DePauw chemistry prof wins research grant to collaborate with students

Tuesday, August 18, 2020

DePauw University students and their undergraduate and graduate peers at Colorado State University will study how water molecules behave in miniscule environments, thanks to National Science Foundation grants awarded to DePauw professor Bridget Gourley and her co-principal investigator.

Gourley, the Percy L. Julian professor of chemistry and biochemistry and dean of the DePauw faculty, and Nancy Levinger, a Colorado State chemistry professor with whom Gourley has previously collaborated, have won grants – $149,857 for DePauw and $382,279 for Colorado State – to conduct research with and train students.

The National Science Foundation is a U.S. government agency that supports fundamental research and education in the non-medical fields of science and engineering.

Bridget Gourley, the Percy L. Julian professor of chemistry and biochemistry at DePauw University

In each of the next three summers, Gourley will collaborate with two DePauw students who will receive stipends as they develop expertise at the molecular level and learn collaboration skills by working on an inter-institutional team of scientists at many career stages – undergraduate, graduate and post-doctoral.

The grant covers the cost of a month-long trip each summer to Colorado State, where DePauw students will work with an ultrafast laser.

The researchers will use magnetic and laser techniques to learn about the behavior of water when it is confined in structures measuring 40-billionths of an inch. Water behaves differently in such minuscule environments compared to, say, a drinking glass full of water, and other molecules that are often found in water in tight spaces also radically influence water’s properties.

The work will advance understanding of water’s behavior in environments that are important to processes such as chemical synthesis, environmental remediation and cellular activity.

In addition, several students who have signed up to conduct research during the school year to earn academic credit will begin working with Gourley on her project during the fall term.

“The system that we are choosing to study lends itself particularly well to having lots of different undergraduates,” Gourley said, “because it’s a system that each of them can become an expert in their own subsystem but that contributes in a very meaningful way to our overall understanding of the whole. …

“Students may be working on my project, with me on my science, but what I’m always really trying to be very conscious about is helping them to see how they’re developing skills that are broader than the particular project.”

Gourley and Levinger also will develop materials and train graduate students to mentor novice researchers, with the goal of nurturing the development of future researchers.

Comments
View 5 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • *

    There's an old axiom about what you get when you subsidize research... more research. (As compared to solutions.)

    I applaud this lady's goals, but I think she could do it without taxpayer money.

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Tue, Aug 18, 2020, at 12:24 PM
  • I may be old fashioned but, who cares how water performs at 40-billionths of an inch? I think it is pure nonsense. This prof has too much time on her hands.

    -- Posted by donantonio on Tue, Aug 18, 2020, at 2:41 PM
  • Research like this is how new things are invented. If you are a fan of advances in technology, medical equipment and treatments, transportation, food production, etc. then you need “pointless” research to build on to develop the end processes that allow those things.

    If you don’t care about any of those things, then yes, research is useless.

    -- Posted by techphcy on Tue, Aug 18, 2020, at 9:15 PM
  • I do enjoy advances in technology. So, tell me, techphcy, how does all your examples above benefit from knowing the properties of water that is only "40-billionths of an inch? Only an electron microscope would be needed to even see such an miniscule amount of water.

    -- Posted by donantonio on Wed, Aug 19, 2020, at 10:19 AM
  • I have no idea how this research might someday be used to improve our lives, and neither do you. I guess we should have dismissed the silicon semiconductor as unnecessary too, since we didn’t know how it would be used in the future.

    -- Posted by techphcy on Thu, Aug 20, 2020, at 1:12 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: