobs, but an outlet for local farmers to sell corn.

“It is a huge asset to farmers and to employees,” Clary said. “They pay well.”

Comments
View 3 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • And if they choose us, they will be gone again in year six. Hope those five years are worth it.

    -- Posted by The Crusty Curmudgeon on Thu, May 19, 2022, at 12:55 PM
  • *

    1) They had another option: NO ABATEMENTS, which would've been the better choice.

    2) Burning food for fuel is pretty stupid... especially when there is about to be global food shortages (per certain circles).

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Sat, May 21, 2022, at 6:26 PM
  • DPR

    I think if you look at stats, a very small portion of dent corn production is used for food. Some starch, syrup, and probably a few other things. Most used for feed, which there is plenty inventory, and other commercial uses

    Your abatement argument may have some merit. Not sure the corn as ethynol vs food is quite as strong

    -- Posted by beg on Tue, May 24, 2022, at 1:46 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: