Fillmore residents worry it’s ‘us vs. them’

Monday, January 11, 2021

FILLMORE -- Even with no real new business to address with beginning 2021, it recently became suggestive that some Fillmore residents believe town leaders are not being transparent.

A few of them let their thoughts be known during the Fillmore Town Council’s regular meeting last Thursday evening. Though some exchanges were tense, the overarching concern became how to better involve the town as a whole.

Resident Stacy Vandiver first stated that there had been a “firestorm” on social media regarding recent actions taken by the council. Those include the town’s newly raised water rates and how the town could use money from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act.

The bigger issue behind it all, Vandiver said, was there being an “us vs. them” between residents and the council itself. With it being noted that not everyone in Fillmore has the Banner Graphic, the feeling has become that residents have been kept in the dark.

At one point, Vandiver became frustrated with the council for not giving what he considered specific details about these decisions. He also claimed that the town had not properly notified the community of such meetings.

Meanwhile, resident Doris Ratcliff shared a similar frustration to Vandiver’s with regard to the new water rates. The underlying issue here, though, was Fillmore purchasing its water from Greencastle.

Town Attorney Jeff Boggess responded that Vandiver was asking leading questions about the council responding during public comments. He added that the council was not obligated to do so, but was doing so to help.

As to Ratcliff’s complaint about the town’s new sewer rates, Boggess defended them in general, in that doing so meant that the town did not have to default on water loans.

Clerk-Treasurer Jayna Haldeman also responded that the problem with water bills was not that some residents cannot pay, but rather that they will not pay.

Vandiver suggested that the town consider something like a newsletter, which could be included in residents’ monthly bills. This, he suggested, could greatly improve communication between them and the council.

Toward the end of the meeting, former Council President Wes Terhune provided that the council was not solely to blame for Fillmore’s perceived stagnation.

Instead, he said, it was contingent on residents to take an interest in the town’s affairs. In essence, they should come to the monthly council meetings.

On another topic, Vandiver addressed the council about portable speed bumps being laid out on Hendricks Street. He has specifically inquired about setting them out himself during events at the Marvin’s Pass wedding venue.

Boggess said this was bringing a “novel question” about who could be liable for damages due to the speed bumps. However, both he and the council agreed that Vandiver would not assume this liability.

While Boggess said he would do more research on the liability, the council signaled being open to erecting a 15 mph sign to slow down traffic on Hendricks Street.

The speed limit for through traffic in the town is posted at 25 mph.

In other business:

• Council President Meredith Trusty accepted a nomination to continuing serving as such in 2021.

• The council publicly announced that Fillmore had been awarded its Community Crossings grant to repave Putnam Street from Main Street to Westwood Road. The 75-25 matching grant totals $130,953, with the town owing $43,651.

During the public comments, Haldeman said the town had allocated the money needed for the project. The repaving is tentatively set to get under way this coming spring.

With council members C.J. Huller and Jerry Huff joining Trusty, Utilities Operator Joe Cash also attended the meeting. Meanwhile, Town Marshal Darrel Bunten was not present.

The next regular meeting of the Fillmore Town Council is scheduled for Thursday, Feb. 4 at 7 p.m. in the Fillmore Town Hall.

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: