Baird leads 55 colleagues in bipartisan effort to protect farmers’ access to crop protection tools

Friday, June 10, 2022
Jim Baird

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Indiana District 4 Congressman Jim Baird (R-Greencastle), along with Chairman Sanford Bishop (GA-02), and 54 of their colleagues sent a bipartisan letter to President Biden to protect farmers’ access to critical crop protection tools.

“At a time when American farmers and ranchers are faced with record input costs and shortages of critical inputs, the U.S. solicitor general’s amicus brief could threaten our producers’ ability to feed and fuel the world,” Congressman Baird said.

“As our country continues to face the highest inflation rates in decades,” Baird said, “it’s critical that our government provide certainty to the agriculture industry and the broader American food supply chain. My colleagues and I are deeply concerned that this flawed opinion will undermine growers’ long-term access to innovation and increase costs, which is why we sent a letter to President Biden asking for his immediate withdrawal of Solicitor General Prelogar’s brief.”

On May 10, the U.S. solicitor general submitted an amicus brief weighing in on a class action lawsuit against Bayer, which would allow the state of California to require a cancer warning label for the widely utilized herbicide glyphosate, in a departure from decades of scientific consensus from academia and regulatory bodies across the world that say the herbicide is not a carcinogen.

Not only does the solicitor general’s brief reverse a long-held view on federal preemption, but it sets a dangerous precedent for the United States’ science- and risk-based regulatory system, Baird said. This brief, if acted upon, would up-end the entire regulatory process for crop protection tools and all forms of agricultural innovation, creating uncertainty and undermining confidence in scientific integrity.

This letter calls attention to the impact of glyphosate and its importance to U.S. farmers, addresses food security concerns and the implications of taking important crop protection tools away from producers. This bipartisan letter is supported by dozens of agricultural industry stakeholders and producer groups, including the American Farm Bureau Federation, American Soybean Association, National Cotton Council and many others.

Comments
View 1 comment
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • *

    Guess he will just overlook the study that came out recently showing that glyphosate actually does indirectly affect bee colonies and puts them at risk.

    It is a bad chemical and should not be used at all.

    Of course, Mr Baird continues his "government solutions" tour with such hits as planned economies and government over-reach..."critical that our government provide certainty to the agriculture industry and the broader American food supply chain.

    Big Agribusiness sure does have good friends.

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Mon, Jun 13, 2022, at 7:41 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: