DePauw earns ‘green light’ free speech rating

Thursday, May 18, 2023

After revising six policies, DePauw University has earned the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) “green light” rating, the highest possible rating for policies that regulate student speech on campus.

DePauw’s new rating represents one of the most successful turnarounds in the history of FIRE’s “Spotlight” rating system. Only a few years ago, DePauw was a “red light” school and came in last in FIRE’s 2021 College Free Speech Rankings.

“For more than a year and half, FIRE and DePauw have worked together to revamp their policies to ensure students can freely engage in expression on campus and add their voices to the conversation,” FIRE Senior Program Officer Mary Griffin said. “DePauw should be commended for its commitment to free and open inquiry. We hope more colleges will follow its lead.”

An overall green light rating is reserved for schools with no policies that seriously restrict or chill speech, and it places DePauw in an elite class. FIRE’s most recent “Spotlight on Speech Codes” report found that of the 486 schools included in the Spotlight database, only 60, or 12 percent, earned a green light rating.

The new rating also cites DePauw as one of the best schools in the state of Indiana for free speech.

DePauw earned its new rating after working with FIRE to update its policies on harassment, bias, campus posting, prohibited student conduct, and electronic communications, removing vague or unclear language that left students open to punishment over expression that would be protected by the private school’s strong free speech promises.

In 2022, DePauw also adopted the “Statement of DePauw Values on Freedom of Expression,” which articulates that “all members of the DePauw community have a duty to support free expression at the university, to refrain from actions that reduce intellectual exchange and to guarantee the rights of others to question, defend, and express a wide variety of beliefs and ideas.” The statement is modeled on the “Chicago Statement,” the gold standard for institutional policy statements on freedom of expression that has been endorsed by nearly 100 institutions nationwide.

“At a time when our neighborhoods, social circles, and information channels are increasingly segregated, the pursuit of conversation across differences has never been more important,” DePauw University President Lori S. White said. “College campuses, particularly those that are residential, are one of the few places where people are invited to live, learn, work, and develop community together across a range of differences. Liberal arts colleges are communities actively grappling with the interconnectedness of diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging and free expression.

“By leaning into and openly discussing through teaching, scholarship and campus conversation the complexities of our histories, identities, and ideologies we fortify our mission to educate leaders the world needs. We are appreciative of FIRE’s recognition of DePauw’s continued work on free expression.”

The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending and sustaining the individual rights of all Americans to free speech and free thought. FIRE recognizes that colleges and universities play a vital role in preserving free thought within a free society. To this end, it places a special emphasis on defending the individual rights of students and faculty members on our nation’s campuses, including freedom of speech, freedom of association, due process, legal equality, religious liberty and sanctity of conscience.

Comments
View 11 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • The whole FIRE "free speech rating" for colleges thing is meaningless nonsense to everyone except for those pushing a conservative agenda.

    FIRE is funded by far-right donors and is also ran by a bunch of right-wingers. Now it looks like they recently re-branded and are trying to become a conservative version of the ACLU!

    A huge difference between them is that the ACLU is protecting civil rights like the freedom to assemble and freedom to protest, whereas FIRE is going to fight to protect people from cancel culture. That's what "sanctity of conscience" in their mission statement is referring to. Just browse through the cases they support on their website and you'll get the idea. Don't miss the one where they wrote a Supreme Court amicus brief urging to make libel laws unconstitutional! You know, those laws that say it's a crime to tell a lie that's harmful to someone? Gee, I can't imagine why a conservative group would want to get rid of libel laws...

    -- Posted by Raker on Thu, May 18, 2023, at 8:58 PM
  • Why am I not surprised to see who is upset that conservative voices want an equal chance to be heard.

    -- Posted by techphcy on Fri, May 19, 2023, at 1:55 PM
  • Nobody's stopping conservative republicans from publicly saying their opinions! Republican hate of foreigners, trans, gays and pretty much all poor people is the problem... and colleges, social media, etc have the right to decide if they want to provide a platform for them to spread their message. They want to spread hate and then want protection when people get angry and respond. That's all this is! Everyone is free to say what they want, and others are free to respond. If republicans want to say how much they love free market capitalism, supply-side economics and limited government, then that's a totally different issue that liberals and progressives don't have any problem listening to or debating (because those are easily proven terrible ideas) The problem is that it's becoming near impossible to find a single prominent conservative that hasn't said or done something considered deeply offensive. That's a republican problem, not a free speech problem.

    -- Posted by Raker on Fri, May 19, 2023, at 4:24 PM
  • Funny. I agree with the hate though not from republicans but extremists.

    that being said, the greatest hate i have witnessed is from the LSSSLC.

    No political perspective has a monopoly on hate. We only consider something hate when we disagree with it.

    -- Posted by beg on Fri, May 19, 2023, at 9:56 PM
  • DePauw University in the past was an asset to Greencastle. Now it seems to be a university that demolishes historic structures in our town and causes more conflicts and demoralizes the people of our community.

    Our citizens have witnessed vulgar behavior and harshness from the students in our restaurants and public areas. What happened to DePauw and the “Golden Rule” and Christian behaviors?

    -- Posted by Taxpayer5253 on Sat, May 20, 2023, at 8:44 AM
  • > Nobody's stopping conservative republicans from publicly saying their opinions!

    DePauw was. To say otherwise is either full on delusion or willful misinformation.

    Typical leftist rationalization. “It’s not happening! But if it’s happening it’s a good thing!”

    -- Posted by techphcy on Sat, May 20, 2023, at 10:27 AM
  • Let's say I wear a maga hat out in public. Or a black lives matter t-shirt. Or a pro-life shirt. There's a good chance I will get some looks and maybe some comments. Someone might even confront me. That's nothing new in society. But if I wore any of those to work or school it might cause some type of problem that the employer or school administration would have to deal with. Whether anyone likes it or not, everyone here has the right to free speech, and everyone has the right to respond. What FIRE says is that we have to respond either positively, or not respond at all. Is that free speech? That's why no one should treat them as legitimate. I would guess that DePauw is going along with them to appease the conservative "free speech" mob and get them off their backs.

    -- Posted by Raker on Sat, May 20, 2023, at 1:52 PM
  • *

    To invoke James Baldwin, "We can disagree and still love each other unless your disagreement is rooted in my oppression and denial of my humanity and right to exist."

    -- Posted by Bunny1E on Sat, May 20, 2023, at 4:31 PM
  • By the way, I realize that "sanctity of conscience" doesn't mean "cancel culture", referring to my previous comment. That's just what I was reminded of after looking up what "sanctity of conscience" meant and then reading on their website the issues that FIRE is defending. "Sanctity of conscience" is something that religious conservatives are using to justify their actions when they recieve blowback. Fox news would call it "cancel culture", not me! Forcing religious beliefs on others or denying them their rights because of a person's religious beliefs are things that the "sanctity of conscience" idea/doctrine is used to justify, and is at the heart of alot of the culture war happening today.

    -- Posted by Raker on Sun, May 21, 2023, at 2:15 PM
  • Bunny,

    You understand one of the tenants of the SSSLCL playbook.

    -- Posted by beg on Sun, May 21, 2023, at 11:26 PM
  • *

    Beg, I left my Lil Orphan Annie decoder ring back at the patchouli scented commune. Care to unpack your acronym for us plebes?

    -- Posted by Bunny1E on Mon, May 22, 2023, at 10:54 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: