Congressman Baird votes no on PRO union act

Wednesday, March 10, 2021
Jim Baird

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Fourth District Indiana Congressman Jim Baird (R-Greeencastle) voted no on H.R. 842, the PRO Act.

“This bill is a political giveaway to union bosses at the expense of American workers,” Congressman Baird said. “It would force workers into union contracts, bar workers’ right to vote by a secret ballot, and undermine Indiana’s own right-to-work laws.

“Furthermore,” Baird added, “this bill would hinder our economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic by stifling innovation and workers freedoms with its top-down, one-size fits all approach.”

The PRO Act is a radical bill that provides a political gift to union bosses that will result in diminished rights of workers and small businesses, the congressman said. He noted that it:

Overturns right-to-work laws in 27 states, including Indiana, forcing workers to give up their hard-earned dollars to labor unions, regardless if they want to be represented by a union.

Would make workers susceptible to harassment, intimidation, and deceit from union organizers by requiring employers to hand over workers’ private, personal information to union organizers, including home addresses, cellphone and landline numbers, personal email addresses.

Denies employers due process rights by prohibiting them from being heard before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on matters pertaining to union representation. Only unions will be allowed to speak before the NLRB in these instances.

Restricts flexibility and freedom of workers who want the ability to set their own hours and harm the gig-economy by codifying the California’s “ABC” test that would set a national standard whether or not a worker is an employee or independent contractor.
Comments
View 7 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Thank you and well done!!!! I know it is hands out season but, at some point, even leftist/ liberals know there has to be a limit.

    You would think the recent "non COVID relief" bill filled with many unique items including the beginning of gtd income would be enough.

    -- Posted by beg on Wed, Mar 10, 2021, at 3:01 PM
  • My dad was a proud UAW member his whole career. Many companies want people to work for as little as possible and many hours as they can get away with. Sometimes in unsafe conditions. The union is there to protect the workers from greedy business owners.

    The union dues are for hiring union reps and attorneys, staff, office, etc. That's what the dues are for. Unions are the good guys.

    -- Posted by Raker on Wed, Mar 10, 2021, at 7:41 PM
  • Unfortunately, this bill passed the House of Representatives on March 9, 2021. If you have an interest in this legislation, please contact your senators to express your views.

    -- Posted by rawinger on Thu, Mar 11, 2021, at 6:53 AM
  • No point in contacting our Indiana senators, they will vote how Mitch tells them to.

    -- Posted by Geologist on Thu, Mar 11, 2021, at 8:55 AM
  • Indiana Department of Corrections used to have Union protection to keep management from firing without adequate reason, along with discriminating against people with health issues. That skinny little weasel, Mitch Daniels, put an end to that.

    -- Posted by Queen53 on Thu, Mar 11, 2021, at 10:30 AM
  • I wonder how many commenters have ever been members of a union. I've been a member of two; one of which was so corrupt and out of touch with its members that it was voted out. The second was better but not by much. It wasn't so corrupt but was so busy trying to elect liberals into power that it honestly forget its primary responsibility to its members. As an example, the union officials worked banker's hours, which meant they were rarely accessible to second and third shift.

    I've always considered myself a strong union supporter, but my experience has been kind of hit and miss.

    However, where many unions do shine is in the movies and history books concerning their connections to organized crime. It can make an otherwise boring movie interesting! Especially when it comes to the history of the UAW.

    -- Posted by Prince of Stardust Hills on Thu, Mar 11, 2021, at 12:59 PM
  • A very divisive issue. It is not cut and dried. I can come with examples that both support pro union and anti union positions.

    I also note that some of the commentators once again revert to name calling rather than having confidence in their perspective. We can do better than that. I think so anyway. I would encourage letting your personal perspective stand on its merits.

    -- Posted by beg on Thu, Mar 11, 2021, at 6:13 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: