House passes Baird’s legislation to address surprise ambulance service bills

Monday, February 22, 2021
Beau Baird

INDIANAPOLIS – The Indiana House of Representatives voted unanimously in support of legislation authored by State Rep. Beau Baird (R-Greencastle) addressing surprise nonemergency ambulance bills.

Baird’s bill seeks to solve the issue of surprise billing. Specifically, it establishes a more reasonable reimbursement structure for providers while also collecting cost data to be used in the future to solve the greater surprise billing problem.

Baird authored this legislation after learning of a constituent who received a bill for almost $8,000 for an hour-long nonemergency ambulance ride from an out-of-network provider.

“This constituent had no say in what provider picked him up,” Baird said. “I don’t know of many industries where we’re forced to use a service without fully understanding the potential cost. Unlike a typical emergency situation, there is usually time to discuss options and explain costs for these nonemergency ambulance rides. Because ambulance rides often have a high price attached to them, everyone should have information up front if they’ll be responsible for such medical bills, especially if the bill will be more than anticipated.”

Baird’s constituent is not the only person who has experienced a surprise medical bill for ambulance service. Research by the journal Health Affairs found during a four-year period that almost three-fourths of all ambulance rides for members of a national insurance plan involved potential surprise bills at a median cost of $450 for ground transportation. By air, it was more than $20,000.

Visit iga.in.gov for more information on House Bill 1454. This legislation moves to the Indiana Senate for further consideration.

Comments
View 4 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • *

    Im curious... if it was a non-emergency why was the person taking an ambulance?

    I'm thinking an Uber would've cost him a less than $100.

    Even a cab would've been cheaper than $8000.

    There is something not very clear about all of this.

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Tue, Feb 23, 2021, at 4:15 PM
  • Dear dreadpirateroberts

    there are times if the patient is in a wheelchair and or bedridden that and is in need of going to a doctor appointment this might be the only way of getting them there.

    -- Posted by busymom48 on Thu, Feb 25, 2021, at 2:28 PM
  • *

    Busymom48 - thank you. That makes a bit of sense.

    There is still something "off" about all of this, but that would explain non-emergency ambulance rides over an hour away.

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Thu, Feb 25, 2021, at 3:41 PM
  • DPR - transfer from a hospital to a nursing home may also require an ambulance.

    -- Posted by unbiased on Thu, Feb 25, 2021, at 4:16 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: