Redistricting to make 1st Ward largest in city

Monday, October 24, 2022
Proposed city redistricting map

After seven different proposals, the City of Greencastle appears to have a new redistricting map.

With a deadline for equalizing the voting populations in the city’s four wards coming and implementation due after the 2023 election, volunteer efforts by local activist Kelsey Kauffman and her son, Aden Stinebrickner-Kauffman, have given Greencastle a new map.

The City Council is expected to take action on the redistricting effort at its November meeting (Thursday, Nov. 10 at City Hall) after briefly discussing the issue at the October Council session.

Discussion of the matter began in earnest at the May meeting when the Council looked at proposals from several law firms willing to tackle the process for $35,000-$40,000.

However, it was Kauffman who has been involved in state redistricting issues along with a group of DePauw University students helping lead the charge to make city voting districts as close to equality as possible.

Redistricting “has been a major part of my life for the past 11 years,” Kauffman told the Council in May, suggesting there was no need to hire an outside firm to do the redistricting in a community this size.

The proposed redistricting map selection has resulted in a complete turn-around for First Ward, represented on the Council by Adam Cohen. It is presently the smallest of the four wards. Under the proposed change, with a population of 2,478, First Ward would represent the largest voting contingent.

The changes would also put 2,442 in the Second Ward (represented by Stacie Langdon), 2,440 in Third Ward (represented by Veronica Pejril) and 2,460 in Fourth Ward (represented by Cody Eckert).

“Ironically,” Council President Mark Hammer, one of the three at-large members, said, “First Ward, which was our smallest, is now our largest by just a few people.”

The proposed map also “maintains the integrity of the current districts,” he added.

“This one just rose to the top (among the seven map considerations),” Hammer said, because of the consistent population via wards.

As redrawn, First Ward is essentially the west side of Greencastle, from the viaduct on the north side to Veterans Memorial Highway on the south and west of Locust Street.

Second Ward, as redrawn, is essentially everything north of Washington Street and east of Northwood Boulevard/Greenwood Drive to the city limits on the east.

Third Ward is essentially redrawn as south of Washington Street to Tennessee Street north of Foxridge, east of Locust Street, including the entire East Side to the city limits.

Fourth Ward is redrawn as all of Foxridge plus a few areas north of Veterans Highway and south to city limits, as far west as the west side of Locust Street and east to 10th Street.

More specifics on the actual street layouts is expected to be available at the November City Council meeting.

The volunteer effort of Kauffman and her son “saved us a lot of money and did it without any political infighting,” Councilman Cohen praised.

The next question is whether the city wishes to remain with a seven-member Council or steps back to a five-member board now that the latest Census has put Greencastle’s population back at fewer than 10,000 residents.

City Attorney Laurie Hardwick said she will prepare an ordinance both ways and the Council can vote on having five or seven members. Dropping back to five could pit Hammer against Dave Murray and Darrel Thomas as the lone at-large candidate should the three run again in the next election.

Going back to five, Hammer pointed out, could save the city $170,000 over the course of 10 years.

“I like the idea of seven voices,” Councilor Langdon said.

Murray agreed. Keeping it at seven, he said, offers “a diversity of thought.”

In other business, the Council:

-- Unanimously passed on first reading Ordinance 2022-10 which limits parking on Franklin Street to just the south side of the street between College Avenue and Indianapolis Road. Adoption of the ordinance on second reading is expected at the Council’s Nov. 10 meeting.

-- Passed on first reading Ordinance 2022-11 which cleans up some discrepancies in the parking ordinance and deletes the 10-minute spot in the Walnut Street lot that was provided for pandemic-time food pickup for nearby restaurants and Breadworks.

-- Approved Ordinance 2022-13 on first reading, eliminating five previously reserved spots for First Christian Church in the Walnut Street lot that had been reserved since the lot was acquired by the city from the church.

-- Approved Ordinance 2022-14 on first reading, adding a handicapped space on the south side of the city parking lot north of the Banner Graphic building. There had been no previous handicapped spot in that city lot.

-- Adopted Ordinance 2022-6 on second reading, setting a 2023 city budget of $29,417,568 with $4,158,710 coming via the adopted tax levy at an adopted rate of $1.6723 per $100 of assessed value.

Comments
View 13 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • interesting

    -- Posted by beg on Tue, Oct 25, 2022, at 8:22 AM
  • https://www.cityofgreencastle.com/officials/elected-officials/common-council

    This is a link to our current district map. Did the designations of 1st North, and

    1st South only relate to polling places, before we had central voting locations?

    -- Posted by bevaallmanmiller on Tue, Oct 25, 2022, at 5:43 PM
  • Shouldn't redistricting be a bipartisan task?

    -- Posted by Homegrown765 on Tue, Oct 25, 2022, at 6:16 PM
  • I was thinking the same thing about bipartisanship. Wouldn't it be better to pay an outside source to redraw the districts?

    -- Posted by jake71 on Tue, Oct 25, 2022, at 9:09 PM
  • How would one select the outside source?

    -- Posted by Koios on Tue, Oct 25, 2022, at 9:53 PM
  • Shouldn’t redistricting be done by an impartial third party? Just a thought…

    -- Posted by paulaobrien10 on Wed, Oct 26, 2022, at 8:27 PM
  • Yes, it should be. But the 2 parties currently resist that feverishly. Which creates the current condition, unfortunately.

    -- Posted by Koios on Wed, Oct 26, 2022, at 9:02 PM
  • The Indiana Democratic party platform calls for an independent commission to handle redistricting, because they are serious about putting an end to gerrymandering.

    -- Posted by Raker on Wed, Oct 26, 2022, at 9:22 PM
  • The democrats are “serious about putting an end to gerrymandering” in Indiana right now because they have no power to gerrymander the maps.

    One look at the Maryland map will tell you just how “serious” the party is as a whole.

    Voting districts should be redrawn by AI programmed to create the most uniform possible districts in each region.

    -- Posted by techphcy on Thu, Oct 27, 2022, at 6:00 AM
  • they are serious about ending gerrymandering they don't like.

    -- Posted by beg on Thu, Oct 27, 2022, at 9:16 AM
  • Every state should have a bipartisan redistricting committee, they could easily make a software program where you punch in the data and it produces a map or maps that the committee can vote on. I did take a look at Maryland, they're only one of 17 states where Dems have a majority. I don't blame them for not unilaterally disadvantaging themselves, considering republicans don't care one bit about equal representation, and gerrymander every chance they get. Especially these days republicans have become openly fascist and want dictators to take over.

    The Maryland governor (a republican) created a bipartisan citizen commission to draw maps that then were rejected by the state assembly, which is majority democrats. We don't know what those maps looked like, but my opinion is that a nine member panel of 3 Dems, 3 GOP, and 3 Independents isn't bipartisan. The whole reason you'd have a bipartisan panel is to act as a referee on each other, and I think that Independent registered voters tend to lean one way or the other and just want to hide their affiliation or don't want to commit to a certain party. So I think that might ruin the impartial-ness of it.

    The John Lewis Voting Rights Act, Freedom to Vote Act and For the People Act, all bills created by Democrats, all of them included making gerrymandering illegal nationwide, but guess what? They all failed on a party line vote in the senate, unanimously opposed by republicans.

    -- Posted by Raker on Thu, Oct 27, 2022, at 10:20 AM
  • Thank you

    -- Posted by beg on Fri, Oct 28, 2022, at 11:06 AM
  • Beg that's alright, keep choosing the dark side and making Jesus cry

    -- Posted by Raker on Sat, Oct 29, 2022, at 12:16 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: