Non-support charges filed against 39 parents totaling nearly half-million dollars

Thursday, February 20, 2014

The Putnam County Prosecutor's Office has charged 39 individuals with criminal non-support of children, it was announced Thursday.

The 39 individuals are alleged to be collectively $494,461.39 in arrears in child support.

"Charges have been filed on these 39," Putnam County Prosecutor Timothy Bookwalter advised. "I have asked the courts to find probable cause for their arrests and warrants have been issued."

Three defendants among the 39 charged have racked up more than $30,000 in delinquent child support payments. Heading the list is Gregory Sanders at $36,189, followed by Steven Hornback at $35,240 and Allen Broughton at $34,177.

Parents in arrears in child support can be charged with a Class C felony, punishable by up to eight years in prison, if they owe more than $15,000 in back support.

Those who owe less than $15,000 are subject to a Class D felony charge, which carries a maximum sentence of three years in jail.

It should always be remembered that charges are mere allegations and must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, the prosecutor added.

However, the 39 cases filed apparently represent just the tip of the child-support iceberg locally.

The Prosecutor's Office has 1,399 active delinquent child-support cases, Bookwalter told the Banner Graphic, explaining that those resulting in criminal charges being filed have been considered the most egregious.

Filing such charges, the prosecutor said, "means by this time we've gone through all the other options like civil proceedings and contempts (of court) and sending letters. This is sort of the last gasp."

Meanwhile, the intent of the filing process remains quite simple.

"The general goal is to get people to pay their child support," Book-walter acknowledged. "When we do this, it seems to affect everybody (owing child support), and overall people start doing a better job of paying their child support."

The process has been effective for the Putnam County Prosecutor's Office in the recent past.

"When they see this in the paper, they usually come in and want to settle up," Bookwalter said.

Charges have been filed against the following individuals:

-- Mark Albright, owing $16,883.64.

-- Kris Austin, owing $21,224.42.

-- Brian Bartley, owing $24,222.

-- Cody Bell, owing $3,453.66.

-- Keith Bodnarick, owing $15,480.54.

-- Danny Branam, owing $26,801.

-- Allen Braughton, owing $34,177.54.

-- Theodore Braun, owing $1,360.97.

-- Thomas Childers, owing $8,643.07.

-- Keith Clampitt, owing $3,640.

-- John Crane, owing $5,237.

-- Darien Davis, owing $4,370.87.

-- Willie Duncan, owing $21,420.

-- Matthew Eversole, owing $15,555.36.

-- Chris Gainor, owing $15,423.

-- James Greenier, owing $5,557.36

-- Joshua Harbruegar, owing $4,707.65

-- Steven Hornback, owing $35,240.

-- Derrick Johnson, owing $7,296.

-- Christopher Kwiek, owing $6,675.

-- James Lewis, owing $15,199.35.

-- Sean McClamroch, owing $12,159.01.

-- Damon Miller, owing $26,011.66.

-- Delton Moore, owing $3,419.

-- Chadwick Mullins, owing $1,463.87.

-- Joseph Nieder, owing $10,608.39.

-- William Padgett, owing $15,008.87.

-- Jillian Ray, owing $4,824.

-- Gregory Sanders, owing $36,189.95.

-- Donald Schmidt, owing $16,154.71.

-- Dexter Scott, owing $3,357.46.

-- Jeffrey Skinner, owing $26,826.92.

-- Eric Stewart, owing $1,889.09.

-- George Tekle, owing $1,456.76.

-- Kristopher Tipton, owing $1,396.10.

-- Robert Tobin, owing $7,293.

-- Troy Truax, owing $3,398.17.

-- J. Ames Webb, owing $26,863.

-- Jerome Zeller, owing $4,573.

Comments
View 7 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Teachers to convicted drug dealers. Poor kids...

    -- Posted by jorge on Fri, Feb 21, 2014, at 12:55 AM
  • I don't understand why it takes the court to make them pay up, when they are the ones to help bring the poor kids into this world and they don't want to PAY for their own kids. On top of the support now they have court cost. The kids are the ones to suffer.

    -- Posted by kcarnes on Fri, Feb 21, 2014, at 7:51 AM
  • I pay my support. BUT when there is none of that money going to benefit my child, there is no accountability for the use of the funds and she use it to smoke or drink, i have an issue. fyi, the ex lives with her parents in a house that is paid for, and she bounces from job to job and man to man, but i still have to pay for her to get high.... the system is seriously flawed. now here's the kicker... 2 years ago i was unemployed for about 8 months. it took almost 2 months to get my first check. i and in the meantime i was expected to pay support or go to jail. the big problem is that i DID pay them, and when i got my first check, they still took the money out for each week. i was told that the overpayment could not be returned and i would not receive credit for it, it was considered a gift. nice system we have...

    -- Posted by Sickofthesystem on Fri, Feb 21, 2014, at 12:38 PM
  • Jorge--what in the world are talking about? Is your English limited or you just don't how to type?

    -- Posted by donantonioelsabio on Fri, Feb 21, 2014, at 12:51 PM
  • oops they forgot one who hasn't paid in 26 years And now will not go after him because children are of age. and it is back support so now if I want any of the 35,000 have to hire an attorney. Why do they wait so long they know these people will not ever be able to pay so they arrest they spend 30 days in jail and it starts all over. These people know the system oh I get a letter I'll pay something I am good for another 6 months.

    -- Posted by somethingnew on Sat, Feb 22, 2014, at 6:38 AM
  • i have to agree with Sickofthesytem....i also pay support to the other parent and he uses it to buy his wife pills. he constantly tells my daughter that i don't pay, she is 16 now and i show her my paycheck stubs that shows where they are taking a total of 4 weeks worth of payments out in every check...he wasn't even living in the same house as my daughter for a period of 6 months and now he is living with his mother, free of charge with his wife and my daughter!!! I have no problem helping with my daughter, if it is for her, BUT she gets none of it!! all she gets is her father dirty mouthing me AND a happy pill-head stepmother.

    -- Posted by slhamm728 on Tue, Feb 25, 2014, at 3:57 PM
  • "This is sort of the last gasp." ??? HUH? Gasp or GRASP? Someone having trouble breathing?

    As a former single parent, my "donor" was over $30k behind, but because he lived in another state (CA), I would have to pay $3500 (then) to retain a lawyer to go after him. I told CSE if I had $3500, I wouldn't need child support!

    My son is now 26 and yes, eventually I received all of the back pay .. in $50 increments, mind you .. so I can relate to the custodial parents who have to "make it work".

    Back then, I worked for $5.75/hour and had to have my dad help me buy propane to heat the house because I didn't make enough (even with WIC) to pay $200 out of pocket up front (they wouldn't allow payments), but I managed. I kept the insurance HE was supposed to keep on my son, and made sure my son had everything he needed to survive.

    The system is BROKE on both sides. There are custodials who are using their support for partying, while others are barely making it with support. There are non-custodials who aren't deadbeats, but get lumped in with those who are.

    The only way to combat this broken system is with MORE CSE caseworkers and stiffer penalties, like JAILTIME.

    "I can't pay my support if I'm in jail ..", well, YOU AREN'T PAYING IT ANYWAY, so at least get some punishment for VIOLATING A COURT ORDER, how about?

    -- Posted by Emmes on Wed, Feb 26, 2014, at 10:59 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: