Town of Cloverdale wins lawsuit, uninhabitable house to be razed

Thursday, June 10, 2010
This structure at 203 S. Lafayette St., Cloverdale, was deemed unsafe and uninhabitable by building inspector Mark Cassida in January 2009. Following a year-and-a-half battle, the house will join four other vacant structures for demolition.

CLOVERDALE -- The Town of Cloverdale recently won a court case against a man who filed for an injunction on a demolition order to tear down a derelict structure he owns.

The house owned by Jeff Everman at 203 S. Lafayette St. was deemed unsafe and uninhabitable by building inspector Mark Cassida in January 2009. It was found to have severe structural issues including uneven floors, an exterior wall exposed through shingles and a gas water heater with a 10-year-old red tag.

The town had concerns of safety, especially the safety of children who may play in or around the unsound structure. In February 2009, Everman was given written notice by the town stating his structure should be demolished pursuant to the unsafe building code.

The following month, Everman appeared before the Board of Zoning Appeals and requested his property be saved from demolition, as he felt the structure was sound.

Everman explained to the BZA during the March 2009 meeting the red tag on the water heater had been corrected and the other issues listed on the inspection report were "minor issues." He added the premise had been secured with locked doors and windows, which are now broken and missing.

"I have $40,000 invested in the house," he had told the board. "I'm not letting $40,000 go down the toilet. If the foundation is damaged, no, it is not in my best interested to repair it."

The board agreed to give Everman a six-month extension to bring the house up to compliance with building code -- clean up the property and making it habitable along with other specific requirements. Six months later, Everman had not fulfilled the requests of the BZA.

In October, Everman filed a request for appeal of the demolition order in Putnam County Circuit Court. However, the appeal was not filed in a timely manner and Judge Matthew Hadley denied his injunction based on ample evidence presented by the town.

"The town was well within its rights," said the town's attorney Allan Yackey during the council meeting Tuesday night.

The structure will be razed following a 30-day appeal time.

Comments
View 4 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Hey Roachdale!!!! If they can do it why can't you!!!!

    -- Posted by magoo55 on Thu, Jun 10, 2010, at 9:01 AM
  • heck and while your at it...Fillmore too

    -- Posted by cattlequeen on Thu, Jun 10, 2010, at 10:01 AM
  • The town(s) must flip the bill for the demolition. Then there is a lein on the property until it is sold. In today's economy, how long before the property sells? I'll bet that the town attorney gets paid long before the town collects their lein.

    -- Posted by Xgamer on Thu, Jun 10, 2010, at 12:39 PM
  • Xgamer said "The town(s) must flip the bill for the demolition. Then there is a lein on the property until it is sold. In today's economy, how long before the property sells? I'll bet that the town attorney gets paid long before the town collects their lein."

    You're familiar with Putnam politics and I'm sure you're more familiar with the local properties that are in worse condition. The sale of this property was probably well under way before any of this happened.

    -- Posted by westforty on Thu, Jun 10, 2010, at 12:53 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: