Commissioners hear argument for county redistricting

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

GREENCASTLE -- The Putnam County Commissioners heard a compelling argument for the redistricting of county council seats at Monday's meeting.

DePauw Professor Kelsey Kauffman brought several members of her class to discuss the findings of their recent redistricting study. They reported that counties, just like the state, are required to look at redrawing district lines every 10 years, following each census. By contrast, DePauw student Tyler Hess told the commissioners Putnam County has not redrawn its districts in nearly half a century.

The study further pointed out the Supreme Court has ruled the maximum deviation in population between districts should be no more than 10 percent. In Putnam County, it is 80 percent.

The commissioners thanked the class for their findings and asked why they had not also looked at redistricting for commissioners. Kauffman said they disparity in commissioner districts is less of an issue since all three are elected at large.

Floyd Township residents Gregg Earnest and Heath Warren shared concerns about the condition of County Road 400 East with the commissioners. Rather than simply expressing their unhappiness with road conditions, they asked where the funding comes from, if there is a road replacement plan and who they could contact about better funding in the county.

Commissioner Gene Beck said one of the chief problems in the state's funding formula is it's based on the number of registered cars in a county. Trucks and SUVs do not count as part of the formula.

This formula tends to favor urban and suburban counties over the state's rural counties.

The commissioners suggested contacting Rep. Jim Baird and Sen. Connie Lawson about possibly changing the funding formula.

County highway co-supervisor Jim Smith added that any funding set aside for road repairs can be taken away when the county has disastrous weather. The county is already well over its yearly budget for salt and sand, and the additional funds have come from the road budget.

Recent floods have also taken some of the money, as more serious road repairs take precedence.

With no easy answers at the county level, Commissioner Nancy Fogle thanked the two men for their understanding.

"I really appreciate you guys' attitude," Fogle said. "So many people are so irate when they call."

Comments
View 2 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Great reporting on this meeting,appreciate the honest facts presented to print for those that can't attend meetings...good job,Jared!

    -- Posted by kubotafan on Wed, Mar 9, 2011, at 5:45 PM
  • Rep. Baird is working on the matter of road funding and his office has been helpful in explaining and asking for input on this matter. Senator Lawson (after a number of calls, emails, and weeks)explained the 2 different funding formulas used and that was the fairest way to divide the money. When I explained that I would simply like to keep the county money in the county instead of the state handing out how they see fit she said that for every dollar we give to a rural area we have to take from an urban one. The information she gave was helpful but the attitude towards rural areas was not.I urge anyone concerned to contact these offices but please be respectful,it does no good to rant and rave. They won't take you serious if you just cuss and yell.

    -- Posted by worrieddaddy on Wed, Mar 9, 2011, at 9:41 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: