Assessed value dropping in Cloverdale

Sunday, July 10, 2016

CLOVERDALE -- During the June regular meeting of the Cloverdale Town Council, Clerk-Treasurer Cheryl Galloway reported that the recent total assessed value rate of the town had come in at $10 million, the exact amount that the rates have dropped in the last five years.

Assessed value rates are measurements of real estate value used to calculate property taxes. In a letter to residents Clerk-Treasurer Galloway handed out at the meeting, she explained what their decline means for Cloverdale residents.

"It means our town is getting less money to put into our roads and sidewalks," she wrote. "It means the budget for the police has been cut, again, and the ability to help the Fire Department in purchasing gear is not there, and taking care of hazards such as dead trees that threaten resident's property. All this funding comes from taxes."

Clerk-Treasurer Galloway went on to say that the 113 vacant properties within Cloverdale are significant contributors to the rates' chronic decline, and Cloverdale has advertised the properties to businesses like Totally Whole Business Partners and the Roachdale Revitalization Cooperative Alliance in hopes that they would be interested in flipping them.

"Our historic downtown businesses have been affected because the curb appeal is not there," she wrote. "This council will do anything to open doors to support businesses in this community. If you need help opening a door, our door is always open."

While other efforts -- like seeking a Revitalization Grant, installing a small rest park and a horse park, and marketing the town on Facebook and Cloverdalein.com -- are already being pursued, Clerk-Treasurer Galloway plans to ask the council to consider approving a flat wastewater fee on all properties that have been vacant for an extended period of time.

As a last resort, she said the town would inspect each property and, after offering owners a chance to improve its value, would purchase it for demolition.

"This town council and I will continue looking for ways to improve our lives as citizens of this quaint little community we call our home," Clerk-Treasurer Galloway concluded. "We ask for your understanding, help and volunteering."

In other developments:

-- The council tabled a decision to accept a settlement in litigation involving payment of a $3,000 utility bill from the former Midway Motel. Larry Fidler moved to accept $3,000, but was not seconded. Gary Bennington suggested settling for the cost of water and sewer penalties at a total of $3,001.79, but ultimately the council could not decide on a dollar amount and how the payment would be received.

-- The council approved payment of $1,144 to a mediator.

-- The council approved the new accounting charges set at $600 per month in a 4-1 vote with Gary Bennington abstaining. The previous charges were $380 per month.

-- Clerk-Treasurer Galloway reported that she is currently seeking cheaper health insurance for the town.

-- The council tabled a request, received in a May 9 letter, for $2,200 from the Putnam County Animal Care and Control until the next council meeting on July 12.

-- The town has officially purchased property at 900 South to be used for a horse park at a cost of $40,000. The town is currently seeking suggestions for a name.

-- The council approved installing a new water line at the intersection of Water Street and Hurst Street at a cost of $4,025. The existing line has been repaired six times, which Attorney Alan Yackey said would make the town liable for any damages resulting from another break.

-- The council approved moving the water treatment plant security gate back at a cost of $3,700. The purpose of the move is to improve access to the water pump for users, who pay a fee. The board also approved adopting a water-use swipe card for the users.

-- The council approved vacating an east-west alley between Summerfield Nursing Home and Marathon Gas Station.

-- The council approved Ordinance 2016-3, which concerns time periods for vehicle storage and other matters, and Ordinance 2016-4, which clarified Town Code on permit requirements, fees and charges. Ordinances can be viewed at www.cloverdalein.com.

-- The council approved leaving U-Drive off of Logan Street as a two-way. The council had considered making it a one-way, but survey participants voted against it in a 14-3 vote.

In other business:

-- The council approved the June claims at a total of $280,438.43, which is a $68,000 decrease from the May claims and a $26,000 decrease from the January-June average of $306,000 per month.

The next town council meeting will be at 7 p.m. Tuesday, July 12 in the Town Hall. A public hearing to address questions and concerns about the Revitalization Grant application process will be July 13 at 6:45 p.m. in the Town Hall.

Comments
View 11 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • oh boy! Tax & spend more. Revenues down. How is this a formula for success?

    Why in the world would any business want to invest here with this sort of bully government?

    Not much in this report to get excited about for the future of Cloverdale, but a good report from the B-G! Thank you!

    -- Posted by letspulltogether on Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 8:50 AM
  • Wow! First it was free driveway material from the town streets for the Clerk and her "town manger" husband's driveway now cutting of budgets and wasting money on a horse park? I don't care if they got $40k in free grant money to buy the property. If they spend $10 on it, it is $10 that should have went to public safety. When the faucets pour liquid gold and we have to pay for it there should be no surprise why you have 113 vacant properties. Also who wants to invest in those properties only to have to spend money on sewer bills if they are vacant! The board, the clerk, her husband, and all their friends need to go. They can take the overpaid attorney, overpaid building inspector, and their paid administrative leave "police chief" with them. Once that is done there might actually be money for public safety and public works. This is your Cloverdale Hometown Charm!

    -- Posted by CdaleResident on Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 11:19 AM
  • Theres a hole lot of truth above!!

    -- Posted by becker on Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 5:31 PM
  • Horse park? Haha. Why in the world would you build a horse park. Did we need one before c bar c was built? Or is this to pacify c bar c. Something is not right and we will all see it after the fact...when it is too late.

    -- Posted by canttakeitanymore on Tue, Jul 12, 2016, at 8:23 AM
  • And why would you advertise to the roachdale revitalization group. Look at their downtown. They cannot attract viable businesses themselves. Be careful what they can promise

    -- Posted by canttakeitanymore on Tue, Jul 12, 2016, at 8:25 AM
  • Kudos to "CdaleResident" you said it all!

    Cloverdale Town Council, Are you installing hitching post for the downtown businesses to accomodate the Horse Park travelers? Does this mean Cloverdale residents can keep horses in order to utilize the $40,000.00 horse park?

    One question for the Banner Graphic....Why does it take your Staff Writer, Ms Chelsea Modglin, who covers the Cloverdale Town Hall Meetings, so long to publish these articles? The June 14th Town Hall Meeting finally published on July 10th with the July 12th Town Hall meeting today. Reporting the news should be accurate and published in a timely manner, just saying.

    -- Posted by cowgirl46135 on Tue, Jul 12, 2016, at 1:13 PM
  • Wow....a $40,000 horse park. And this council expects volunteers to maintain this. The volunteers have their hands full with more important things such as helping with various programs for the youth in the community and also public safety. How can they do this.....this just makes no sense at all....especially with cutting funding for police and fire department.

    How much is insurance on this "horse park" gonna cost taxpayers? NOthing is free!

    113 vacant properties, have they stopped to count the abandoned vehicles? Why is the council and building inspector not taking action and cleaning this issue up. Is it because the Marshall is on paid administrative leave? Hmmmmm.......

    -- Posted by captain crunch on Tue, Jul 12, 2016, at 5:57 PM
  • Well said by everyone. When you receive grant money (free money as everyone calls it), do you really believe it grows on trees? That free money ultimately comes from taxes that everyone pays. If the government has that much money to give out dont you think they are over taxing in the first place? All grant money that is given out in the U.S. could pave all roads. Give fire departments the equipment that they need. Police departments what they need. But no....lets put in a horse park in cloverdale. Did they ever State how many acres that $40,000 paid for. Ins. And liability comes next cloverdale. Im surprised Yackee didnt pick up on that. Maybe he was too busy cashing his checks at an out of county bank

    -- Posted by canttakeitanymore on Wed, Jul 13, 2016, at 8:23 AM
  • Residents of Cloverdale please note the following:

    Banner Graphic published the Town Hall Meeting for May 10, 2016 on May 20, 2016 with the following:

    "The council approved Vice President Don Sublett's beginning talks with a realtor for the purchase of 1.18 acres for a pocket park in Cloverdale. The property was appraised at $45,000."

    On-line minutes for May 19, 2016 listed as "special meeting" states the following under Communications

    "Purchase property known as 900 S Cloverdale n1/2n/w s36t13 r4 with 1.18 acres EDIT Fund $40,000.00 which has been approved in the 2016 Budget leaving $101,599.74 in the EDIT.

    Don made the motion to approve the purchase for a park and Larry 2nd. Vote was unanimous.

    Any monies for the 2016 Budget are APPROVED in 2015, therefore, how can these minutes state that this money was approved for the 2016 Budget? Was this a secret line item when this budget was approved last year? EDIT Fund is NOT Grant money.

    -- Posted by cowgirl46135 on Wed, Jul 13, 2016, at 1:46 PM
  • Apparently the May 19 "special meeting" was not covered by the Banner.

    Did the Clerk Treasurer forget to notify them? Hmmmm.....

    -- Posted by captain crunch on Wed, Jul 13, 2016, at 2:12 PM
  • Sounds as if people are starting to wise up. I also read those same minutes earlier and thoughtnthe same thing. Does the word "TRANSPARENCY" mean anything. Someone or maybe the whole council needs to be held accountable.

    -- Posted by canttakeitanymore on Wed, Jul 13, 2016, at 2:26 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: