City Economic Development Commission reactivated with housing project pending

Thursday, February 2, 2023
Mayor Bill Dory (right) administers the oath of office to the new members of the reactivated Greencastle Economic Development Commission (from left) Brian Cox, Mark Hammer, Ken Eitel and Laura Monnett. The fifth member of the commission is Tosh Everson, who was unable to attend the inaugural session at City Hall.
BannerGraphic/ERIC BERNSEE

When last the Greencastle Economic Development Commission (EDC) convened, the iPhone had yet to make its calling, young people were about to be consumed by MySpace and Peyton Manning had yet to lead the Indianapolis Colts to their first Super Bowl.

Monday evening Mayor Bill Dory got the reconstituted EDC together at City Hall after the city was contacted by developers interested in using industrial revenue bonds and/or tax abatement to finance a new housing project.

“It could be 30 or 40 years since this board met,” Dory told new members Mark Hammer, Ken Eitel, Brian Cox and Laura Monnett. A fifth member, Tosh Everson, was unable to attend.

Dory went on to explain that the EDC --- not to be confused with the Greencastle Redevelopment Commission (RDC) or the Citizens Advisory Commission for Industrial Development (CACFID) -- is “one of those boards we call together as needed.”

Upon further review, it turns out the EDC likely met in 2002 -- still more than 20 years ago when Nancy Michael was mayor -- as Pedcor Investments was refinancing its Round Barn Manor apartment project. City Attorney Laurie Hardwick was able to find a November 2002 document about that issue.

Getting to the nitty-gritty, Mayor Dory said the reason he asked everyone to serve is that the city has had a request come in asking for tax abatement on a residential project.

Indiana statute allows for the creation of an Economic Development Target Area to provide local property tax abatement for non-industrial projects such as commercial and rental housing projects. The process is similar to the traditional tax abatement process but requires an extra step. Before the City Council can take action, the Economic Development Commission must make a favorable recommendation based on certain criteria.

The criteria include that the target area has become undesirable or impossible for economic development because of a lack of development, cessation of growth, deterioration of improvements or character of occupancy, age, obsolescence, substandard buildings or other factors that have impaired values or prevent normal development or use of the property.

The fiscal body of a city may designate a maximum of 15 percent of the total geographic territory of the municipality. The area of Greencastle is approximately 5.26 square miles or 3,366 acres. The statute would thus limit the total area of the city that could be designated as approximately 504 acres.

Dory noted that “up until recently interest rates have been so favorable that people have just gone with conventional financing.”

Greencastle does have a housing shortage, the mayor said, “based on several studies.”

Hammer, who also serves as City Council president, agreed.

“There is a need,” he said. ”It’d be nice if a builder here wanted to build single-family dwellings, add to the tax base, get the children in the school corporation and all.”

The city has never done tax abatement with housing, the mayor noted.

“We do have a request that’s come in from a developer for a specific project,” Dory added, noting that the developer has not yet submitted an official application.

“Once we open the door,” the mayor continued, “there could be some additional interest and some other projects come in.”

The EDC did elect officers as its first official action. On a motion by Cox, Hammer was elected president with Eitel as vice president and Monnett as secretary.

The terms of the five board members are staggered with Monnett and Everson serving three-year terms appointed by the mayor, Hammer a two-year term appointed by the City Council, Eitel a one-year term appointed by the County Council and Cox a one-year term appointed by the mayor.

No new meeting date was set for the commission.

Comments
View 5 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Everyone property tax continues to climb, therefore I am completely opposed to any tax abatement.

    -- Posted by Alfred E. on Fri, Feb 3, 2023, at 10:46 AM
  • Now Now! The SSLCL will very upset with such a position. We all can give more to the cause!

    -- Posted by beg on Fri, Feb 3, 2023, at 12:05 PM
  • You do understand that abatements only apply to new buildings, jobs or equipment, righ? They still have to pay taxes on everything they already have. They do have the option of going somewhere else and closing the doors altogether if they don't get abatement on the new stuff here. Then we have yet another empty building producing little orno revenue.

    -- Posted by Geologist on Fri, Feb 3, 2023, at 4:24 PM
  • *

    Abatements are a race to the bottom for cities and towns. When other communities incentivize for builders, our community suffers for not doing the same, and we're left with little choice but to get on board or be left behind. Greencastle badly needs more affordable housing, and if abatements are what it takes to attract builders, I'm all for it.

    In the long run, the tax revenues from new construction will lower the tax base for all. Short term pain, long term gain.

    -- Posted by Bunny1E on Sat, Feb 4, 2023, at 12:16 PM
  • Well said

    -- Posted by beg on Sun, Feb 5, 2023, at 6:43 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: