Walmart suing fire departments who battled Plainfield blaze, including GFD

Thursday, September 22, 2022
Crews deal with a fire at the former Walmart Fulfillment Center in Plainfield in March.
Courtesy photo

More than 30 fire departments -- including the Greencastle Fire Department -- who battled the Walmart Fulfillment Center blaze in Plainfield earlier this year have received notice that they are being sued by the commercial giant.

Greencastle Fire Chief John Burgess, Mayor Bill Dory, City Attorney Laurie Hardwick and members of the City Council have received word from Lewis Wagner Attorneys, Indianapolis, of a notice of tort claim -- the precursor to a lawsuit -- for property loss and damages relative to the March 16 fire.

The amount of damages is still being investigated, the tort claim notes, however the amount is currently known to exceed the $5 million statutory limit of the Indiana Tort Claims Act.

Correspondence from Lesley A. Pfelging of Lewis and Wagner related that the claim is “being sent on behalf of Walmart Inc. and its subsidiaries. The purpose of this letter is to provide notice of intent to pursue a tort claim, if ultimately deemed appropriate, for property loss, loss of inventory, loss of business earnings, loss of use and enjoyment and related damages.”

The claim is based on the “circumstances which brought about the loss, extent of the loss, the time and place the loss occurred ... the amount of damages sought.”

The claim notes that on March 16, 2022 a fire occurred at 9590 Allpoints Parkway in Plainfield and the Greencastle Fire Department “directed and participated in fire suppression activities.”

“Upon information and belief such fire suppression activities and/or command staff functions may have caused, contributed to and/or exacerbated the extent of property loss and damages,” the claim continues.

“Those activities, which are the subject of ongoing investigation included but are not limited to deactivating or disabling the fire suppression system, risers and/or pumps during fire response activities, and/or opening the facility doors which allowed additional oxygen to enter the premises before the fire was extinguished. After these activities occurred, the fire at the premises grew and spread quickly.”

GFD Chief Burgess said his department sent the city’s new aerial truck, Tower 1, and three personnel to the Plainfield scene where they put in a four-hour shift from midnight to 4 a.m. on March 17.

“It was pretty uneventful,” Burgess said his department’s involvement. “They went there and used the aerial truck, and were assigned to put water on some of what were smoldering trailers at that point.”

Commenting on the validity of the pending lawsuit, Chief Burgess suggested it looks as though, “They cast a net to see what they could catch.”

In addition to GFD and the Plainfield Fire Territory, other agencies and departments listed in the claim are Wayne Township, Washington Township (Marion County), Brownsburg Fire Territory, Decatur Township, Consolidated Indianapolis and Marion County, Indianapolis Fire Department, Pittsboro Fire Department, Speedway Fire Department, Danville Fire Department, Pike Township Fire Department, Amo Fire Department, Coatesville Fire Department, Stilesville Fire Department, Lizton Union Township Fire Department, North Salem Fire Department, Indianapolis Airport Fire Department, Jamestown Fire Department, Perry Township Fire Department, Madison Township Fire Department (not Putnam), Monroe Township Fire Department, Mooresville Fire Department, Whitestown Fire Department, Carmel Fire Department, Westfield Fire Department, Bargersville Fire Department, Greenwood Fire Department, Zionsville Fire Department, Martinsville Fire Department, Lebanon Fire Department, Hendricks County Fire Buffs, White River Township Fire Department and the Indiana State Fire Marshal.

In all, 350 firefighters from more than 30 agencies battled the blaze from 11:45 a.m. March 16 until the early morning hours of March 18. Some 28 engines, 25 ladders, nine medics and 12 tankers were deployed in the operation.

Walmart has decided not to rebuild the 1.2 million-square-foot facility that employed 1,000 at the time of the fire.

Comments
View 10 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Maybe we should all stop shopping at Walmart. They are greedy gold diggers anyway.

    -- Posted by Queen53 on Thu, Sep 22, 2022, at 5:45 PM
  • The old classic "Shotgun Lawsuit" Name everybody then let them prove what they did or didn't do.

    -- Posted by Togafarm on Thu, Sep 22, 2022, at 7:27 PM
  • I believe Sam Walton would roll over in his grave if he saw what his company has turned in to today!!!!

    -- Posted by Lbond48@yahoo.com on Thu, Sep 22, 2022, at 9:40 PM
  • This is probably the insurance company suing to try to recover their massive losses from this building. Any time they have to pay, every insurance company has teams of investigators and lawyers that will try their darndest to find anyone else who is liable besides them. Walmart will get paid for everything per their insurance contract; the insurance company is the one who needs to try to mitigate their losses.

    -- Posted by techphcy on Thu, Sep 22, 2022, at 10:38 PM
  • would the contents of the warehouse have been destroyed if they were soaked by the sprinkler system? The second question is would the lawsuit have been filed if the fire dept. would have failed to respond at all ?

    -- Posted by Alfred E. on Fri, Sep 23, 2022, at 9:29 AM
  • Makes me wonder if GFD should bring a watering, instead of a pumper next time Walmart calls for service!

    -- Posted by bastinbob on Fri, Sep 23, 2022, at 12:56 PM
  • Next time Walmart needs help from the fire department then let the department send them a bill first before responding.

    -- Posted by donantonio on Fri, Sep 23, 2022, at 4:27 PM
  • It doesn't escape my attention that firefighting is one of the very few careers where those going out on a call have no guarantee at all of returning safely. Some 350 men put their lives on the line to help protect lives and property on March 16th, including men from Greencastle.

    Like those who have already commented, I find it easy to react in anger toward a corporation that apparently is lacking in gratefulness. My hope is that as a community we can direct our emotions to showing our solidarity of support for those who have our best interest at heart.

    -- Posted by kellnp on Fri, Sep 23, 2022, at 9:39 PM
  • Gives me even more reason to stay away from Walmart and support their business! They might sue me if I slip and fall in their store! This is a pathetic waste of time and resources!

    -- Posted by jake71 on Sat, Sep 24, 2022, at 12:29 AM
  • I am highly convinced that the first responders and fire fighting personnel would have gotten there in a more timely manor but they were all tied up in the self check out line at the store.

    -- Posted by Brass101 on Mon, Sep 26, 2022, at 8:52 AM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: