No room for park house renovation in 2023 budget

Thursday, August 18, 2022
The house at the entrance of Robe-Ann Park, which has for decades served as the home of the park director, is likely to be demolished after city officials chose not to fund needed improvements to the structure.
Banner Graphic/ERIC BERNSEE

For more than two hours earlier this week, the Greencastle City Council studied the proposed 2023 city budget.

The Council doubled funding for road repairs in 2023, endorsed five percent across-the-board raises for fulltime city employees and suggested putting more money in the pool repair budget.

What it did not do was provide any funding in the 2023 budget for the renovation/repair of the park house at the Bloomington Street entrance to Robe-Ann Park.

The elephant in the room during the budget review, the park house was discussed several times but in the end no money was allocated for what has been estimated as at least a $142,000 major renovation.

Consequently, the likely alternative is demolition and the end of a decades-old tradition of housing the park superintendent in the 2,100-square-foot home at 405 Bloomington St.

“Does a decision on the house need to be made tonight or do we continue to let it dangle?” Councilman Darrel Thomas asked.

While no such vote was deemed necessary, Councilman Dave Murray asked for a straw poll, asking if there was anyone on the Council who did not think putting $142,000 or more into the renovation was a bad idea.

Stacie Langdon raised her hand.

“We haven’t put any money into it for years,” the Council liaison to the Park Board noted. “We hear it’s structurally sound. I keep asking what it’s worth. If we can find $150,000 to $160,000 in the budget somewhere and don’t have to finance it, that would be great.”

But that would also be impossible according to the financial picture laid out by City Clerk-Treasurer Lynda Dunbar who said the park budget is $133,000 in the hole this year compounded by the reduction to a five-day week at the city pool and could be looking at a $201,000 deficit in 2023. The Indiana Department of Local Government Finance (DLGF) would not approve that park budget if submitted, she said.

The city clerk noted that although the low bid for the renovation work was $142,000 from Energy Conservation Solutions (ECS), contractor Bill Mentgen of ECS indicated renovation work would likely uncover other issues. Thus Dunbar used the figure $175,000 for the work to be done.

“It’s a lot of money,” she said, adding that there are too many what-ifs involved as well. “There are so many other better things we could spend $175,000 on.”

Councilman Cody Eckert said he agreed with Park Board member Pete Meyer’s idea of demolishing the house and creating a new park entrance.

“I’m disinclined to spend the money to repair the house,” Eckert said.

“I’m with you,” Murray replied, “tear the son of a gun down and quit throwing good money after bad.”

“I’m fine with letting it go,” Councilor Veronica Pejril said.

Neither Council President Mark Hammer or Councilor Adam Cohen was in attendance, but Langdon indicated neither was in favor of spending money for the renovation.

While the Council was technically in agreement not to fund the park house renovation, no official vote was taken. That will come as part of the budget approval process when the Council considers the 2023 budget at forthcoming meetings with first reading expected Sept. 8.

Meanwhile, Dunbar said Park Director Greg Ruark’s annual salary will be increased by “plus or minus $12,000” to reflect the compensation of the park house and utilities he was promised upon his hiring in March. Ruark has yet to live in the park house and will receive back pay for the period he has been park director.

Another uncertainty in the park budget is the possibility of a pool filtering system repair that could cost $120,000 or more. The city is waiting on a recommendation from Spear Corp. about the issue.

If the system goes down during the pool season, it would require a shutdown for repair work, followed by refilling the pool and waiting on testing of the water before reopening. That could result in an untimely two- or three-week closure.

Meanwhile, Dunbar noted that the city budgeted $415,000 to spend on streets in 2022. She recommended doubling that to $830,000 next year.

“We have not worked on any side streets,” the clerk-treasurer added.

“It’s time,” Pejril responded.

Looking at salaries, Dunbar said going to five percent increases would mean there won’t be anybody working fulltime for the City of Greencastle making less than $20 an hour.

Dunbar also said she will look into the scenario of providing $1,000 employee bonuses at the end of the year if the budget warrants that expenditure.

Comments
View 12 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • I have a pet peeve -- if the members of the council can't make the meetings then bow out and lets get someone who will.

    -- Posted by Alfred E. on Fri, Aug 19, 2022, at 8:03 AM
  • Is it really fair to say a house has 2100 sq. feet when a lot of the second floor you can't even stand up staight without hitting your head? Bad design! Tear it down for that reason alone!

    -- Posted by Raker on Fri, Aug 19, 2022, at 8:17 AM
  • I have no problems taking it down, my only question is...why didn't the previous park manager take care of it? If something broke / wore out was it never fixed? Was it ever asked to be fixed? Why was it just let go for so long?

    -- Posted by myjaylantt on Fri, Aug 19, 2022, at 1:01 PM
  • @myjaylantt. The park house is not in disrepair. It only needs cosmetic updates. The last time Greencastle hired a park director was in the 90s? Maybe 2000? Since that time the repairs have been made when needed, but no updates.

    Look back through the park board minutes. The city has owns the home. Each time a repair was needed, the director would bring it to the park board for approval. The past director was a good steward of the park house.

    -- Posted by bevaallmanmiller on Sat, Aug 20, 2022, at 6:43 AM
  • Is there not a way to do some kind of fund raising to meet the needs requested? Just a thought.

    -- Posted by driventoserve2020 on Sat, Aug 20, 2022, at 12:08 PM
  • There's a certain irony that the decision to raze the park house is taking place soon after the razing of a house on DePauw campus. I didn't catch how old the park house is, but there seems be some architectural significance. It has "curb appeal."

    On the other hand, i can appreciate the difficult position of the city leadership. It's not like we have a tax base that allows for saving building for which there is no other purpose. It begs the question, though, that if it would take "at least a $142,000 maajor renovation," do we really think we can raze and construct another entrance to the park for less than that?

    -- Posted by kellnp on Sat, Aug 20, 2022, at 2:48 PM
  • Imagine having a home provided as part of your compensation for employment. Only to not receive it and be compensated substantially less annually than what it would take to afford something similar in this town.

    -- Posted by rockstartinting on Sun, Aug 21, 2022, at 9:57 PM
  • The park board needed to check that house at least twice a year inside- then you would not have the mess you have now

    -- Posted by small town fan on Mon, Aug 22, 2022, at 10:17 AM
  • I agree with rockstartinting. The fact that they are now only going to compensate $12000 a year, when mortgages and rent are substantially higher than $1000/month for a comparable house in good shape in Greencastle. Don't be surprised when we lose the Park Director over this.

    -- Posted by Javabeans on Mon, Aug 22, 2022, at 10:35 AM
  • The problem is that they can't afford it. It's just not something that should be a priority when park budget is already in the negative, and the pool filter needs fixed. That's all there is to it. The house turned out to be an ancient money pit, just like the one at Depauw!

    -- Posted by Raker on Mon, Aug 22, 2022, at 11:21 AM
  • It’s a sad situation. Another house bites the dust. Too bad the house wasn’t taken care of before now.

    -- Posted by pjr1974 on Mon, Aug 22, 2022, at 9:55 PM
  • A lot of things get neglected or not fully funded with government, but it's mainly because there's not enough tax revenue, which creates limited resources and then always having to prioritize what's more important. If you want everything maintained and funded properly, then you have to support the fact that the average person's taxes will need to go to up cover it, possibly 7-10% or so. That's a number I found before when comparing average U.S. tax rates with other places in the world that are known for having well-funded government programs.

    Of course, Republicans will never let that happen, and if it did they would probably start the Tea Party 2.0 and right wing militias would be storming government buildings acting like it's the Alamo or something.

    -- Posted by Raker on Tue, Aug 23, 2022, at 8:07 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: