New tax would end EMS bills for Putnam County residents

Monday, January 23, 2023

Emergency medical service is a public good, just like police or fire service.

That’s the belief of Putnam County EMS Chief Kelly Russ.

“My biggest battle when I started going through grad school for public safety, my biggest goal was to make people realize that EMS should be a service like police and fire,” Russ said. “You should not receive a bill when you call the police. You should not receive a bill for your house burning down. You also shouldn’t receive a bill for EMS service.

“No one should ever have to think about how much an ambulance could cost them when they need it, or not calling one when they need because they think they can’t afford it,” she added. “Access to EMS should be exactly like access to any other public services, without additional worry in an already worrisome situation.”

That goal could be just around the corner based on a recent action from the Putnam County Council, which voted in principle last week to approve a new EMS local income tax (LIT).

Coupled with the new tax will be the new policy of not balance-billing Putnam County residents for services rendered by Putnam County EMS.

This means that county residents who utilize Putnam County EMS will have their insurance companies – including Medicare and Medicaid – billed by EMS, but no further bills sent to the patients themselves.

“If we submit an EMS tax rate, anyone who lives within Putnam County will never receive a bill if that day comes that you need an ambulance,” Russ told the council in December.

However, Russ said that what people are paying is an up-front “membership fee,” which is proposed at an income tax rate of 0.1 percent. For someone making $30,000 a year, for example, that would be a yearly fee of $30, and on up for higher-level earners.

“What we need to do if we implement this tax is let people know that by paying an extra $30 a year on up, you’ll never have an ambulance bill,” Russ said.

According to numbers Russ presented to the Council, the proposed LIT rate, plus insurance revenue, would bring in an estimated $2,460,740.87 annually, which falls about $253,716.13 short of the 2023 EMS budget of $2,714.457.

While this is still a shortfall, it is a far cry from the approximately $1 million estimate without the tax. The new tax should create far less of a stress on the county general budget.

Additionally, the actual rates charged by EMS – both to insurance companies and out-of-county residents – are set to increase significantly based on a separate action from the Putnam County Commissioners.

In reviewing rates, Russ said she found that Putnam County EMS was charging, on average, 92 percent less than other EMS agencies throughout the state. As such, she proposed rate increases of about 42 percent to bring in additional revenue.

“By raising the rates, we’re not raising the rates on Putnam County citizens, but on the insurance companies and people who we respond to emergently that live outside Putnam County,” Russ said.

Russ said the concept of not balance-billing local patients is a relatively new one that was pioneered in the Washington, D.C., area but is especially new to Indiana.

“It’s rare that EMS doesn’t balance-bill,” Russ said. “I think we’re one of the first – if not the first – in the state to do this.”

It’s part of a shifting landscape for providers in which government reimbursement rates have decreased in recent years, though a patchwork approach to EMS really goes further back. While police and fire protection have long been considered a public good to be provided by local governments, EMS did not emerge until the 1960s and 1970s, and even then under a variety of models — for-profit companies, nonprofit organizations and both municipal-backed and county-backed agencies.

Even in Putnam County, the nonprofit Operation Life served county residents until the end of 2019, when Putnam County EMS took over its operations. To this day, Roachdale-based nonprofit PMH serves the residents of northern Putnam County and further out on mutual aid calls.

For-profit STAR Ambulance also has a base in Greencastle.

Russ also noted that while the rate increases will help with insurance billing, the lack of charges to local residents won’t make a big difference, as patient pay was just 6.4 percent of total income for the agency in 2021.

“It is minute the amount of revenue we bring in every year of patients paying their bills directly,” Russ said. “It was so miniscule.”

Instead, EMS will have a more steady source of income, which Councilman Phil Gick in particular noted prior to approval as being a necessity. In the end, Councilman Jay Alcorn made the motion to institute, which was approved unanimously.

However, the action is not yet official, as the tax will be subject to public advertisement in the Banner Graphic as well as a public hearing.

After this, the council will have the chance to formally approve the matter.

Should the tax ultimately pass, Russ is hopeful about what it means for the future of her agency. On a basic level, it could help with wages as well as funding new equipment without financing.

Her bigger goals include adding a fourth truck in the Heritage Lake area – trucks are currently housed in Greencastle, Cloverdale and Bainbridge – as well as a community paramedicine program.

Such a program would be a proactive approach to health care that would, ideally, help with the over-utilization of emergency services.

Staffed by a team that would ideally include a paramedic, a social worker and a law enforcement officer, such a program could do home visits for high-risk patients, postnatal visits for new moms and babies and address mental health and substance abuse needs, as well as administer vaccines.

This last need was actually addressed similarly during the COVID-19 pandemic with in-home vaccines administered through the Homebound Hoosiers program.

Russ sees it as a back-to-basics approach to health care.

“Increase coverage and go back to old-school home visits,” Russ said.

For now, though, the first step is cleared, with Putnam County EMS awaiting formal approval from the County Council.

Comments
View 13 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Article 1 section 8, but at a local level. It’s a great idea. It’s probably going to make some go bonkers though.

    -- Posted by Koios on Mon, Jan 23, 2023, at 10:06 PM
  • I'm not opposed to implementing a local option income tax for EMS, however I'm quite amused by the statement "By raising rates, we are not raising rates on Putnam Co. citizens, but on the insurance companies and people who we respond to emergently who live outside Putnam Co."

    I wonder if Ms. Russ has any idea who pays the bill when insurance companies raise their rates due to increased costs?

    -- Posted by rawinger on Tue, Jan 24, 2023, at 7:06 AM
  • I'm curious about the statement that funding has decreased for EMS in recent years, I can't find anything online about it. Could Mr. Jernagen or someone please share the source of this or where I can find more info?

    -- Posted by Raker on Tue, Jan 24, 2023, at 7:20 AM
    Response by Jared Jernagan, Editor, Greencastle Banner-Graphic:
    That's certainly a fair question. I'll admit, I don't have the original sources for this, but it was referred to by the last director of Operation Life as a contributing factor in the decline of that organization. Relying on someone I considered to be an expert in the field, I've referred to it a number of times in the past.

    https://www.bannergraphic.com/story/2324507.html

    https://www.bannergraphic.com/story/2369780.html

    https://www.bannergraphic.com/story/2381969.html

    https://www.bannergraphic.com/story/2413822.html

    https://www.bannergraphic.com/story/2422556.html

    https://www.bannergraphic.com/story/2659601.html

    At this point, "recent" may be a stretch as it appears the time to which Mr. Claflin was referring was in 2010.

  • No Thanks! We do not create another new Tax!

    -- Posted by jmack46120 on Tue, Jan 24, 2023, at 12:04 PM
  • Let me get this straight: it’s based on income tax. The most responsible folks who have insurance will pay a higher tax and receive the smallest benefit because EMS will bill their provider. While those without insurance can call for EMS without impunity and rest assured that EMS won’t come after them personally? That sure creates a perverse incentive NOT to carry insurance and keep more of my paycheck in my pocket. And we wonder why insurance rates are so high for the most responsible among us.

    -- Posted by The Crusty Curmudgeon on Tue, Jan 24, 2023, at 4:21 PM
  • *

    It's not a bad idea. But it sounds like a solution looking for a problem.

    However, if they put it under the Fire Department's control and just increase their budget accordingly, then I would think it much easier to swallow any tax increase. You simply increase the tax revenue from an established system. You don't need a whole other emergency service, or tax scheme.

    I don't like any progressive tax. (Again, it wouldn't be an issue if it was part of the Fire Department.)

    -- Posted by dreadpirateroberts on Tue, Jan 24, 2023, at 5:34 PM
  • @Jared Jernagan I appreciate it sir, thank you

    -- Posted by Raker on Wed, Jan 25, 2023, at 11:36 AM
  • I still can't find anything that says medicare or medicaid rates paid to EMS have ever been cut. They probably haven't increased like they should to keep up with healthcare costs, but I don't think that's the same as saying they've decreased. Looks like there was a big federal medicare program cut in 2010, but I don't see anything online that says it resulted it EMS payment cuts.

    I also saw that in the 2022 legislative session, Indiana passed HB 1112 that raised medicaid reimbursement rates for EMS. The bill was co-sponsored by state rep. Mike Andrade, who said medicaid payments have remained the same since 1976. Those raises in medicaid payments will start in July of this year 2023.

    They also passed HB 1314 that requires private insurance companies to negotiate rates directly with EMS providers so they can be better compensated, as well as changing some legal definitions for ambulance services which I believe I recall reading somewhere that was also meant to allow them to bill for more services. That law went into effect last year.

    So all of that along with this new tax is going to pay for everything mentioned. Amazing what can be done when you have tons of money.

    -- Posted by Raker on Wed, Jan 25, 2023, at 1:39 PM
  • If the cost of a "membership fee" is based on my income, that's a club I don't want to join.

    -- Posted by Old Soul on Wed, Jan 25, 2023, at 2:08 PM
  • dreadpirateroberts

    Why would the new tax not be an issue under a fire department? How much of a budget increase would it take? What about staffing? Sounds like it would cost even more money!

    -- Posted by putnamcountyperson on Thu, Jan 26, 2023, at 2:21 PM
  • What about non-emergency services--i.e. transport from a hospital to home or nursing facility after discharge? Many people cannot ride in a traditional vehicle of one of their family members, or someone may not be available to bring them home at that time. So when this occurs, is this a free ride, too? After all, it isn't an emergency situation.

    I agree with Old Soul, a membership fee based upon your income level isn't fair. You're not receiving more or better services than someone making far less. How does this differ from imposing this fee, that all know is a tax, as another line item on your property taxes? Every time you turn around someone proposes another .1% tax on our income. Putnam County resident pay 2.1% currently, which will increase to 2.2%, and our state tax rate is 3.15%. Pretty soon out county income tax rate may just be more than the state tax rate! Remember that our county tax rate started out at 1% many years ago and now it is more than double that!

    -- Posted by gustave&zelma on Thu, Jan 26, 2023, at 8:25 PM
  • look at the bright side- tax increases have not kept up with COL!

    -- Posted by beg on Fri, Jan 27, 2023, at 8:23 AM
  • beg--what are thinking?? Almost everyone's income has increased with the cost of living, even most retirees' SSA benefits increase every year with a COLA. When income increases, the taxes increase! We don't need to have the tax rate increase with the cost of living! The Indiana tax rate used to be 3.4%, now it is 3.15% and the State is doing just fine, even refunding $325 last year to every taxpayer. That logic is what can get us all in trouble financially!!

    -- Posted by gustave&zelma on Sun, Jan 29, 2023, at 12:56 PM
Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration: