[Nameplate] Fair ~ 81°F  
High: 88°F ~ Low: 72°F
Friday, Aug. 22, 2014

New rule keeps city vehicles on the move

Thursday, April 17, 2008

In line with her plan to make the city of Greencastle more environmentally friendly and in an effort to be fiscally responsible, Mayor Sue Murray has given her support to a plan to cut down on fuel consumption by city vehicles.

She and the other two members of the Greencastle Board of Works approved and adopted a resolution Wednesday afternoon to prohibit unnecessary idling of city-owned vehicles, beginning immediately.

"We're spending a lot of money on fuel," Murray told board members Trudy Selvia and Thom Morris. "We can't afford to waste any fuel."

She followed up her comments after the meeting by saying that she doesn't think the city's employees are "blatantly" wasting fuel.

"We just need to be responsible," she said.

Selvia spoke in agreement.

"It's a no-brainer," she said. "It makes sense at all levels."

The resolution requires city employees to:

* minimize idling and conserve fuel at all times,

* ensure assigned vehicles are properly maintained,

* ensure tires are properly inflated,

* plan and map out trips to minimize the distance traveled,

* carpool whenever possible or practical,

* reduce vehicle warm-up time,

* eliminate unnecessary weight in the vehicle,

* ensure the vehicle emission controls, systems and components are not altered or disconnected unless approved by the mayor.

Employees are exempted from the idling policy if they are sitting in traffic, if their vehicle must remain on to prevent a safety or health emergency, if they are responding to an emergency (but not solely for the convenience of the driver), if the vehicle is being serviced and needs to remain on or in the event of extreme weather.

The mayor said she wanted it to be clear that the new rules do not apply to residents of the city, however, she hopes that private citizens will be encouraged to conserve voluntarily.

In the meantime, Murray says she is continuing to look for ways to help the city be more "green." The city has applied for a grant that would allow it to buy energy-efficient lightbulbs that could be handed out, free of charge, to residents of the city.

In other business, the board:

* Approved the contract to begin allowing Greencastle utilities customers to pay monthly bills with credit cards. Clerk-Treasurer Teresa Glen said she thought it would take about two weeks, possibly a little longer, to get the system going. She said they would let the public know when they could begin using credit cards for their water and sewer bills.

* Approved a second water connection for Maurice Butler.

* Approved the hiring of William Boyce to the utility department and Herbert Embree and Donald Black to the cemetery department.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on bannergraphic.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Want to save money from misuse of gas, Maybe you should look at the cops driving cop cars for personal reasons, I have seen them driving out of Putnam county, and I know for a fact it wasn't work related.

-- Posted by victory on Thu, Apr 17, 2008, at 9:52 AM

I can't believe all of the people of Putnam county that love blaming law enforcement for everything they possible can. Are you bored?

-- Posted by mindmyownbusiness on Thu, Apr 17, 2008, at 11:21 AM

So, mindmyownbusiness, are you implying that what victory says doesn't happen? What kind of taxpayer provided vehicle are you driving? No, the people of Putnam Co. aren't bored, we are absolutely sick to death of paying 35% of our income so government entities can waste it faster than we can make it!

-- Posted by aok on Thu, Apr 17, 2008, at 3:23 PM

Having that patrol car is considered part of the salary. I'll admit driving to Indy may be a bit much, but driving around within Putnam County (or one county over) isn't out of line. It's either that or increase their pay another $5,000 or more a year to make up for it. Which would you rather pay for?

-- Posted by purple_heat on Thu, Apr 17, 2008, at 4:09 PM

If the car is considered part of their salary, are they keeping track of personal mileage and in turn paying taxes on the value of that part of their "salary"? That's how most private businesses handle company vehicles. Perhaps if that was the case and they paid for their own "personal" fuel, a real cut down on fuel consumption could be realized. Drive 'em where you want. Just don't expect a tax free perk and all the free fuel you can use.

-- Posted by aok on Thu, Apr 17, 2008, at 4:40 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.