Puppy mill owners plead guilty to tax evasion

Monday, January 11, 2010

INDIANAPOLIS -- The owner of a commercial dog-breeding operation the state shut down pleaded guilty Friday to felony tax-evasion charges and will have to spend part of her sentence cleaning animal cages.

Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller said he would next seek to collect a tax judgment of $193,700 that she owes the state.

In Marion County Superior Criminal Court 15 Friday, Tammy Gilchrist pleaded guilty to two Class D felonies -- failure to remit or collect sales tax and failure to permit examination of sales-tax records.

Under the plea agreement with the State of Indiana, Gilchrist was sentenced to two years, suspended. As part of her probation, Gilchrist must perform 40 hours of community service at the Animal Welfare League of Montgomery County, where she will not directly handle pets, but must clean animal cages.

"Hoosiers can be doubly harmed by scam artists who not only defraud consumers but the state through tax evasion," said deputy attorney general Andrew Swain, chief counsel of the Attorney General's Revenue Division. "The Attorney General's Office is combating these unscrupulous acts on two fronts, through consumer protection mechanisms and through tax laws to ensure businesses are meeting both state and consumer obligations."

Gilchrist and co-owner Walter Workman operated a commercial dog-breeding business known by various names, including Kritter Heaven in Cloverdale, which was the subject of numerous consumer complaints. In March 2006, then-Attorney General Steve Carter filed a consumer-fraud lawsuit against Gilchrist and her company, alleging Gilchrist failed to deliver puppies customers had paid for or delivered diseased puppies that were misrepresented as being healthy. The lawsuit seeking consumer restitution is ongoing; a hearing on the state's default judgment is set for next month.

Alleging that Gilchrist failed to collect or remit approximately $193,000 in sales tax owed from her puppy transactions, the Attorney General's Office on Dec. 23, 2008, served a warrant at Gilchrist's puppy mill and seized 74 dogs and puppies that were caged in squalid conditions, as well as four horses.

Gilchrist's retail merchant license later was revoked and the Attorney General's Office obtained an injunction prohibiting her from selling dogs.

Under the Attorney General's legal authority to bring criminal charges of sales-tax evasion on behalf of the Department of Revenue, Zoeller's office later charged Gilchrist with five Class D felony counts and two misdemeanors. Charges were filed in Marion County because Indianapolis is the seat of state government.

Also charged with similar counts were Workman and Gilchrist's employee Julie Herrick. In October 2009, Herrick pleaded guilty to failing to remit or collect sales tax, was sentenced to probation and agreed to testify against Gilchrist if Gilchrist's case went to trial.

Friday's guilty plea by Gilchrist to two felony charges, with the remaining counts dismissed, resolves her criminal case. The Attorney General's Office previously obtained a tax judgment in Owen County against Gilchrist for the unpaid sales tax, plus interest, which as of Dec. 23, 2009, totaled $193,700. In collecting the tax amount owed, the State can garnishee wages or seize property.

Workman also pleaded guilty Friday to one count of failure to remit or collect sales tax and was sentenced to one year of probation. Gilchrist, Workman and Herrick are forbidden from selling or breeding dogs while on probation.

Since the December 2008 enforcement action against Gilchrist's puppy mill, the Attorney General's Office has filed sales-tax evasion charges against the operators of two other businesses: an Elkhart merchant who sold poor-quality stereo equipment out of parking lots without collecting sales tax and a Harrison County puppy mill that sold puppies without collecting sales tax. The stereo case ended in a guilty plea; the dog-breeders' case is ongoing.

Friday's guilty pleas by Gilchrist and Workman come as a new state law regulating puppy mills went into full effect Jan. 1.

The new law passed last April by the Indiana General Assembly, House Enrolled Act 1468, gives county prosecutors greater ability to file criminal charges for animal neglect and animal cruelty. The law sets basic requirements for dog breeders to provide food, water and exercise to their dogs.

It created a new registry of commercial dog breeders and dog brokers through the State Board of Animal Health (SBoA), and requires breeders and brokers to register annually and pay registration fees, based on the number of unaltered dogs they own.

The Attorney General's Office enforces a provision of the new law with SBoA. If breeders or brokers fail to register or misrepresent the number of dogs they own, then the Attorney General's Office can seek civil penalties of between $500 and $5,000 or seek a court injunction to require violators to stop selling dogs. Those who fail to pay registration fees could be required to pay double, under the new law.

Comments
View 3 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Perhaps a week in a 4'x6' cage without bathroom facilities and minimal food and water would give

    convicted puppy millers a taste of the mistreatment they have inflicted on helpless animals.

    -- Posted by mothersue on Mon, Jan 11, 2010, at 11:06 AM
  • It will take this person many years, perhaps a whole lifetime, to pay restitution. I hope the State follows through with every penny! Persistent economic pressure is the only way to constantly bring to this persons mind the suffering that she forced on these breading dogs and puppies. Shameful! 40 hours of community service cleaning cages is NOT enough! I have volunteered to clean cages in the past and I did it to offer dogs comfort until a permanent home could be found. This person does not even deserve to clean up after animals. Too bad they did not sentence her clean toilets in prison! That would be more fitting.

    -- Posted by Hairy Tiger on Mon, Jan 11, 2010, at 12:51 PM
  • Shame on these people. I witnessed first hand this weekend (north-west of Greencastle, around Dunbar Bridge) the way ignorant and thoughtless people can be, by leaving behind two small, short-haired dogs outside in a 4 x 5 pen, in the freezing cold since Thanksgiving. Family left, leaving these two dogs alone. NO FOOD, NO WATER, since Thanksgiving. Maybe they should be put in a 4 x 5 pen outside, no shelter from the cold rains, snow and freezing nights. I'd like to know if I as a citizen of this county could see to it that they are prosecuted to the fullest. Slap a fine on THESE HEARTLESS humans and I'll bet they won't do this again to any animal. I hope they don't treat their children this way.

    -- Posted by whodouthinkur on Mon, Jan 11, 2010, at 2:14 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: