City councilmen plan to introduce non-discrimination resolution

Friday, April 10, 2015

Two Greencastle City Council members want to assure the city remains a welcoming place for one and all.

So when the City Council conducts its April meeting at 7 p.m. Tuesday at City Hall, Council President Adam Cohen, a Democrat, and Fourth Ward Councilman Tyler Wade, a Republican, will introduce a non-discrimination resolution.

Adam Cohen

"The last few weeks have painted Indiana in a poor light," Council President Cohen said without directly referring to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) that created such a firestorm when it was passed by the Indiana Legislature last month. "I want to make sure, as best I can, that people know that Greencastle is a place that I hope welcomes everyone."

Wade, youngest and newest member of the City Council, echoed those sentiments.

"It's been hard to go anywhere these last few weeks without seeing Indiana painted in a negative light," he said. "Communities across this state have spoken out, and we wanted to join the chorus to let the world know Indiana is open for business for all.

"We felt it was vital to make a strong statement that Greencastle is open and inviting to everyone," Wade added.

Cohen and Wade expect that their fellow City Council members -- Jinsie Bingham, Mark Hammer and Phyllis Rokicki -- will agree when they introduce the resolution at the public meeting Tuesday.

"This is a first step," Cohen told the Banner Graphic. "We have been doing things behind the scenes at the city level but this resolution will continue to push us to do more and be more deliberate about it.

"Our goal is to pass this resolution showing where we stand," he added, "then back it up with real regulations. We, as a community, stand for inclusion. We welcome all productive citizens to live and visit this city."

Tyler Wade

The resolution directs the president of City Council -- which is Cohen -- to appoint a committee to work on bringing all city laws and policies in line with the non-discrimination statement.

"I have great confidence that the committee will be able to come up with meaningful proposals to change city code so we can put into practice the principles we preach," Wade told the Banner Graphic. "I look forward to reviewing these recommendations and putting them into city code."

The resolution reads as follows:

"Whereas, the City of Greencastle has made it a priority to welcome and promote diversity among its citizens, visitors and businesses; and

"Whereas, the city believes it is a fundamental right for all employees, residents and visitors to feel secure and welcome; and

"Whereas, the city feels the need to reaffirm its commitment to diversity and inclusion through laws and ordinances that protect individuals from discrimination; and

"Whereas, non-discriminatory legislation furthers a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest.

"Therefore, be it resolved that the Common Council of the City of Greencastle hereby:

"1. Adopts the philosophy, that all city offices and companies that do business with the city should not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, ethnicity, disability, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, national origin, ancestry, age or United States military veteran status, except where these statuses are a bona fide qualification for employment or otherwise allowed by law.

"2. Charges that city policies and procedures be revised where applicable to reflect this philosophy.

"3. Directs the president of City Council to appoint a committee to work on bringing all city laws and policies in line with this statement."

Comments
View 11 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Let me point something out......"Our goal is to pass this resolution showing where we stand," he added, "then back it up with real regulations. We, as a community, stand for inclusion. We welcome all productive citizens to live and visit this city." Uh-oh, you apparently don't welcome 'unproductive' citizens to live or visit Greencastle? Isn't that discriminatory?

    This whole idea of passing resolutions or regulations to prove that Greencastle welcomes everyone is ridiculous. The best way to show the world that Greencastle welcomes all is to simply live by the Golden Rule.....'do unto others as you would have others do unto you'. Most of us live with this philosophy every day. And a resolution isn't going to change the attitude or behavior of those who don't live by the Golden Rule.

    -- Posted by kamare on Fri, Apr 10, 2015, at 8:46 PM
  • I am proud of our councilmen (and my town) for taking the time to introduce this non-discrimination resolution. There are many counties in Indiana that do not adhere to this and will fight tooth and nail to continue their discriminatory practices until it is legislated otherwise. It is nice to see Greencastle being proactive!

    -- Posted by Carla Hurst-Chandler on Sat, Apr 11, 2015, at 7:46 AM
  • Such stupid grandstanding by these two as this resolution does absolutely nothing other than hopefully gain them some brownie points as supposed 'big thinkers'. This is what is totally wrong with politics, wasting time and effort on unnecessary garbage.

    -- Posted by taylortwp on Sat, Apr 11, 2015, at 7:48 AM
  • I agree with both of you big boy 1 and Kamare.

    I think in the long-run all who want to force others to agree with their vain philosophies, will have a heavy price to pay. That price will last forever. Mr. Wade I hope I'm not the only vote in your district you lose this election.

    -- Posted by WONDER on Sat, Apr 11, 2015, at 11:29 AM
  • Kamare, big boy 1 and WONDER--

    I appreciate and understand your concerns and I hope you will come to Tuesday's meeting to express them.

    I would be happy to meet with anyone who would like to know more about why I support this resolution or any other business concerning the City.

    If you would like to set up a time to meet, please e-mail me at tjwade12@gmail.com

    I hope to see many of you Tuesday and I look forward to the conversation.

    All the best,

    Tyler J. Wade

    Greencastle

    -- Posted by tjwade12 on Sat, Apr 11, 2015, at 11:50 AM
  • If this passes who is going to oversee and investigate every entity that does business with the city to be sure they don't discriminate? Not practical at all and does nothing. I tend to agree with big boy 1 about grandstanding. What was the point of sharing this with the paper before it had gone to the City Council, other than grandstanding? Or perhaps to put undo pressure on your fellow councilmen to pass it? Not sure, but I hope this DOES NOT get a rubber stamp of approval from other council members.

    -- Posted by 3m50 on Sat, Apr 11, 2015, at 2:08 PM
  • It is impossible to legislate morality. Does the city council have no other pressing business to take care of in Greencastle?

    -- Posted by donantonioelsabio on Sun, Apr 12, 2015, at 1:52 PM
  • Well said big boy 1 ,I totally agree

    -- Posted by Falcon9 on Sun, Apr 12, 2015, at 5:51 PM
  • Rather than seeing this resolution as an end point, I believe that it is an important first step toward ensuring that we, as a community, recognize that work needs to be done in order to provide a place where everyone has equal access. This is a good place to live and to work, but words are powerful and having this anti-discrimination policy in place sets a standard, against which we can all measure ourselves and our community.

    -- Posted by Maeve04 on Mon, Apr 13, 2015, at 1:46 PM
  • Do the Editor's or any Council members understand the 1st Amendment? Religious Freedom (originally here in USA, people mainly of Christianity, definitely people of good-moral conscience) was the very first issue addressed. I'd say it was of great importance to our Founder's and the citizens alike. As it should be. We all will answer someday for our actions of good and bad. Eternity has two options. Choose this day whom you will serve.

    To tell someone NO, is not criminal action.

    Around 5 AM this morning there was a post on here that told the truth of what is really going on. Why have you 2x now, disregarded the persons 1st Admendment right of free speech?

    Are you going to stomp on mine too?

    -- Posted by WONDER on Tue, Apr 14, 2015, at 11:50 AM
  • Probably, WONDER. This is just more grandstanding by politicians, regardless of party affiliation. R's are just trying to distance themselves from any "discrimination" tags being bandied about, and the D's are just stirring the pot of bleeding hearts who don't even know what RFRA is REALLY about.

    As Abdul Shabazz said about the whole ordeal, "Its not what its actually ABOUT, its how it LOOKS."

    Hence, you get ridiculous "resolutions" that politicians can then put on their resumes as they climb the political ladder.

    Remember, the only protected "free speech" is when it comes from the proverbially eternal "squeaky wheels," who could find a reason to complain about ANYTHING. All other voices are to be silenced. They show this time and again. Then act high and mighty over their self proclaimed "enlightened" stance. Opposition and free thought are discouraged. Obey the "accepted" line of thinking...or else.

    -- Posted by stranded67 on Fri, Apr 17, 2015, at 8:55 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: