New zoning laws to provide flexibility for development

Saturday, December 16, 2023
By utilizing maximum density rather than lot size in future development, county officials hope to maintain more greenspace and agricultural land under the new unified development ordinance set to go into effect on Jan. 1.
Courtesy Civic Blueprint

Though often held up as a tool to “preserve the rural character” of the community, the old Putnam County Zoning Ordinance has often had the opposite of its intended effect.

For example, with the idea of not having farming ground taken over by rows of houses, the county long employed minimum lot sizes of five acres in the Agricultural 1 district and three acres in the Agriculutural 2 district.

Unfortunately, what often ended up happening was homes were built on larger lots, with the remainder of the lot simply sitting empty, no longer in service as farm fields. This remained the case even after the lot sizes were reduced to two acres and one acre, respectively, in 2022.

A lot has changed since this model was adopted by the county in 1992, and county officials are hopeful that the new unified development ordinance, which will take the place of the old zoning and subdivision control ordinances beginning on Jan. 1, will provide a more flexible approach.

“It’s a balance between predictability and flexibility,” County Plan Director Lisa Zeiner told the Banner Graphic. “It gives land owners and developers more flexibility while still anticipating growth.”

Such flexibility should come through a focus not on lot sizes but on population density. For example, while there are requirements regarding lot size, width and frontage in the new A1 and A2 district, they are less restrictive, with the main requirement being density — no more than one dwelling unit per 20 acres in A1 and no more than one unit per five acres in A2.

Likewise, the residential districts — there are now five — also hinge on density: One unit per acre in R1, 2.5 per acre in R2, five in R3, 10 in R4 and 18 in R5.

Additionally, flag lots — lots in which a residence is back a long lane that only connects to the road via a narrow corridor — were essentially a dirty word in the old zoning laws. Now they are allowed in rural subdivisions as a mechanism for maintaining good farm ground and using less favorable parts of the property for homes.

“So prime farm ground is going to remain and then put a home where you can’t farm it,” Zeiner said.

With rural subdivisions now allowing for “flag lots,” a portion of a parcel of land can be developed for multiple residences while maintaining most of the land for agricultural uses.
Courtesy Civic Blueprint

In a presentation to the Putnam County Commissioners on Nov. 20, Bryan Stumpf of Civic Blueprint, which developed the UDO for the county, showed how a rural subdivision would allow for three residential lots back one long lane, while maintaining the vast majority of farm ground in the area.

Zeiner said the hope is that the flexibility of the new ordinance will help alleviate the acknowledged housing shortage in the county, noting that Hendricks County and Danville particularly have managed to deal with development.

“It’s gotta come this way,” Zeiner said. “If surrounding counties aren’t having a housing problem, then why are we?”

Still, the focus remains on the homes in ag districts having as little impact as possible on agriculture and forestry.

More broadly, the UDO keeps an eye on land use in general by addressing mineral extraction, solar farms and wind farms. Specifically, changing a property to one of these uses will be handled as a rezone rather than a special exception. This will take such decisions out of the hands of the board of zoning appeals and put them into the hands of the plan commission and, ultimately, the county commissioners.

It is likely this would have led to a different outcome with the solar farm that the BZA denied earlier this year in Russell Township. County officials expect Cold Spring Solar Farm and developers Arevon and Tenaska to re-apply after the first of the year.

Likewise, with the UDO working more closely with the comprehensive plan approved earlier this year, approval processes are streamlined and clarified with processes working together to provide clear, concise and consistent land use decisions.

Zeiner noted that the BZA has consistently been busy over the years, which she said was an indication that the ordinance was not doing its job, leading to the need for lots of appeals.

The UDO addresses expanded topics such as transportation, infrastructure and natural resources. Zeiner said these issues were in the old comprehensive plan but it “hasn’t communicated well with the zoning ordinance.”

With HWC Engineering and partner Civic Blueprint developing the new ordinances together, those days should be over.

While many other issues are addressed in the 288-page document, the idea of being flexible is an undercurrent throughout so there isn’t another 30-year wait for a major overhaul.

“I’m sure there will be things five, 10, 20 years from now that we didn’t think about adding to it,” Zeiner said.

She said that the old document from 1992, and even the 2008 comprehensive plan, “was put on a shelf and not looked at again.”

That’s not the idea this time around, as this document will be more easily upgradable.

“We’re constantly using it, and the plan is every year to look at it and see how these documents are working for the county,” Zeiner said. “Are we meeting goals in the comp plan? Is there something better or worse?”

The UDO is also simpler to use than the old ordinance, even containing a user guide at the beginning.

With the process now done, Zeiner noted the praise Civic Blueprint gave to the steering committee in Putnam County, saying that the company was working on four different documents of this kind, but this one came together more quickly due to the work of the steering committee.

“We had a really diverse steering committee,” Zeiner said, noting contributions from farmers, foresters, realtors, housing developers, economic development and each town, including Greencastle, even though it will not be under the jurisdiction of the ordinance.

The UDO will be in effect for unincorporated areas as well as Bainbridge, Cloverdale, Roachdale and Russellville. Fillmore will continue to not have zoning.

Though Greencastle will continue to have its own zoning laws, the UDO does put the two-mile fringe surrounding the city in the control of the county as well.

For anyone wanting a better look at the new UDO and the new zoning map, links to both are available at https://co.putnam.in.us/building-and-planning.

These materials are also available at the Putnam County Building and Planning Office on the fourth floor of the Putnam County Courthouse. For more information, call 765-301-9108.

Come Jan. 1 the UDO will represent a major change not only in Zeiner’s office, but around the county. While she’s confident it will be for the better, she will use the number of cases coming before the BZA as an indicator.

“If we don’t have a lot of things coming before the BZA, that means it’s working in terms of the way people want to use their land,” Zeiner said.

Comments
View 25 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • We have a housing shortage because we don't want to grow. We like a small town. It's safe.

    -- Posted by Youseriousclark? on Fri, Dec 15, 2023, at 5:38 PM
  • No houses, no workers. No workers, no business and industry. Nobody wants to turn Greencastle into Avon, but we need to grow a bit to attract and maintain economic opportunities for county residents.

    -- Posted by Koios on Fri, Dec 15, 2023, at 7:13 PM
  • Nah....we good.

    -- Posted by Youseriousclark? on Fri, Dec 15, 2023, at 9:00 PM
  • Don’t bury your head in the sand. If you do this town falls apart.

    -- Posted by Koios on Fri, Dec 15, 2023, at 11:50 PM
  • "It is likely this would have led to a different outcome with the solar farm that the BZA denied earlier this year in Russell Township. County officials expect Cold Spring Solar Farm and developers Arevon and Tenaska to re-apply after the first of the year."

    Who is projecting an opinion here? Jernagan or Zeiner?

    -- Posted by direstraits on Sat, Dec 16, 2023, at 7:33 AM
  • In recent years, the debate surrounding the effects of housing availability on community dynamics has gained prominence. This article focuses on the potential benefits of limited housing in small towns, arguing that it creates a sense of community that is more secure and closely connected.

    • Methodology:

    To examine the relationship between limited housing and community dynamics, a comprehensive review of relevant studies was conducted. Studies from sociology, urban planning, and community development were analyzed to understand the impact of housing availability on safety and social cohesion.

    • Limited Housing and Social Bonds:

    3.1 Social Cohesion:

    Research by Sampson, R. J., & Wilson, W. J. (1995) indicates that limited housing options encourage residents to form stronger social bonds. The scarcity of housing fosters a sense of belonging and shared responsibility, leading to a more cohesive community.

    3.2 Civic Engagement:

    Studies such as Putnam, R. D. (2000) suggest that limited housing availability in small towns promotes higher levels of civic engagement. Residents are more likely to participate in community activities, local governance, and neighborhood watch programs, contributing to an overall safer environment.

    • Limited Housing and Community Safety:

    4.1 Reduced Transience:

    The work of Chaskin, R. J., Joseph, M. L., & Webber, H. S. (2012) indicates that limited housing options discourage frequent relocation. A stable resident population reduces crime rates and enhances community safety through increased surveillance and familiarity among neighbors.

    4.2 Neighborhood Watch Programs:

    According to Skogan, W. G., & Maxfield, M. G. (1981), small towns with limited housing options are more likely to establish effective neighborhood watch programs. Residents in tight-knit communities are vigilant and proactive in safeguarding their neighborhoods, contributing to a safer living environment.

    • Conclusion:

    The synthesis of various studies supports the hypothesis that limited housing availability contributes to the development of safer and more tight-knit small town communities. The findings highlight the importance of considering housing policies in the broader context of community well-being, emphasizing the potential benefits of fostering social bonds and enhancing safety through housing limitations.

    By understanding the nuanced relationship between limited housing and community dynamics, policymakers, urban planners, and community leaders can make informed decisions to create environments that prioritize safety and social cohesion in small towns

    -- Posted by Youseriousclark? on Sat, Dec 16, 2023, at 7:35 AM
  • But...what would us uneducated, townie, rubes know...

    -- Posted by Youseriousclark? on Sat, Dec 16, 2023, at 7:48 AM
  • The studies you cite would be more valid if they weren't 20+, 30 & 40 years old.

    A lot has changed in our culture and residential housing in that time.

    -- Posted by letspulltogether on Sat, Dec 16, 2023, at 7:59 AM
  • With this new UDO in place I wonder who will be the protector of prime farmland? The county council and the commissioners have already voiced their opinion (through their actions) that revenue to the county is preferred to preserving farmland. The new ordinance seems to take the BZA out of the process. Time will tell if this is a wise decision.

    -- Posted by rawinger on Sat, Dec 16, 2023, at 8:02 AM
  • Let’s hope that policymakers, urban planners, and community leaders aren’t relying on AI chat bots for information when making decisions.

    -- Posted by Koios on Sat, Dec 16, 2023, at 9:14 AM
  • For those concerned about farm ground being converted to other land uses, I refer you to Chapter 4, pages 12 and 13 of the UDO; also pages 26 and 228. The UDO document can also be read at: envisionputnamcounty.com.

    To limit high density residential growth to areas where infrastructure exists or can be readily expanded, was an objective of the steering committee. For this UDO to be effective in limiting the density of residential development which converts farmland to other land uses, though, it requires having strong support of the adopted Putnam County Comprehensive Plan by the Plan Commission and the Commissioners. The Plan Commission hears all cases related to rezoning and makes recommendations for action to the Commissioners. Rezoning will be make or break adherence to the adopted comprehensive plan and will determine the future land uses in Putnam County.

    -- Posted by LJScott on Sat, Dec 16, 2023, at 10:12 AM
  • Ya, chatbot can't find one study to cite that demonstrates increasing housing leads to safer and more tight knit communities, neither can you. Cite one. Just one. From any time frame.

    -- Posted by Youseriousclark? on Sat, Dec 16, 2023, at 2:33 PM
  • I don’t need a chat not to tell me this city, and county, has a pretty bad housing shortage.

    -- Posted by Koios on Sat, Dec 16, 2023, at 5:53 PM
  • Feelings are always better than facts.

    -- Posted by Youseriousclark? on Sat, Dec 16, 2023, at 8:35 PM
  • Fact is we have a housing shortage. Sorry that hurts your feelings.

    -- Posted by Koios on Sat, Dec 16, 2023, at 10:40 PM
  • Fact is there are other towns around with housing and we don't have to expand housing and potentially negatively change Greencastle.

    I know that hurts too, ❄️.

    -- Posted by Youseriousclark? on Sun, Dec 17, 2023, at 5:00 AM
  • Or we could expand housing opportunities and definitely, not potentially, positively change Greencastle. And you’re calling me the snowflake…..

    -- Posted by Koios on Sun, Dec 17, 2023, at 12:44 PM
  • Definitely?

    -- Posted by Youseriousclark? on Sun, Dec 17, 2023, at 2:02 PM
  • Koios wants to positively change Greencastle? Let's start at the fundamentals with adding a Chicago's Pizza and more parking at MacDonald's during the rush hour. Just an idea.

    -- Posted by Prince of Stardust Hills on Sun, Dec 17, 2023, at 6:53 PM
  • This does allow for food, feed, fiber, and energy producers to potentially sell their land for maximum value!!! Excellent retirement opportunity.

    Another benefit- will allow those who are against food, feed, fiber, and energy producers to pay more for those items. Also, be less of a provider to other areas of the world who have needs.

    Looks like a win win!!!!

    -- Posted by beg on Sun, Dec 17, 2023, at 7:02 PM
  • Oh, the drama. It’s like people didn’t even read the article.

    -- Posted by Koios on Sun, Dec 17, 2023, at 8:04 PM
  • Reliance on constant growth to fund an ever-growing government is a failure. Already major cities like San Diego are looking at very bleak futures because the necessary 6-7% growth rates can never be sustained long term. Social Security lasted as long as it has because of high birth rates, but now it goes deeper and deeper into the hole every year.

    We don’t need more growth. We need more responsibility. We will get it, regardless of who does or doesn’t want it.

    -- Posted by techphcy on Sun, Dec 17, 2023, at 10:05 PM
  • I don’t believe anyone is talking about constant growth, we need some housing to keep and retain business and industry. The comparison to San Diego is apples to oranges.

    -- Posted by Koios on Sun, Dec 17, 2023, at 10:10 PM
  • who wins in the apples vs oranges battle?

    -- Posted by beg on Tue, Dec 19, 2023, at 9:42 AM
  • This UDO isn't about Greencastle, which already has zoning and a comprehensive plan, and has for decades. This will serve the unincorporated areas and towns of Putnam County. It's an update to the existing Putnam County comprehensive plan, which was needed. Greencastle's comprehensive plan is sorely in need of an update, as well, and hopefully the next/new administration will accomplish this task.

    -- Posted by gustave&zelma on Tue, Dec 19, 2023, at 10:29 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: