Accused killer has history of violence

Friday, February 7, 2020
John Gonzalez

Charged with the murder of a Greencastle woman last week, John Gonzalez already had a history of violent crimes in West Central Indiana.

The Terre Haute man was formally charged in Putnam Superior Court on Wednesday, not only with Melissa “Lisa” Attkisson’s murder, but with Level 6 felony auto theft and Level 6 felony theft of a firearm.

Gonzalez was located by Rock Island County, Ill., deputies on Monday, six days after Attkisson’s body was found.

The suspect was walking down the road near Attkisson’s stolen vehicle, which was wrecked in a field, and in possession of her identification, credit and debit cards.

Though not yet charged with murder at the time, Gonzalez was taken into custody on a warrant for probation violation out of Vigo County.

He was initially extradited to Vigo County for a hearing on a probation violation.

However, aware of the looming murder charge in Putnam County, the Vigo County judge canceled the Friday hearing and the suspect was turned over to Putnam County authorities.

He is now set to appear for an initial hearing before Superior Court Judge Denny Bridges at 2 p.m. on Monday.

If convicted on all three charges, Gonzalez could face as many as 70 years in prison — 65 years for murder and 2.5 each for the Level 6 felonies.

It would not be Gonzalez’s first term with the Indiana Department of Correction.

The 28-year-old has twice served time in Indiana prisons for felony convictions, spent time in the Vermillion County Jail for a felony that was pleaded down to a misdemeanor and still has a pending 2015 battery case in Vigo County.

The first of the two convictions resulted from a 2010 rape charge while Gonzalez was a student at Indiana State University.

According to a 2010 story in the Tribune-Star, Gonzalez was one of several students who helped a student to her dorm room after she had consumed alcohol. He later returned to her room and committed the crime.

DNA evidence linked Gonzalez to the crime, the paper noted.

A 2012 Tribune-Star story reported that Gonzalez had agreed to enter a guilty plea to Class D felony sexual battery and the Class B felony rape charge was dropped.

Gonzalez was sentenced to one year with the Indiana Department of Correction and two years of probation. He was also required to register as a sex offender.

Between time served in the Vigo County Jail and time credit for good behavior, Gonzalez was released from custody less than two months after his conviction.

In early 2012, with the rape case ongoing, Gonzalez was charged with Class D felony domestic battery in Vermillion County.

Through another plea agreement, the charge was reduced to a Class A misdemeanor and Gonzalez was sentenced to 315 days in the Vermillion County Jail with credit for time already served and the remainder to be spent on probation.

An internet court record search indicated that in November 2012, a notice of “unsatisfactory discharge from probation” was filed in the Vermillion County case.

Gonzalez’ next set of legal troubles came in 2015, when in a matter of nine days, he was charged with battery resulting in serious bodily injury in Vigo County and robbery in Fountain County.

In Fountain County, Gonzalez was charged with Level 5 felony robbery and Level 6 felony criminal confinement for a Sept. 2, 2015 incident at a Covington gas station.

Court records note that Gonzalez threatened the clerk with a knife before taking $260 from the cash register.

In December of that year, Gonzalez agreed to a guilty plea to the robbery charge with the criminal confinement charge dropped.

By agreement, he was sentenced to four years with the Indiana Department of Correction with credit for 108 days in jail.

Meanwhile, though, Gonzalez still had an ongoing case pending in Vigo Superior Court 6.

The alleged Vigo County crime, Level 5 felony battery resulting in serious bodily injury, actually took place on Aug. 25, 2015, nine days before the Covington robbery.

Gonzalez is accused of battering a man who considered him a friend, striking the victim multiple times in the head, fracturing his right orbital bone and a sinus cavity.

Both the victim and a woman who lived with him identified the suspect as Gonzalez.

While incarcerated at Putnamville Correctional Facility, Gonzalez made multiple court appearances in Terre Haute, even filing a May 20, 2016 request for a speedy trial.

However, the case was delayed multiple times, including a change of indigent counsel for Gonzalez as well as three separate motions by the prosecutor’s office to continue the case.

Jury trial dates had been set three times in the case — in February 2017, March 2019 and December 2109 — but each time, the court granted the state’s motion to continue due to congestion of the court calendar in Vigo County.

In the meantime, Gonzalez was released from Department of Correction custody on Sept. 3, 2019.

Upon release, Gonzalez stayed in contact with the court, even notifying authorities in November of a change of address — to Lisa Attkisson’s Greencastle address.

In a Jan. 8 hearing, his jury trial was again scheduled for June 22, 2020.

In the meantime, Gonzalez is now accused of a much more serious crime.

A family member found Attkission, 44, deceased in her home on Tuesday evening, Jan. 28. An autopsy the following day determined she had died of blunt force trauma.

Investigators noted that her vehicle and multiple items from her purse, including a handgun, were missing.

When police located Gonzalez near the wrecked vehicle, he was in possession of some of the items.

Investigators also determined that Gonzalez sold Attkisson’s cell phone at a Walmart store in Terre Haute. Investigators later recovered the phone as evidence.

Though court records do not indicate what became of Attkisson’s stolen handgun, a witness told police Gonzalez was in possession of a gun of similar description in Terre Haute on Jan. 29.

Comments
View 7 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • I thank the BG and Jared for the depth of background reporting in this.

    Now, dig a little deeper and tell us WHY and WHO let this guy out into the public to commit more of his twisted, senseless crimes.

    Also, was there any other connection to our town other than the murdered victim?

    -- Posted by direstraits on Sat, Feb 8, 2020, at 11:38 AM
  • There is no excuse for this person being on the street. This young woman would still be alive if the courts had of did their job. Disgraceful.

    -- Posted by decker_donna on Sat, Feb 8, 2020, at 11:54 AM
  • Vigo County Prosecutor should be ashamed.

    -- Posted by anotherPointer on Sat, Feb 8, 2020, at 1:07 PM
  • Here I go!! Oh here I go!! Lisa would still be alive today if our justice system did not fail once again!! Anyone can argue with me until your blue in the face but it is the truth! But they continued time and time again to plea him down, reduce his charges to lesser charges when he has proved over n over again he was a violent individual. Our justice system allowed him to walk amongst us in the streets. It was obvious his time reduced for “good behavior” was misconstrued! If he took classes for this while incarcerated then you better look at what it takes to pass these classes! How do you think his rape victim feels today? I’m sure she’s lived in fear since that day n looked over her shoulder everyday! She is probably looking at the news thinking this could have very easily been her. But wow our justice system reduced his charges for raping her! How do you think his next victim felt when he heard about Lisa’s death?? I’m sure he too thought this could have been him! Also looking over his shoulders and thanking the justice system for reducing the charges and having a “congested” court system that allowed him to get out of DOC to kill someone-Lisa- just a few months later!!Had he went to court instead of being released he could have still been incarcerated and Lisa would still be alive and Devan and Damon would not be burying their mom today! Now how much more in the face does that need to be! This man shows 3 different times before this that he is violent and you continue to reduce his charges, you continue to plea him out and you continue to give him unsatisfactory probation!! NOW LUSA IS DEAD BECAUSE OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM CHOICES!!! DOES THAT DOUND LIKE IM BEING HARSH?? You betcha!! Maybe that’s what you need in your face reality!!

    Like I said before you need to get a grip on these arrest warrants and quit letting them just sit there!! The individual that killed my son had one on him and he lived with a town Marshall who knew and he did nothing about it!

    So before you reduce some of the charges, plea him out or drop any of the charges you have against him and are going to file against him or give him credit for time spent in Vigo County or Putnam County jail (for those who don’t know 1 day in jail equals 2 days in prison) Lisa would still be alive! Talk to Lisa’s family and his other victims and let them know what you plan on doing!

    Signed one hot, ticked off justice system victims mom!

    -- Posted by tinamah08 on Sat, Feb 8, 2020, at 1:34 PM
  • If you know a person has such a violent past...please stay away from them. This is a story we hear too often. And I agree someone's head should roll letting him always plea down. Congested courts my ***! He should have still been behind bars.

    -- Posted by canttakeitanymore on Sun, Feb 9, 2020, at 7:36 PM
  • I would like to add my two cents' worth regarding this outrageous situation! I can't say much that has not already been said, and I must say that I am in total agreement with the others who have made comments so far. It is perfectly obvious that the "system" has a major problem in that plea bargaining and technicalities allow criminals to walk away from confinement only to repeat breaking the law. In this case (as in many others, I am sure) someone has been murdered. Mr. Gonzalez obviously has no fear of punishment for his crimes based on his past slaps on the wrist and releases. Is a defense attorney bound by law to offer a plea bargain option to a client? If that is the case, that might be one of the first holes we need to plug in this badly leaking dam of the justice system! My deepest sympathies to the family of the victim, and let's hope that the past 10 years of Mr. Gonzalez's record will have a strong bearing on the outcome of his conviction and punishment (Go for murder 1!!). Capital punishment's being used in such cases as this one would help to reduce the "congestion" of our prisons!

    -- Posted by vincenteunice46 on Mon, Feb 10, 2020, at 10:47 AM
  • *

    Vincenteunice46 -

    To answer your question re: plea offers...

    Such offers are made by the Prosecutors office, not defense attorneys.

    The Prosecutors office will look at many things including time/money for trial, possible outcomes, and even the victim's (or their family's) wishes. These are not exhaustive, but are some of the bigger factors.

    A defense attorney is bound by law to represent & defend the client to the best of their ability.

    Indiana does not separate their murder statutes in such ways (murder 1), and in order to get the death penalty you have to jump a very high hurdle.

    Is it applicable in this case? Probably, from my understanding of the law.

    But that is a determination that the Prosecutor's office will have to make, again based on many factors.

    Then you have to consider the judge, who has the authority to actually set the punishment, and more importantly has the authority to decide whether to render sentencing consecutively (each charge is added up for a total sentence...1+2+3=6) or concurrently (time served for the greater offense covers time served for the lesser offenses).

    I have seen nothing from Judge Bridges in the past that would cause me great concern.

    Barring the death penalty, that this man is never allowed to be in society again is probably the best we could hope for.

    However, given his age, its possible he will see freedom again...unfortunately.

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Tue, Feb 11, 2020, at 9:17 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: